Canada's prime ministerial residence at 24 Sussex Drive is in a disgraceful state of disrepair, but the current occupant, Stephen Harper, says it's good enough for him and his family.
The real question, however, is whether it's adequate for Canada.
According to a recent report by auditor general Sheila Fraser, the answer is an emphatic no. The historic home's windows are cracked and loose, the air conditioning is ready to collapse, the electrical system is outdated, the kitchen and laundry areas are no longer functional, there is no sprinkler system, would-be guests in wheelchairs are out of luck because universal access does not exist, and the walls are polluted with asbestos.
In other words, the house is on the fritz and needs an estimated $10 million in repairs.
Ms. Fraser's investigation also found that some of Canada's other official residences, including Rideau Hall and Harrington Lake, are lousy with defects, too. The total repair bill is over $25 million, but the cost will increase if action is delayed, particularly in the case of 24 Sussex, the auditor warned.
In order to complete the repairs to the prime minister's residence, which hasn't had major renovations in 50 years, Mr. Harper and his family would have to move out for at least 12 months, maybe longer if more problems are discovered. It's an option he has rejected, saying he will remain ensconced in the home until the end of his term, which could be months or years away, depending on how you read the political tea leaves.
Since it would be unseemly to kick the Harper clan out of the house against their will, Canadians will have to wait until he voluntarily surrenders his job or until he is evicted by power of the ballot box. Mr. Harper may feel he is saving Canadians money by rejecting the repair job now, but he is actually jacking up the bill by delaying the inevitable.
There can be no doubt that the renovations must be done, not for the comfort of the occupants, but for the pride of Canada. Ms. Fraser said it best in her report: "The official residences are more than just housing for Canada's top political leaders; they are part of Canada's heritage... and belong to all Canadians. They contribute to Canada's positive image abroad and are often a source of pride for Canadians who visit them."
It is unfortunate that the residents of these homes over the years have not been their chief advocates. Canadians may frown on politicians who spend tax dollars frivolously, but they also know the difference between abuse of the public trust and respect for public institutions.
PREVIOUS
