Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Tories dial back sections of contentious refugee bill

Jailed 'mass arrivals' to get review in 14 days

  • Print

OTTAWA -- The Conservative government proposed amendments to a controversial new refugee bill Wednesday, but critics say they still have major concerns with the legislation.

Immigration Minister Jason Kenney acknowledged he was prompted to introduce changes to Bill C-31 by months of outrage from refugee advocacy groups and opposition critics.

"I believe it's not right for the government to take the position that the original bill is the only option possible," he said. "I'm open to other reasonable ideas... and I believe the modifications are in agreement with our objectives."

The Protecting Canada's Immigration System Act makes several reforms to the refugee system. The Conservatives say it's designed to crack down on bogus refugee claims.

Among other things, the bill would see people who are designated as part of a "mass arrival" detained for a year before the decision to imprison them is reviewed.

That measure is designed to address the recent arrivals of boatloads of migrants and deter future ships.

Kenney said Wednesday that provision will be changed so a review will take place at the 14-day mark, then again 180 days later.

"The intention has never been to maintain refugees in detention," he said. "The intention is to have a greater ability to process smuggled migrants who arrive in large numbers."

The year-long detention had been a significant issue for advocacy groups as the Supreme Court had ruled in 2008 that unreviewed detentions violate a person's rights.

The fix Kenney introduced may not solve the problem, said Rob Shropshire, interim executive director of the Canadian Council for Refugees.

"Certainly, knowing that at least there will be a review before 14 days, that's a good thing," he said. "But then if they are still going to go back and only make it every six months, that remains a serious concern."

The legislation will also be changed to make clear the government won't revoke permanent residency status for refugees when the situation in their home countries improves.

The original bill, as written, could have seen refugees who visited their now-peaceful countries of origin lose their permanent-residency status in Canada.

Earlier Wednesday, the New Democrats said they wouldn't support the bill without reforms. NDP immigration critic Jinny Sims said the changes will be studied in committee.

"What we have heard overwhelmingly from witnesses in the past two weeks is that this bill is fundamentally flawed," she said in an email. "It will do nothing to prevent human smuggling, while punishing refugees."

Kenney wants to see the new bill passed by June to override a refugee reform bill Parliament passed in 2010, which would take effect by then.

That bill, passed during the Tories' minority government, had several clauses changed as a result of negotiations with the opposition and received all-party support.

But the new bill revokes some of those compromises.

Kenney said the government simply isn't operationally prepared to implement the earlier version of the bill.

Shropshire said there are still concerns with the new bill.

They include a section that allows the minister to designate some countries "safe" and means people from such countries won't be able to seek refugee status.

It's still not known which countries will be on that list, though Kenney insisted Wednesday it won't be arbitrary.

-- The Canadian Press

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition May 10, 2012 A10

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Winnipeg Cheapskate: Home buying

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A female Mallard duck leads a group of duckings on a morning swim through the reflections in the Assiniboine River at The Forks Monday.     (WAYNE GLOWACKI/WINNIPEG FREE PRESS) Winnipeg Free Press  June 18 2012
  • MIKE.DEAL@FREEPRESS.MB.CA 110621 - Tuesday, June 21, 2011 -  Doug Chorney, president Keystone Agricultural Producers flight over South Western Manitoba to check on the condition of farming fields. MIKE DEAL / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS
my2011poy

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Should the federal government be able to censor how Ottawa is portrayed in the CMHR?

View Results

Ads by Google