Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Politics and religion
Like John F. Kennedy before him, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney suggested to the American people Thursday night his particular brand of faith is not a threat.
President Kennedy, a Catholic, famously said he would not take directions from the church on matters of public policy, and that the Constitution guaranteed the separation of church and state. For his part, Mr. Romney shrugged off his Mormon faith, saying the fact it made him different than most Americans was no big deal.
He also made a point of saying he would guarantee freedom of religion, even though there was no obvious reason for him to make such an assurance other than polls that show some American Christians don't like the Mormon religion.
There was a certain irony about a U.S. leader feeling compelled to trumpet freedom of religion in order to appeal to the better instincts of those who might vote against him because of his religion.
American presidential candidates may not talk about their particular brand of faith, but they all establish their credentials as men of God and faith. And as if to advertise those core beliefs, every president since the Second World War, including Barack Obama, has invited evangelist Billy Graham to the White House for an audience.
Prayer breakfasts and spiritual gatherings are routine.
In Canada, politicians do not feel obliged to declare their religious affiliation and for the most part Canadians don't seem to care if their leaders attend church or not.
It's known that Prime Minister Stephen Harper was raised in the United Church before joining an evangelical church, but it's never been a big issue, except among a few pundits who believe it's evidence of a secret right-wing agenda.
When Mr. Harper finished a speech with "God bless Canada," it caused a stir in the media because it sounded too American, but a subsequent poll found a majority of Canadians had no problem with it and they thought he should continue to use it.
Historically, Canadian Catholics, particularly the French-speaking variety, tended to support the Liberals, Protestants supported the Tories, while social gospel types and atheists backed the NDP, but those voting patterns don't seem to be as strong anymore.
Today, most Canadian don't even know the religious affiliations of their elected officials, or if they have one at all, but the question of religion and politics occasionally becomes an issue.
Stockwell Day was leader of the Canadian Alliance, a forerunner of the Conservative Party of Canada, when someone accused him of believing the world was only 6,000 years old and that people and dinosaurs co-existed. Mr. Day never commented on the issue, but a spokesman for the Alliance said the party believed all theories of creation should be taught alongside evolution.
More recently, B.C. Premier Christy Clark raised a few eyebrows when she appeared on a Christian TV show and said the Bible gives her courage and inspiration. In the United States, such a comment would have gone unnoticed because it is so common, but not in Canada, where high-profile politicians generally do not wear their religions on their sleeves.
In Canada, unlike the United States, there is a distaste for the extreme religious right, partly because it is associated with opposition to abortion and gay rights. It is seen as a negative force that divides people and encourages intolerance.
But there is also a religious left in Canada and the United States with strong views on current issues, yet no one accuses this group of causing divisions.
It's regrettable that American politicians feel a need to pander to various religious constituencies, but the fact they do shows church and state are not completely separate. The relationship between pulpit and politician in Canada is far healthier, which is as it should be in a country where everyone is entitled to freedom of religion and conscience.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition September 4, 2012 A10
More FP News Voices
- Back to Top
- Return to FP News Voices
More FP News Voices
(1 of 50 articles for this year)
Tensions in Gulf monarchies palpable
04/30/2013 5:30 AM 0Poll
Most Popular FP News Voices
- Shafia murder trial casts shadow over Canada's Islamic community
- Consequences to banks of Libor scandal staggering
- How much is enough retirement income?
- Other Opinion: Lithium-ion batteries a work in progress
- Ovie TV and other stuff
- Supreme Court to hear case of Saskatchewan woman who gave birth in store bathroom
- Let's hear it for the red, white and blue-collar
- Better for daughters, better for sons
- Column: Italy's "Super Mario" Balotelli rubs bigots' noses in their own ignorance at Euro 2012
- At least 21 treated for burns for walking on hot coals after Tony Robbins event in California
- Shafia murder trial casts shadow over Canada's Islamic community
- Consequences to banks of Libor scandal staggering
- 'Birth of the nation' was terrible
- Column: Italy's "Super Mario" Balotelli rubs bigots' noses in their own ignorance at Euro 2012
- Housing homeless tackled
- China has good reason to embrace carbon tax
- Financial disciplinarian Gail Vaz-Oxlade doesn't pull any punches in new half-hour of humiliation
- Ovie TV and other stuff
- Multi-tasking comedian real princess of prime time
- Malaysia: Sodomy and democracy
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
Have Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?
Login SubscribeHave Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?
SubscribeThe Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.