July 31, 2015


Local

More diligence needed in getting guardians' consent for piercings: Manitoba Health

Darcy Jeanson and Cheryl Radcliffe are upset that, without their permission, Phase II pierced their 16 year old daughter's belly button at their booth at The Ex.

JOHN WOODS / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS FILE

Darcy Jeanson and Cheryl Radcliffe are upset that, without their permission, Phase II pierced their 16 year old daughter's belly button at their booth at The Ex. Photo Store

Proper procedure was followed but better discretion is needed, Manitoba Health found after its investigation into an incident in June in which a 16-year-old girl had her belly button pierced without parental consent at the Red River Exhibition.

At the Phase II Tattoo and Body Modification mobile unit on June 17, the girl brought along an 18-year-old friend who signed the consent form as her legal guardian and presented identification that was photocopied and kept on file by the Phase II operator.

"In essence what happened was the person who said he was the legal guardian misrepresented himself in this case. We feel that the operator followed proper procedures and precautions in ensuring that a consent form was provided and signed," Peter Parys, Manitoba’s director of environment, health and emergency preparedness said in a telephone interview.

"We think he (operator) acted responsibly in terms of asking for the IDs and following the proper processes."

Winnipeg’s body modification bylaw states anyone under the age of 18 must be "accompanied by a parent or guardian and also has provided written consent."

That procedure was technically followed but, as it was a stretch for an operator to accept an 18-year-old friend as a 16-year-old’s legal guardian, Parys said operators of local body modification businesses are being cautioned to ensure due diligence is in place.

"What we’re planning to do in regards to that is our inspectors doing their routine inspections and visiting establishment, we’re going to remind operators to use good descretion," Parys said.

"I don’t think any operator really wants to put themselves in a position that happened here where somebody misrepresented himself. So just a reminder that you need to use good discretion, you do have the right to refuse and if you don’t feel this person is truly the legal guardian or is misrepresenting themselves in any way, then really think about (not) doing the procedure."

Phase II owner Patrick Culligan told the Free Press in an earlier story he was satisfied that the requirement that the minor had an adult who signed as a legal guardian was fulfilled.

"We did not break any rules," Culligan said. "I went over the scenarios with the health inspectors. The scenario that happened is within those parameters that they gave me."

Darcy Jeanson and Cheryl Radcliffe had complained to Manitoba Health after the incident as the couple was not present, had not given permission for their daughter to have the piercing and didn’t find out about the piercing for several days.

ashley.prest@freepress.mb.ca

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Scroll down to load more

Top