July 3, 2015


Special air quality statement in effect

Local

Canalta withdraws downtown water park proposal

Winnipeg will not spend $7 million to subsidize a downtown water park after an Alberta hotel chain withdrew its proposal.

This morning, Coun. Justin Swandel (St. Norbert) confirmed that hotel chain Canalta has decided not to move ahead on a plan to build a 50,000-square-foot water park, hotel and parkade on city-owned land at The Forks. 

The proposed water park site, with the Museum for Human Rights in the background.

JOHN WOODS / FREE PRESS ARCHIVES

The proposed water park site, with the Museum for Human Rights in the background.

Swandel said Canalta sent a letter to city administration late Friday stating that the hotelier has concluded that "city council is not interested in moving forward with a water park, hotel and parking structure at this time."

Canalta's letter said the company selected the downtown location believing it was the only viable spot for a water park that met the city's criteria.  Read the letter.

"Council passed a motion that requires significant additional cost over and above what we have already incurred without knowing if any design we propose might be approved," the letter said.

Initially, Canalta wanted to build a hotel and water park on a city-owned parking lot known as Parcel Four, which is adjacent to the Canadian Museum for Human Rights. Councillors were inundated with negative feedback from constituents, who said The Forks isn't the place for a water park and were worried about whether the design would fit in with the area.

The company is best known for its rural hotels in Alberta and Saskatchewan and has not built in a larger urban centre. The plan called for Canalta to purchase the land from the city for $6 million and receive a $7-million grant in exchange for $700,000 worth of admission credits every year for the next 25 years.

Council voted to delay the project to get more specifics on Canalta's site and design plans. Some councillors who supported Canalta's proposal said the move could kill the deal.

Swandel said it would have cost Canalta hundreds of thousands of dollars to come back to council with the requested design information.

Canalta's letter to council

Mr. Barry Thorgimson
Director, Planning, Property and Development
City of Winnipeg

Dear Mr. Thorgimson,

After careful consideration of Winnipeg City Council’s decision of April 25, 2012 and reading the negative coverage of our preliminary proposal (based only on speculation), we have concluded that City Council is not interesting in moving forward with a water park, hotel and parking structure at this time. This is in spite of the fact that details of our proposal were submitted in response to a request for Expressions of Interest by the City. We selected the location, believing strongly that it was the only viable location for the water park that met the criteria of the Expression of Interest. We knew that the City needed to agree to sell the land to us and that the city had to approve our plans before we could proceed with the development.

Council passed a motion that requires significant additional cost over and above what we have already incurred without knowing if any design we propose might be approved. We must have a reasonable expectation of success before incurring further costs, which we do not have. We are disappointed but respect Council’s right to make the decisions they make. Unfortunately, Council has put us in a position where we have no alternative but to redirect our development efforts elsewhere. We thank you for considering Canalta but we feel it is best to withdraw our proposal at this time.

Yours truly,

Cam Christianson, CEO


View Parcel 4 in a larger map
History

Updated on Monday, May 14, 2012 at 12:05 PM CDT: Updated

2:08 PM: Adds link to poll question

2:15 PM: Adds map.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Scroll down to load more

Top