Local

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Best route for busway pondered

Open houses to ask public

By: Bartley Kives

Posted: 09/7/2012 1:00 AM | Comments: 0 | Last Modified: 09/7/2012 11:18 AM | Updates

A rapid-transit bus enters the Osborne Street Station on the Southwest Transitway. (MIKE DEAL / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS ARCHIVES) Photo Store

Two options for Phase 2

Back in April, Winnipeg Transit opened the $138-million first phase of the Southwest Transitway, a 3.6-kilometre busway running between Queen Elizabeth Way near The Forks and Jubilee Avenue at Pembina Highway. Phase 2 will run between Jubilee Avenue and the University of Manitoba. While there's no plan in place to cover the $275-million price tag, Winnipeg Transit is trying to decide where this new stretch of dedicated busway will go. Here are the two possible alignments:

1. Parallel to Pembina

Route: South along the west side of Pembina Highway, on the east side of CN Rail's Letellier line.

Pros: Shorter and more direct. Would service existing housing and businesses along Pembina Highway.

Cons: More intersections to cross, necessitating more bridges and potential street closings. No room for a bike-and-pedestrian corridor. Negotiations required with CN to relocate tracks. Lower running speeds. Less potential to generate new property taxes through transit-oriented development. Higher overall cost for construction and property acquisition.

2. L-shaped dogleg

Route: West through the undeveloped Parker neighbourhood and then south along the Manitoba Hydro corridor that divides the Fort Garry Industrial Park from the Beaumont and Maybank neighbourhoods.

Pros: More potential to generate new property taxes through transit-oriented development. Room for a bike-and-pedestrian path. Faster operating speeds. Lower property-acquisition costs.

Cons: Longer and less direct. Negotiations required with Manitoba Hydro to obtain a right-of-way. Uncertainty surrounding development of Parker neighbourhood. No development plan for new housing along busway.

-- Winnipeg Transit, files

Related Items

Polls
- Which route should the city choose for the second phase of Southwest Transitway?

Enlarge Image

View of the options being considered. To view a larger and more detailed PDF file with this image, click the link at right.

Four years after Mayor Sam Katz and former premier Gary Doer announced the start of the city's first bus corridor, Winnipeg Transit is trying to determine how to finish it.

Transportation planners are in the midst of deciding which of two possible routes would work best to complete the Southwest Transitway, whose initial 3.6-kilometre first phase opened in May.

See a detailed map (PDF, 1.2 MB)

The second leg of the busway will run between Jubilee Avenue near Pembina Highway to the University of Manitoba campus, likely running through the former Southwood Golf Course lands before it winds up near Investors Group Field, the future home of the Winnipeg Blue Bombers.

Where precisely it goes between Jubilee and the U of M has been the subject of debate since last summer, when a draft of the city's Transportation Master Plan revealed two possible alignments: straight down Pembina Highway or on an L-shaped dogleg through three Fort Garry residential neighbourhoods.

Earlier this week, Winnipeg Transit director Dave Wardrop told city councillors his department is ready to ask residents of southwest Winnipeg which route they would prefer. A pair of open houses are planned for the Holiday Inn Winnipeg South on Sept. 19 (3 p.m. to 8 p.m.) and Sept. 22 (9 a.m. to 2 p.m.).

Mayor Sam Katz and chief administrative office Phil Sheegl have already issued tentative endorsements of the less direct route, which would utilize the mostly undeveloped Parker neighbourhood, as well as a vacant Manitoba Hydro corridor that runs alongside the Beaumont and Maybank neighbourhoods. This option has the potential to spark more housing developments that could generate new property taxes for the city, a fact sheet sent to councillors this week says.

Although the dogleg route is less direct, it is also touted as being faster and cheaper, as less property acquisition and bridge construction would be required, according to the fact sheet. But the dogleg is also a risky option, as it would not service existing apartments along Pembina Highway.

"This is where I get all messed up," said St. Norbert Coun. Justin Swandel, who represents one of three wards that would be serviced by the line. He said he sees the merits of both alignments but insists it doesn't matter what he prefers -- only where Winnipeg Transit officials wind up as part of a $1-million process of planning the second phase.

In an impasse that's become emblematic of the relationship between Katz and Premier Greg Selinger, the city and province have not been able to devise a plan to pay for Phase 2's estimated $275-million price tag. Nonetheless, city council has committed to completing the corridor by 2016.

Fort Rouge Coun. Jenny Gerbasi said she once thought the obvious way to do it would be to head straight down Pembina. Now, she's concerned that would preclude the possibility of building a bike-and-pedestrian path, as there is no room alongside the existing CN Rail Letellier line.

There is more room along the dogleg route, but that poses problems of its own, said River Heights Coun. John Orlikow. He's concerned there's no development plan in place for the Parker neighbourhood, which could also be home to an extension of the Sterling Lyon Parkway, never mind all the new housing that could sprout up along the hydro corridor.

"How can you conceptualize this when you have no idea how the development will play out?" he asked, insisting Beaumont and Maybank residents have no idea how their neighbourhoods will be affected.

"These are questions these people are going to want to know. And they won't get answers at the open house," said Orlikow, who said he urged the city to come up with a larger plan for Fort Garry.

bartley.kives@freepress.mb.ca

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition September 7, 2012 B1

History

Updated on Friday, September 7, 2012 at 11:18 AM CDT: Adds PDF of map

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required

In which story did you find the error? *
Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.
What was the error? *
Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.
What should we have written?
Please indicate your source for the correct information.
Who else should we interview to improve this story?
Please include any contact information you may have.
Can we contact you in the future for advice on stories about this topic?
Yes

No
First Name: *
Last Name: *
E–mail Address: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Phone: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Colour:
Are you blue? If you can see this, leave it blank and get some CSS support.
Enter the words that you see: * This is to prevent our forms from being filled out automatically.
You have failed to correctly identify the words in the box above. Please try again.

More Local

Undock

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.