Clear

Winnipeg, MB

-28°c Clear

Full Forecast

Extreme cold warning in effect

Local

Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION

Katz conflict-of-interest case dismissed

Posted: 04/5/2013 3:18 PM | Comments: 0

Last Modified: 04/5/2013 4:28 PM | Updates

Advertisement

  • Print

Sam Katz’s future as the mayor of Winnipeg is secure after a judge dismissed the case against him this afternoon, ruling there was no violation of conflict-of-interest laws.

Queen’s Bench Justice Brenda Keyser had been asked to rule whether Katz violated Manitoba's municipal conflict-of-interest act when his office hosted a party for city councillors and department heads at Hu's Asian Bistro on Ellice Avenue in 2010. The bill for the event, paid for with taxpayer funds, was $3,084.35. At the time, Katz owned the restaurant.

Keyser refused to dismiss the case on the basis of technical-breach arguments, opting instead to decide it on its merits. 

The judge said Katz exhibited "bad political behaviour" and will have to be judged by the public at the next civic election in 2014. Throwing him out of office -- triggering a costly and time-consuming election -- would be the wrong move, she said.

Keyser ordered Joe Chan, who originally filed the case, to pay $10,000 in legal costs.

Katz did not attend the court hearing, but held a press conference at city hall to respond to the court decision. He said from his point of view "it's now history and we move forward."

The mayor refused to respond to the judge's comment that he exhibited bad ethical and political behaviour.

"The end result is it's not a conflict of interest and that's the bottom line," Katz said.

Had Keyser decided Katz deliberately broke provincial rules, he would have lost his seat as mayor. If she had found he inadvertently skirted the law, he would have kept his job but could be ordered to repay the money.

'Not about corruption'

Lawyer Robert Tapper argued Tuesday Katz was guilty, at most, of using poor "political judgment." Tapper said his client should only be judged by the court of public opinion.

"This case is not about corruption. This case is not about democracy. This case is about a Christmas party," said Tapper. "It's trivial. It's a Christmas party, for crying out loud."

Not everyone agreed. A group of about 20 people gathered outside city hall late Tuesday afternoon to call on Katz to resign.

Restaurateur Joe Chan filed a declaration in the Court of Queen's Bench last year alleging Katz was in a conflict of interest. After making procedural errors, Chan, who manages the Cathay House Restaurant and has worked for Daniel McIntyre Coun. Harvey Smith, withdrew his motion and was forced to pay $750 in court costs. The complaint was then picked up by human rights lawyer David Matas, who filed another declaration and appeared in court Tuesday to make his arguments.

Matas alleged the mayor knew Hu's Asian Bistro was his restaurant, he knew the invitations for the party came from his office, he knew the city was paying for the party, and he was aware of the conflict-of-interest rules. In his court filings, Chan said the suggestion $3,000 is an insignificant amount of money is "out of touch" with the reality of ordinary people and combating conflict of interest is the first line of defence against corruption.

"The mayor can't plead ignorance, he can't plead a mistake. He knew everything," Matas argued Tuesday. In his motion, Matas argued tolerating conflicts of interest leads to corruption, and in order to be credible on its stance against human rights violations abroad, Canada must be "firm, unequivocal and uncompromising" in its stance against conflict of interest at home.

"It's hard to say a restaurant owner doesn't benefit from customers coming into his restaurant," Matas told court. "The issue of conflict of interest is very important, so important that a small sum can lead to loss of office."

default video player to use on WFP
History

Updated on Friday, April 5, 2013 at 3:32 PM CDT: Updated.

4:18 PM: Adds reaction from Sam Katz.

4:28 PM: Adds new photo.

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.