FP News Top Story

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

CIDA rapped for partisan letters from cabinet minister appearing on website

By: Bruce Cheadle, The Canadian Press

Posted: 01/15/2013 5:46 PM | Comments: 0 | Last Modified: 01/16/2013 10:33 AM

OTTAWA - Two highly partisan letters by a Conservative cabinet minister posted on a government of Canada website are to be removed after the Prime Minister's Office acknowledged they were inappropriate.

The letters by Julian Fantino, the minister responsible for the Canadian International Development Agency, or CIDA, were posted to the departmental website in December.

They appeared to violate a number of government communications policies designed to ensure that the taxpayer-funded civil service is not used for partisan purposes.

One Fantino letter was posted under a headline reading "Dear NDP: CIDA Does Not Need Your Economic Advice."

Another took the Liberals to task and contrasted their policies with those of the Conservatives.

A spokesman for Fantino told The Canadian Press in an email that the letters were "posted in error" and that CIDA "has been asked to remove them immediately."

After a link to the CIDA website appeared on Twitter late Tuesday afternoon, experts in public administration weighed in, calling the NDP letter a clear breach of the rules.

Jonathan Rose, a political science professor at Queen's University in Kingston who helps enforce an Ontario government policy on non-partisan advertising, wrote that the letter "seems to violate every single one of the Treasury Board principles" on government communications.

And NDP Leader Tom Mulcair told CBC he had never seen anything like it posted on a government website in his more than two decades in politics.

The Conservatives have been criticized before for playing fast and loose with the sometimes blurry lines designed to keep partisanship out of the bureaucracy.

The government insisted for months it was not instructing civil servants to call the Government of Canada the "Harper Government" in government releases, but a series of emails obtained under access laws by The Canadian Press revealed it to be a widespread and orchestrated practice — against the advice of civil servants who felt it breached the communications policy.

The Conservatives continue to use the Harper Government nomenclature in departmental communications.

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required

In which story did you find the error? *
Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.
What was the error? *
Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.
What should we have written?
Please indicate your source for the correct information.
Who else should we interview to improve this story?
Please include any contact information you may have.
Can we contact you in the future for advice on stories about this topic?
Yes

No
First Name: *
Last Name: *
E–mail Address: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Phone: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Colour:
Are you blue? If you can see this, leave it blank and get some CSS support.
Enter the words that you see: * This is to prevent our forms from being filled out automatically.
You have failed to correctly identify the words in the box above. Please try again.

More FP News Top Story

Undock

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.