The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION
Supreme Court will not hear challenge to government's reworking of wheat board
OTTAWA - The federal government scored another court victory Thursday in an ongoing battle over its changes to the Canadian Wheat Board.
The Supreme Court of Canada ruled it will not hear an appeal by eight former board directors, who accused the government of breaking its own law by making radical changes without first holding a plebiscite among grain producers.
New legislation introduced by Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservative government strips the marketing agency of its monopoly on western wheat and barley sales.
As is its usual practice, the high court did not release reasons for its decision.
Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz welcomed the ruling as "fantastic."
"It turns the page, lets farmers get on with what they do best, which is produce those great high-quality crops," Ritz told Regina radio station CKRM.
It is not the end of the legal battle. Supporters of the wheat board as it was prior to the change have filed a separate lawsuit in Federal Court. They said the Supreme Court rejection will not deter them.
"We have a class-action underway and that action is based on a variety of legal theories that are quite different from what was argued in the case ... that went to the Supreme Court of Canada," said Anders Bruun, a spokesman for the Friends of The Canadian Wheat Board.
The lawsuit seeks a court order to restore the board's monopoly and to give farmers $17 billion in damages.
The wheat board monopoly had forced western producers to sell through the board since the 1940s — unlike their counterparts in other parts of the country.
Supporters said the single-desk approach ensured better prices and prevented farmers from competing against each other for sales. But many producers opposed the monopoly and the Conservatives had promised for a long time to allow farmers to sell to whomever they chose.
In late 2011, the government introduced legislation to end the single-desk in time for the 2012 crop year. Wheat board supporters argued that Section 47 of the Canadian Wheat Board act prohibited the government from making the change without first holding a plebiscite among producers.
A Federal Court judge agreed, but the government appealed. The Federal Court of Appeal sided with Ottawa, saying the law did not require a plebiscite to open up grain marketing. The Appeal Court also said Parliament has the right to change its own laws.
— By Steve Lambert in Winnipeg
Fact Check
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
More FP News Top Story
- Back to Top
- Return to FP News Top Story
More FP News Top Story
(1 of 28 articles for this week)
Tiger Woods wins Players Championship as Garcia's hopes drown on island-green 17th
05/12/2013 8:41 PM 0Poll
Most Popular FP News Top Story
- Dates set for recreational food fishery in Newfoundland and Labrador
- Pakistani model's tattooed nude photo in Indian magazine causes uproar
- Senator's wife often got upset about health of much older husband: grandmother
- Car bomb at French Embassy in Libyan capital wounds 3 in latest sign of deepening lawlessness
- Israeli archaeologists discover ancient clay seal in Jerusalem, suggest link to Temple ritual
- Sex, celebrities and nostalgia play big roles in Super Bowl ads
- Unidentified victims of Bangladesh collapse buried as more graves are readied; toll now 420
- First lady: Jobs program has led to training or hiring of 290,000 veterans, military spouses
- Coroner: 5-year-old boy shoots 2-year-old sister in US with rifle he got as a gift
- Gunmen kill Pakistani prosecutor investigating Bhutto assassination, Mumbai attack
- Unidentified victims of Bangladesh collapse buried as more graves are readied; toll now 420
- Dates set for recreational food fishery in Newfoundland and Labrador
- Pakistani model's tattooed nude photo in Indian magazine causes uproar
- Nigeria, beset by violence from Islamic extremists, sets up committee on offering amnesty deal
- Police: Boston Marathon bomb suspect fired shots from boat, hospitalized in serious condition
- Israeli archaeologists discover ancient clay seal in Jerusalem, suggest link to Temple ritual
- Car bomb at French Embassy in Libyan capital wounds 3 in latest sign of deepening lawlessness
- Pressure grows to improve human rights for transgender people in Newfoundland
- Father of Rehtaeh Parsons pleads for new law against malicious harassment online
- Serena Williams beats Sharapova to win 50th career title in Madrid; Nadal wins men's event
- ESPN says it regrets that reporter described gay NBA player Collins as a sinner
- Pakistani model's tattooed nude photo in Indian magazine causes uproar
- Toronto aunt of Boston bombing suspects doesn't believe they're involved
- Unidentified victims of Bangladesh collapse buried as more graves are readied; toll now 420
- Census 2011 makes history: population in the West surpasses that in the East
- As Boston mourns, suspected brothers' radicalism comes into focus
- Dates set for recreational food fishery in Newfoundland and Labrador
- Car bomb at French Embassy in Libyan capital wounds 3 in latest sign of deepening lawlessness
- Elections Canada wants greater punishment powers in wake of robocalls debacle
- Israeli archaeologists discover ancient clay seal in Jerusalem, suggest link to Temple ritual
Ads by Google












You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.