Books

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

She's red, they're blue; U.S. politics fetid brew

Reviewed by: Geoff Lambert

2/01/2010 1:00 AM | Comments: 2

Enlarge Image

Palin is an easy target for the leftist authors who contributed to Going Rouge.

Enlarge Image

Going Rouge

Sarah Palin: An American Nightmare

Edited by Richard Kim and Sally Reed

Thomas Allen, 320 pages, $20

Sarah Palin, who ran for U.S. vice-president on the McCain ticket in 2008, was not the sole cause of the Republican party's bitter loss.

Then-Senator Barack Obama's charisma, his chief opponent's pomposity and crankiness, and an incumbent with a poor record about to see his country plunged into a severe recession, all played a role in the worst GOP bashing for years.

Of course, she didn't help much. After the initial excitement, it became abundantly clear that she lacked the base to be an effective candidate.

Her interviews with CBS news anchor Katie Couric pretty much shattered any pretence she might have of policy expertise. And Tina Fey's mimicry of her on Saturday Night Live became a classic.

One might have thought that such a bracing kick in the pants would be enough to keep her out of politics for the rest of her life. But it looks, from the vantage point of late 2009, that she might try again.

However, in order to make life more difficult for her, a group of American leftists has produced this bizarre little book designed to totally discredit her.

With a title that puns off the title of Palin's new bestselling autobiography, it consists of a long list of chapters, and a few short pieces which are plays on the words palaeontology and palimpsest.

The best known authors in the collective are Gloria Steinem, Nancy Klein, Robert Reich and Sky Jones (yes, Sky Jones the artist).

The book is co-edited by a couple of people from The Nation magazine, which is the source of several of the articles.

The one thing all these great talents have conspicuously in common is a profound dislike of ex-governor Palin. They dislike her persona, her cultural values, her political values, the whole lot.

They are embarrassed that a candidate for the vice-presidency (and possibly higher) should have been a beauty queen in Idaho. Not cool; she should have chosen Maine.

She has a habit of winking at the camera during TV debates and has been caught showing a glimpse of stocking during photo sessions.

What America's best and brightest leftists most dislike about her, however, is her religious fundamentalism and her opposition to abortion. She is a gunshootin', moosehuntin', snowmobilin' redneck of the North.

She is a staunch supporter of capitalism, an advocate for the orderly but early development of Alaska's assets. She creaks with small-town values and is a suspected secessionist. And she is so anti-environmentalist that not a single polar bear will send her a Christmas card.

So what? Americans don't elect many intellectuals; they prefer the unsophisticated. And it unlikely a book such as this, so biased, so unfair will hurt Palin all that much.

One often hears of, and frequently witnesses the clash between red and blue in America, red representing the heartland, blue the urban northeast and liberal coasts.

This clash seems to be bursting out in earnest. And when all is said and done, there really isn't much to choose between them, is there?

Geoff Lambert is a political scientist at St. Paul's College at the University of Manitoba.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition January 2, 2010 H7

Rate this
This article has not yet been rated.

We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

2 Comments

Posted by: watchingout

January 3, 2010 at 11:10 AM

Geoff Lambert is clearly unfit to teach political science to undergraduates (or anyone else for that matter). No self-respecting academic uses the term "leftists" seriously, and certainly not as sloppily and broadly as he does here. And he's dead wrong about Americans' not electing intellectuals. Even schoolchildren could give numerous examples of brilliant minds who have occupied high elective office. From James Madison and Thomas Jefferson to Adlai Stevenson, Daniel Moynihan, and (yes) Bill Clinton, the US electorate has chosen thinkers to govern -- and probably in the same proportion as any other democracy.

Report abusive comment

Posted by: Tammy

January 2, 2010 at 8:36 AM

This reviewer is kidding, right? He's actually treating Palin as if she has some substance? A shred of grey matter? A viable candidate for anything? Shake your head, professor!