Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Tories appeal court ruling granting assisted suicide

  • Print

VANCOUVER -- The federal government will appeal a British Columbia Supreme Court ruling that struck down Canada's ban on assisted suicide, Justice Minister Rob Nicholson said Friday.

The landmark ruling last month said the ban is unconstitutional and gave Ottawa a year to rewrite it.

Judge Lynn Smith also granted an immediate exemption to the law, allowing Gloria Taylor, one of the women who brought the lawsuit, to die with a doctor's help.

In a statement, Nicholson said the government intends to seek a stay on all aspects of the ruling, including the exemption for Taylor, while it goes to the British Columbia Court of Appeal.

Taylor, a West Kelowna resident, has Lou Gehrig's disease or ALS, and said she wants a doctor's help in dying with dignity before her illness progresses to the point she can no longer care for herself.

"The government is of the view that the Criminal Code provisions that prohibit medical professionals, or anyone else, from counselling or providing assistance in a suicide, are constitutionally valid," Nicholson said.

"The government also objects to the lower court's decision to grant a 'constitutional exemption' resembling a regulatory framework for assisted suicide."

Taylor hailed the lower court's ruling because it gives her control over when and how she dies. She had hoped the government wouldn't appeal.

"I would really like to think that the government would see that they can't do this to me," Taylor said last month. "They can't do this to other Canadians."

In her complex, 395-page judgment, Smith said the ban on physician-assisted suicide violates two sections of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms covering the right to equality and the right to life, liberty and security of the person.

She said the law must allow for doctor-assisted suicide in cases where patients have a serious illness or disability and are experiencing intolerable suffering. Such patients must ask for the help, must be free of coercion and cannot be clinically depressed, the ruling noted.

Nicholson, though, said the law has to protect people.

"The laws surrounding euthanasia and assisted suicide exist to protect all Canadians, including those who are most vulnerable, such as people who are sick or elderly or people with disabilities."

Nicholson also said the government would have nothing more to say on the matter while the case is before the court.

B.C. Civil Liberties lawyer Sheila Tucker, one of two lawyers involved in the case, said she's disappointed but not surprised by Ottawa's appeal of the case.

"We found the original decision to be extremely persuasive," she said.

The exemption in Taylor's case will stand until the appeal court decides otherwise, but Tucker wouldn't speculate on what she will do.

"Gloria's decision is an extremely personal decision; she's not going to make it based, I wouldn't think, on legal issues," she said.

Reached at her home Friday, Taylor said she didn't wish to comment.

Last year, Taylor joined other plaintiffs -- including a woman who took her dying mother to Switzerland in 2010 so she could end her life -- in a lawsuit challenging Canada's ban on doctor-assisted suicide.

Dr. Will Johnston of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition of B.C. said he's pleased with the government's decision to appeal the ruling.

"The fact that some people are so dissatisfied that they choose to kill themselves is a tragedy but it's no reason to remove all of the protections in law for the rest of Canadians."

He said there's a risk of assisted-suicide laws being abused by people who stand to gain financially from the death of elderly relatives, for example, and measures to prevent such cases haven't worked in other jurisdictions.


-- The Canadian Press

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition July 14, 2012 A23

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes


  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.


Make text: Larger | Smaller


Chief justices breakdown cameras in courtroom project

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A pelican comes in for a landing Wednesday afternoon on the Red River at Lockport, Manitoba - Standup photo- June 27, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • STDUP ‚Äì Beautiful West End  begins it's summer of bloom with boulevard s, front yards  and even back lane gardens ,  coming alive with flowers , daisies and poppies  dress up a backyard lane on Camden St near Wolseley Ave  KEN GIGLIOTTI  / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS  /  June 26 2012

View More Gallery Photos


Do you agree with the province’s crackdown on flavoured tobacco products?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google