Local

Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION

CFS worker feels 'isolated and avoided' after testifying at Sinclair inquiry

By: Carol Sanders

Posted: 12/11/2012 12:31 PM | Comments: 0

Debbie DeGale (second from left) walks out of the Sinclair hearing Monday evening after stating her reports were changed by her superiors. (PHIL HOSSACK / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS) Photo Store

The social worker who testified that documents in the Phoenix Sinclair file had been altered is now facing repercussions at her work, the inquiry into the death of the child in care heard this morning.

When asked what it has been like for her at work at Winnipeg Child and Family Service lately, Debbie DeGale started to cry.

"I’ve had a feeling of being isolated and avoided," said the woman who obtained a social work degree from the University of Manitoba in 1986 and has worked in the field for 25 years. She still works for CFS as a prior-check contact worker.

On Monday, the former crisis response unit worker with Child and Family Services told the inquiry that documents were altered and information was missing from the file on Phoenix Sinclair. When cross-examined today, she repeated what she’d said earlier: that documents she filled out in May 2004 -- the year before Phoenix was murdered by her mother Samantha Kematch -- had been changed.

DeGale said she prepared the documents after receiving troubling calls on the same day from a welfare worker concerned about Phoenix’s whereabouts and that she was at risk with either parent and a woman who claimed to be an aunt saying Phoenix was being mistreated. DeGale contacted Kematch who said she had Phoenix and when DeGale said that didn’t gibe with reports they had that Phoenix was placed by her father Steve Sinclair with friends of the family, Kematch swore at her and hung up, DeGale recalled.

The crisis response worker filled out a safety assessment and assigned the case to the intake unit for further investigation with a 24-hour response time. The inquiry learned the document was altered to indicate she assigned a less-urgent response time of 48 hours. DeGale said other notes she would’ve taken didn’t get included in the file, either.

She testified that she didn’t learn about the changes being made to her work until after the commission of inquiry was ordered by the province in 2011. Now in its sixth week of public hearings, the inquiry was set up to examine the circumstances leading up to the 2005 murder of Phoenix Sinclair and her family’s involvement with child welfare agencies.

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required

In which story did you find the error? *
Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.
What was the error? *
Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.
What should we have written?
Please indicate your source for the correct information.
Who else should we interview to improve this story?
Please include any contact information you may have.
Can we contact you in the future for advice on stories about this topic?
Yes

No
First Name: *
Last Name: *
E–mail Address: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Phone: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Colour:
Are you blue? If you can see this, leave it blank and get some CSS support.
Enter the words that you see: * This is to prevent our forms from being filled out automatically.
You have failed to correctly identify the words in the box above. Please try again.

More Local

Undock

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.