Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Courts uphold ban on 'sexy' work attire

  • Print
THERE has been a ban on "sexy" dressing in some workplaces and "Courts around the country, mostly federal courts governing states such as Illinois and California, are permitting businesses to ban what employers call 'sexy' dressing in the workplace," reports Eric Matusewitch, deputy director of the New York City Equal Employment Practices Commission.

And what is "sexy?" Matusewitch, who has worked on equal employment opportunity issues for 20 years, says the courts put it this way: "It's considered attire that is particularly revealing and of extreme fit, such as spandex, and also use of excessive makeup."

In response to charges by female employees that such codes discriminate against women, Matusewitch points out that "courts are holding that employers have a right to set reasonable dress and appearance codes.

"They state there is no sex discrimination if the codes apply equally to men and women. So, if men are required to dress conservatively, employers can require women to avoid tight, 'flashy' and revealing outfits."

What's revealed to me by the courts' stance is what women wear still is considered "provocative" and what men wear still is considered a matter of "grooming."

"In general, courts are stating that the appearance of company employees may contribute greatly to its image and success with the public -- and that a reasonable dress or grooming code is a proper management prerogative," the director said.

Fortunately for Britney Spears, she's not job hunting.

-- Chicago Tribune

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition March 27, 2004 $sourceSection$sourcePage

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

It’s the End Of the Term And They Know It, Part Two

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • Young goslings jostle for position to take a drink from a puddle in Brookside Cemetery Thursday morning- Day 23– June 14, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • June 25, 2013 - 130625  -  A storm lit up Winnipeg Tuesday, June 25, 2013. John Woods / Winnipeg Free Press - lightning

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Are you still on the Bombers' and Jets' bandwagons?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google