Local News
Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
An Osborne heritage building by any other name...
MIKE.DEAL@FREEPRESS.MB.CA Enlarge Image
The historic Dennistoun House at 166 Roslyn Rd. has been listed incorrectly in city records for 25 years.
A heritage home at 166 Roslyn Rd. may have a date with the wrecking ball, but at least it will be known by its proper name.
City council's executive policy committee will meet this morning to determine the fate of a 101-year-old Osborne Village home erroneously called Dennistown House by both city officials and a developer that wants build a condominium complex called Dennistown Flats.
The correct name of the home is actually Dennistoun House, as the structure was built in 1908 for Manitoba judge Robert Dennistoun, whose surname rhymes with Kenaston.
For the past 25 years, the name has been listed incorrectly in city documents, thanks to an error made by the consultant hired to conduct a heritage assessment of the property back in 1984, when it originally acquired its historic designation, city officials confirm.
Last week, after city council's property and development committee voted to strip the home of its heritage status as a prelude to demolition, relatives and descendents of Robert Dennistoun contacted the Free Press, the city and developer Sunstone Resort Communities to point out the error.
The city plans to amend its records and Sunstone will rename its Roslyn Road condo proposal Dennistoun Flats, officials confirmed this week. Ironically, the 25-year-old error provides ammunition to demolition proponents who argue Robert Dennistoun is not a well-known Winnipeg historical figure.
If EPC concurs with the previous decision to de-list Dennistoun House, the proposal to strip the home of its heritage status will come before city council as a whole on June 24.
Sunstone has sought the de-listing because it wants to build a 74-unit condominium complex comprised of a 12-storey tower and a row of townhouse units along Roslyn Road, north of the Osborne Village Safeway store.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition June 10, 2009 A2
- Rate this
-
-
We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.
You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.
Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.
Post Your Comment
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
-
Flu Fight
News about the world's battle against the H1N1 flu pandemic
-
Winnipeg Blue Bomber Report
All of the latest on the Big Blue
-
Buy the Bowl
If dogs can paint, you can fight world hunger
-
Follow the Way!
Join United Way on its journey toward lasting change and better lives.
-
Winnipeg road closures
Check if your commute is affected
-
Editor's Bulletin
Sign up for daily bulletins
-
Blogs to Watch
We pick our favourite local blogs for you to follow
-
Breaking News Widget
Create and embed a Winnipeg Free Press breaking news widget on your site or blog
- Back to Top
- Return to Local News
Advertisement
PREVIOUS
Most Popular
- $50-million lottery ticket bought in Manitoba
- No more jail time for tot's death
- Tire problem factor in plane's belly landing
- Tears and fears
- Your weekend weather
- It all comes down to Bishop
- Doer the diplomat
- New police station moves a step closer
- Pair busted for drugs at South Beach hotel
- Bombers draw inspiration from movie 300
- $50-million lottery ticket bought in Manitoba
- No more jail time for tot's death
- Tories 'represent renewal' says McFadyen
- New police station moves a step closer
- Unnecessary visits discouraged
- Big prize or bust for Blue and Kelly
- Tears and fears
- Martin sorry for Tory torch accusations
- Hike in water, sewer rates tabled to fund upgrade
- Bombers draw inspiration from movie 300
- Tears and fears
- His turn to confront mortality
- $50-million lottery ticket bought in Manitoba
- Whenever I hear women complaining about the rat race, I think about the career I didn't have
- Tire problem factor in plane's belly landing
- How I found my dad's grave: A SON'S STORY
- Voice of a nation
- Your weekend weather
- US man accused of killing ex-son-in-law in New Jersey to tell jurors he was too fat to kill
- Best. Video. Ever.
Ads by Google
3 Comments
Posted by:
June 10, 2009 at 7:16 PM
Bottom line is in Winnipeg, it is not necessary to demolish heritage structures to build condos, given the ready supply of empty lots and non-historical buildings that could be torn town. The greatest tragedy of all though are the trees. it's a well known fact that you can't reproduce trees like that in a city environment any more - you can plant more but they will not reach anywhere near the same size. The developer does not seem prepared to even do a little PR work by saving at least a few of the trees - and have you seen their design for the condos? ugly.
Posted by: Mr. Reader
June 10, 2009 at 11:29 AM
I'm not sure how old the photo for this article is... but from the outside the house appears to be in good shape (from the photo anyway), so why do they seek to have it destroyed? Why not try and save the house and find another use for it?
Posted by: RememberNorthPortage
June 10, 2009 at 7:55 AM
"Ironically, the 25-year-old error provides ammunition to demolition proponents who argue Robert Dennistoun is not a well-known Winnipeg historical figure."
Why is this ironic?