Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Opinions
Advertising/Promotional Content

Special Coverage

    1. Canine
      Idol
    2. image
    3. Voting now open for your favourite Canine Idol
    1. Voting
      Closed
    2. image
    3. Please enjoy the profiles of the nominees
    1. Blue Bomber Report
    2. image
    3. Explore breaking Bomber news and archived stories and video

More Special Coverage

Poll

Do you consider yourself a decided voter leading into a pending federal election call? [Read about it here]

Yes

No

View Results

Alerts

    1. Editor’s Bulletin
    2. With Margo Goodhand
    1. Send us your video
    2. Upload breaking news clips
    1. Insiders Reader Panel
    2. Join Today!
Advertisement

Editorials

LETTER OF THE DAY

Unattractive option

Re: Day-care centres fit to burst, May 14.

I am a former Winnipegger currently living in the United Kingdom. My husband and I often discuss the possibility of moving back to Winnipeg. I would be interested in a career in child care, but the government regulations make it very unattractive for someone like me to go into this field. As far as I understand, I, a person with a bachelor of arts in sociology and a second degree in psychology, as well as a music degree from Germany, cannot enter this profession except as a child-care assistant, for which you need nothing more than a high school diploma and are paid a pittance. If I were to work in this capacity for two years, I could undergo an assessment that would raise my professional status to ECE II level. Why would anyone do that? A number of years ago, if you had a university degree, you would qualify as an ECE II, but this is no longer the case.

If there is such a shortage of spaces and qualified staff, why not make it easier for those of us who would love to work in the profession (and still be able pay the bills) to do so?

Katherine Krueger-Petersen

London, England

Advertisement

Top Jobs

» All Jobs
Advertisement