Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
SNC's new reality
The arrest of the former head of Canada's largest engineering firm,
SNC-Lavalin, on charges of fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud and using forged documents is startling. More startling is just who and what is apt to be caught in the net of misconduct ensnaring SNC.
Former CEO Pierre Duhaime, who abruptly resigned from the engineering giant in March, faces charges related to $22.5 million in alleged improper payments to agents -- some of whom may or may not exist -- to win construction contracts related to the $2.3-billion redevelopment of Montreal's McGill University Health Centre. Ex SNC vice-president Riadh Ben Aissa, Duhaime's colleague of 20 years, faces the same trio of charges.
SNC-Lavalin is working hard to distance itself from its two former executives, emphasizing any wrongdoing is the work of employees no longer with the company.
This isn't just a public-relations rearguard action. The corporate entity that's SNC-Lavalin has good legal reason to try to divorce itself from the acts of its former executives because it, too, will likely face criminal charges arising from their activities.
Amendments to Canada's Criminal Code over the last decade have made it easier to prosecute corporate misconduct. Until recently, finding a corporation criminally responsible for the acts of its officers involved invoking the hoary common-law concept of a corporation's "directing mind." To attach criminal liability to a corporation's acts, they had to be traceable to its directing mind. But defining a corporation's directing mind was fraught with technical difficulties for prosecutors.
In 2004, however, the Criminal Code was amended to apply a wider concept of corporate criminal liability. Broadly speaking, the old directing-mind concept was junked in favour of a framework that attributes the criminal acts of any senior officer to the corporation. These less restrictive rules make charges more likely and increase the odds of the Crown winning a conviction.
SNC-Lavalin's very public disavowals of its former executives' actions disclose it knows it's up against the new reality of prosecution of corporate misdeeds.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition December 3, 2012 A10
Fact Check
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
More FP News Voices
- Back to Top
- Return to FP News Voices
More FP News Voices
(40 of 50 articles for this year)
U.K. press report fish-wrap?
12/3/2012 1:00 AM 0In July 2011, a muckraking journalist at the Guardian revealed that employees of the much bigger News of the World ...
Poll
Most Popular FP News Voices
- Consequences to banks of Libor scandal staggering
- A shortage of sperm
- First Bloke's prostate humour backfires
- China has good reason to embrace carbon tax
- What’s with the maternal outpouring for Dzhokhar?
- Consequences to banks of Libor scandal staggering
- Better for daughters, better for sons
- Healthbeat: Study finds that free birth control means fewer abortions and fewer teen births
- We uncover naked people making the news
- Canada needs to act against sex tourists
- Supreme Court to hear case of Saskatchewan woman who gave birth in store bathroom
- 'Birth of the nation' was terrible
- Malaysia: Sodomy and democracy
- Shafia murder trial casts shadow over Canada's Islamic community
- If it's on a stick, I'll eat it
- Consequences to banks of Libor scandal staggering
- Better for daughters, better for sons
- Column: Italy's "Super Mario" Balotelli rubs bigots' noses in their own ignorance at Euro 2012
- Column: In the small pond of France, Zlatan Ibrahimovic makes waves like Moby Dick
- Early childhood education overrated
- Malaysia: Sodomy and democracy
- Medicine-wheel garden proves fertile idea
- Supreme Court to hear case of Saskatchewan woman who gave birth in store bathroom
- Abolition of human rights body a good idea
- Truce in the Mommy Wars? Amid an burst of online chatter, mothers debate where we stand
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.