Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Tour guides told to sing Senate's praises

  • Print

OTTAWA -- Summer students hired as tourist guides for Parliament Hill have been trained to praise the Senate and disdain democracies with three or more political parties.

A training manual for the 2013 summer season features an eyebrow-raising section about the value of the Senate, now embroiled in expense scandals and ethical breaches.

"Senate investigations are usually of a higher standard than those by committees of the House of Commons," says a 39-page manual on Canada's political system.

"Senate investigations are usually non-partisan, in that they do not suffer from excessive media exposure, and that senators... have the time to dedicate themselves to exhaustive research and analysis, often over long periods of time without having to meet the demands of the electoral process."

"The lack of partisanship... is one of the positive results of the much-criticized appointment system."

Each spring, a high-calibre group of 25 bilingual university students are tested on the contents of the manual, which is designed to prepare them for questions from thousands of tourists. The students typically have contacts with more than half a million people each year from May to August.

A copy, stamped "Summer 2013," was obtained by The Canadian Press after a request under the Access to Information Act to the National Capital Commission, which directs the guide program.

The students are trained to defend "Canada's second -- not secondary -- chamber" by pointing out that the Senate is relatively inexpensive to run.

"The Canadian taxpayer may feel that the Senate's achievements do not merit its cost, yet a 1991-92 review of its cost... showed that the Senate costs $1.61 per capita, while the House of Commons cost $8.49 per capita.

"All Canadians must be made aware of its many achievements."

The spirited defence of Canada's unelected upper chamber comes despite the manual's repeated warnings not to engage in debate with tourists on controversial questions.

The document notes, for example, that many visitors to the capital will criticize the monarchy, including the Queen.

"Don't get defensive... remember that most people can't be convinced of its utility or practicality."

A separate training manual on Canadian history advises them to steer clear of the issue of Quebec separation and the Constitution. "We do not suggest that you initiate a conversation on this topic..."

The politics manual also contains a section that touts the benefits of a two-party system, unlike the multi-party hue of the current House of Commons.

"In a multi-party group system the voter is liable to be confused by a variety of competing issues and solutions," it advises trainees, noting that a two-party system has more "moderation."

"The two-party system has acted as a great unifying agency in countries such as Canada and the United States, which have not any very deep underlying unity to begin with.

"There is however a bad side to this achievement of moderation," it acknowledges. "Often, the successful party leader is the man or woman who can dangle the largest possible number of carrots in front of the noses of the largest possible number of donkeys."

"To hold a party together by bribing first one interest group and then another is not an inspiring form of statesmanship."

Last week, an official of the National Capital Commission said the branch of the agency responsible for training these student ambassadors "is aware that sections of the... manuals are out of date and that they include information that is not accurate."

-- The Canadian Press

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition June 17, 2013 A7

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Police speak out on Red River search

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A Great Horned Owl that was caught up in some soccer nets in Shamrock Park in Southdale on November 16th was rehabilitated and returned to the the city park behind Shamrock School and released this afternoon. Sequence of the release. December 4, 2012  BORIS MINKEVICH / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS
  • PHIL.HOSSACK@FREEPRESS.MB.CA Winnipeg Free Press 090528 STAND UP...(Weather) One to oversee the pecking order, a pack of pelican's fishes the eddies under the Red River control structure at Lockport Thursday morning......

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Do you think volunteers dragging the Red River is a good idea?

View Results

Ads by Google