FP News Voices

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Increasing 'green-on-blue' attacks in Afghanistan worrying

By: The Economist

Posted: 09/5/2012 1:00 AM | Comments: 0

The war the West is waging in Afghanistan is awash with "metrics" meant to gauge progress. Now an ominous set of figures is drawing scrutiny.

This year, troops from the NATO-led coalition frequently have been attacked by their local allies in the Afghan security forces.

In 34 "green-on-blue" attacks this year, 45 soldiers have been killed and 69 wounded. In the most recent incident, on Aug. 29, an Afghan soldier shot dead three Australian soldiers at a base in the south-central province of Uruzgan.

One in seven of all NATO deaths this year has been at the hands of the very Afghan troops the coalition is trying to help and train. The habit appears to be growing: This year's death toll has already surpassed 2011's total of 35. U.S. President Barack Obama admits to deep concern in Washington over this trend and this week it was decided U.S. troops would no longer train Afghan police.

What is causing the attacks, and how they can be stopped, remains unclear. Very few of the attackers have been taken alive, since most were shot dead in self-defence or fled after their attacks. Without interrogation or even a handwritten note, investigators struggle to piece together a motivation.

The Taliban claim the attacks are the fruit of a campaign to infiltrate the Afghan army and police with assassins.

NATO commanders reject the notion of a centrally planned conspiracy. They estimate that only one in four of the attackers has links to the insurgents in one way or another, with only one in 10 attacks being the work of infiltrators. For the rest, coercion may perhaps play a role, with Afghan soldiers or police pressed into action by threats against them or their families.

Most of the attacks have nothing to do with the Taliban, the coalition maintains. Instead, they are rooted in the mixture of personal arguments and cultural misunderstandings that can flare fatally among heavily armed young men.

Afghan soldiers and policemen cite foreigners' swearing, arrogance, ignorance of Islam and disrespect toward civilians as sources of tension with their allies.

The strains of long postings and combat stress also play a part, Afghan commanders say.

Afghan soldiers are given little leave and can be posted to hot spots such as Helmand province in the south for years at a time. Here the effect of widely spread insurgent propaganda may have an impact.

The attacks are not limited to killing foreigners, however. Afghan soldiers or police have killed 53 of their comrades and wounded a further 22 in 35 separate attacks this year. The causes are again said to be a mixture: Taliban infiltration as well as grievances, sometimes intensified by ethnic, political or tribal animosities.

The simple point that Afghan army and police recruitment has grown hugely must also be a factor in the increased attacks.

Yet, whatever the causes, the effects on morale are powerful: NATO soldiers are noticeably more wary of their counterparts. Extra sentries, called guardian angels, watch over NATO troops when they work together. That adds to a feeling of mistrust.

The greatest impact may be political, however. According to Anthony Cordesman of the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies. The attacks weaken American support for the war, Cordesman argues.

"In a battle of political attrition," he says, "it becomes more and more tempting to rush for the exits."

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition September 5, 2012 A10

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required

In which story did you find the error? *
Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.
What was the error? *
Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.
What should we have written?
Please indicate your source for the correct information.
Who else should we interview to improve this story?
Please include any contact information you may have.
Can we contact you in the future for advice on stories about this topic?
Yes

No
First Name: *
Last Name: *
E–mail Address: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Phone: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Colour:
Are you blue? If you can see this, leave it blank and get some CSS support.
Enter the words that you see: * This is to prevent our forms from being filled out automatically.
You have failed to correctly identify the words in the box above. Please try again.

More FP News Voices

Undock

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.