Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Khadr returns
OMAR Khadr has returned home, raising the ire of those who say his real home is with the world's radical jihadists. Khadr has been a polarizing figure since he was apprehended in Afghanistan in 2002 and charged with murdering a U.S. soldier. He was the only captured combatant -- if that's what he was -- to be charged with murder for a death that occurred during combat.
His status at the time was controversial. The Americans called him an "unprivileged belligerent," meaning he had no right to take up arms, while others said he was a child soldier in need of protection and rehabilitation. For his part, Khadr at first denied killing the soldier, but pleaded guilty to the offence in 2010 under an agreement he would serve the first year of an eight-year sentence in Guantanamo Bay before being sent home to Canada to finish his sentence.
Related Items
The Harper government dragged its heels in honouring the plea bargain and it didn't disguise the fact it was holding its nose in allowing him back. His application could have been denied on the grounds he was a threat to public safety, or that he was likely to commit a terrorist offence, but it's unclear if those reasons would have survived a legal challenge. The main consideration for the Conservatives seems to have been that the Americans wanted him out.
Correctional officials are now assessing his character and developing a plan for his eventual release, which could happen next year under extensive parole conditions.
It's unknown if Khadr has truly risen above his radical upbringing, but it is certainly possible. One undeniable fact, however, is that he is a Canadian citizen and should be treated with all the rights, privileges and legal obligations of other Canadians.
The case exposed an anti-immigrant prejudice among some Canadians; they should remember there have always been radical elements among newcomers over the centuries, but the vast majority were and are the type who built Canada.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition October 2, 2012 A8
Fact Check
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
More FP News Voices
- Back to Top
- Return to FP News Voices
More FP News Voices
(1 of 50 articles for this year)
Tensions in Gulf monarchies palpable
04/30/2013 5:30 AM 0Poll
Most Popular FP News Voices
- Malaysia: Sodomy and democracy
- Shafia murder trial casts shadow over Canada's Islamic community
- Column: Olympic stakeholders should kiss ground Bolt walks on - instead of other way around
- Nova Scotia sours on NDP government
- Better for daughters, better for sons
- Consequences to banks of Libor scandal staggering
- Malaysia: Sodomy and democracy
- Healthbeat: Study finds that free birth control means fewer abortions and fewer teen births
- Mackerel wars harbinger of things to come
- Early childhood education overrated
- We uncover naked people making the news
- Canada needs to act against sex tourists
- Supreme Court to hear case of Saskatchewan woman who gave birth in store bathroom
- Abolition of human rights body a good idea
- Consequences to banks of Libor scandal staggering
- Malaysia: Sodomy and democracy
- Better for daughters, better for sons
- Column: Italy's "Super Mario" Balotelli rubs bigots' noses in their own ignorance at Euro 2012
- Column: In the small pond of France, Zlatan Ibrahimovic makes waves like Moby Dick
- Early childhood education overrated
- Medicine-wheel garden proves fertile idea
- Supreme Court to hear case of Saskatchewan woman who gave birth in store bathroom
- Abolition of human rights body a good idea
- Truce in the Mommy Wars? Amid an burst of online chatter, mothers debate where we stand
Ads by Google












You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.