The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION
U.S. government begins second review of Keystone XL oil pipeline
CALGARY - A new review into TransCanada Corp.'s politically-charged Keystone XL oil pipeline has begun.
In a notice posted to its website Friday, the U.S. State Department said the new environmental assessment will consider a different route through Nebraska to avoid the ecologically-sensitive Sandhills region.
Agencies, organizations and members of the public have until the end of July to comment on possible environmental issues, ways to lessen those impacts and the scope of the study.
The Obama administration rejected the full Alberta-to-Texas stretch of Keystone XL in January, saying Republican maneuverings to force a quick decision didn't allow enough time to rework the Nebraska route.
TransCanada (TSX:TRP) has since broken up the project into two parts, pressing ahead with the Oklahoma-to-Gulf-Coast leg first. That part does not need a federal sign-off because it crosses no international borders.
Meanwhile, the company filed a new application for the northern part between the Canada-U.S.. border and Steele City, Neb. last month. Canadian approval has been in-hand for years.
Backers of Keystone XL say the US$7.6-billion project will create jobs and reduce U.S. reliance on crude imports from unfriendly countries. Opponents have attacked the proposed pipeline for the "dirty" oilsands crude it would carry and for the harm a possible spill could do to farmland and water sources.
TransCanada said Friday's announcement signals the State Department remains on track for an early-2013 decision on the revamped Keystone XL proposal.
"The fact that the Department of State has reaffirmed its timeline for making a decision on a Presidential Permit for Keystone XL early next year is an important development and we look forward to the detailed schedule of the steps needed to meet that Q1 2013 timeframe," CEO Russ Girling said in a release.
"It is important to recognize that by the time a final decision on this critical piece of North American energy infrastructure is made, Keystone XL will be well into its fifth year of exhaustive and detailed studies, the most extensive review for a cross-border pipeline ever."
The final review, which will be a supplement to one completed last August, should only focus on the changes in Nebraska, added Girling.
"The rest of the Keystone XL route remains the same. The geology of the route remains the same. The environmental conditions remain the same. Nothing else has changed since the (final environmental impact statement) was approved."
Environmental group the Sierra Club said the last environmental review of the pipeline was "highly flawed and incomplete."
"The State Department must now undertake an unbiased scientific review of the entire (2,735-kilometre) U.S. route for the tar sands pipeline keeping in mind that the Ogallala Aquifer remains at risk, as well as more than a thousand water crossings and the drinking water for millions of Americans."
More FP News Top Story
- Back to Top
- Return to FP News Top Story
More FP News Top Story
(1 of 5 articles for this month)
Nadal overcomes doubts to win 8th French title; takes 22-match win streak into Wimbledon
06/10/2013 12:26 AM 0Poll
Most Popular FP News Top Story
- American-US Airways merger could jeopardize major hub airports, as mega airline consolidates
- US couple flees house infested with garter snakes, describe living in a 'horror movie'
- Dates set for recreational food fishery in Newfoundland and Labrador
- Critics blame feds for poor return of sockeye to Fraser River in 2009
- Ageless Teemu Selanne rests up for playoff drive with Anaheim Ducks
- In urban centres, more and more chickens coming home to roost - and lay eggs
- Ten years after 9-11, Canada-U.S. relationship has both trouble spots and bright spots
- Pakistani model's tattooed nude photo in Indian magazine causes uproar
- Free nicotine patches, gum to Ontario smokers being treated for other addictions
- Harper government has no plans to sell Via Rail: Transport spokesman
- Harper government has no plans to sell Via Rail: Transport spokesman
- Dates set for recreational food fishery in Newfoundland and Labrador
- Pakistani model's tattooed nude photo in Indian magazine causes uproar
- CGI establishes Ottawa centre focused on cyber security for businesses
- US couple flees house infested with garter snakes, describe living in a 'horror movie'
- American-US Airways merger could jeopardize major hub airports, as mega airline consolidates
- Seven killed in crash of plane chartered by Kinross Gold Corp. in Mauritania
- Pressure grows to improve human rights for transgender people in Newfoundland
- Afghan army gives donated rifles back to Canada in favour of U.S. weapons
- Polar bear chases man, charges Manitoba Conservation officers' truck
- Dates set for recreational food fishery in Newfoundland and Labrador
- Pakistani model's tattooed nude photo in Indian magazine causes uproar
- Harper government has no plans to sell Via Rail: Transport spokesman
- Unidentified victims of Bangladesh collapse buried as more graves are readied; toll now 420
- Israeli archaeologists discover ancient clay seal in Jerusalem, suggest link to Temple ritual
- Pressure grows to improve human rights for transgender people in Newfoundland
- Ten years after 9-11, Canada-U.S. relationship has both trouble spots and bright spots
- Police: Boston Marathon bomb suspect fired shots from boat, hospitalized in serious condition
- In unusual pattern, Oklahoma tornado tracked path of 1999 monster twister with record winds
- US couple flees house infested with garter snakes, describe living in a 'horror movie'
Ads by Google












You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
Have Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?
Login SubscribeHave Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?
SubscribeThe Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.