Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Call to end permitted spanking lauded
Fix Criminal Code: medical journal
OTTAWA -- A medical journal's call to do away with Canada's so-called spanking law is something Manitoba daycare advocates say they've been demanding for nearly a decade.
"We, along with many other provincial and national organizations concerned with the well-being of children, have long held the belief that hitting children is not an acceptable form of guiding children's behaviour," said Pat Wege, executive director of the Manitoba Child Care Association Inc.
In 2003, the Manitoba association endorsed a cross-Canada coalition's joint statement on physical punishment of children and youth, said Wege.
Now, a strongly worded editorial in the Canadian Medical Association Journal has called for the repeal of Section 43 of the Criminal Code, which gives parents and teachers a legal defence when they physically discipline children.
"It is time for Canada to remove this anachronistic excuse for poor parenting from the statute book," editor-in-chief John Fletcher wrote in a signed editorial Tuesday.
The editorial will likely re-ignite debate on a controversial topic that has inflamed opinion for decades.
The Supreme Court of Canada upheld the Criminal Code provision by a 6-3 margin in a landmark 2004 ruling.
The high court ruled the provision doesn't infringe a child's right to security of the person under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment.
Several private member's bills to ban corporal punishment have failed in the House of Commons and Senate, most recently in 2008.
Physical punishment is prohibited in all licensed child-care facilities in Manitoba, said Wege. In the medical journal editorial, Fletcher argues parents need to be educated on how to discipline their children.
He said the Criminal Code needs to be amended because it tells parents physical punishment is an acceptable way to discipline children.
"Although it is not necessary to make spanking a crime to encourage alternative approaches to parenting, Section 43 of the Criminal Code of Canada sends the wrong message, stating, '... a parent is justified in using force by way of correction... if the force does not exceed what is reasonable under the circumstances.' "
The editorial said police already have discretion to decide when an assault is trivial, but argued "any bias" should be aimed at vulnerable children.
"To have a specific code excusing parents is to suggest that assault by a parent is a normal and accepted part of bringing up children. It is not."
-- The Canadian Press, with files from Carol Sanders
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition September 5, 2012 A7
Fact Check
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
More Local
- Back to Top
- Return to Local
More Local
(1 of 50 articles for this week)
Fire damages St. Vital home
05/19/2013 11:13 AM 0A home in St. Vital sustained $40,000 in damage after a fire Sunday.
Five fire units responded to a basement fire ...
Poll
Most Popular Local
- Police identify slaying victims
- North End proud
- Fishing for fashion
- Man charged, victims identified in double homicide
- Take me off your guest list, Harper
- Fire damages St. Vital home
- Actor works to disable bullying
- The end of the credit card?
- Katz bogeys again
- Leaving a gang isn't easy — Sidney Letandre, now a paraplegic, knows it all too well
- Charleswood deaths being investigated as domestic incident
- Man charged, victims identified in double homicide
- Co-worker 'sick' today? Maybe it's the $17M flu
- '2 minutes after I read the winning numbers, I retired': Winnipeg lotto winner
- Sex charges for ex-club boss
- An uncommon phenomenon
- Aboriginal leader Elijah Harper dies
- 'Responsible Winnipeg' ads appear on sign run by mayor-owned Goldeyes' baseball park
- Woman killed in head-on crash in southwestern Manitoba
- Restaurant Dubrovnik demolished
- Hundreds pitch in to dig out houses damaged, destroyed by Ochre Beach ice floe
- A child-custody catastrophe
- Charleswood deaths being investigated as domestic incident
- Man charged, victims identified in double homicide
- Co-worker 'sick' today? Maybe it's the $17M flu
- '2 minutes after I read the winning numbers, I retired': Winnipeg lotto winner
- Parents, community relieved and elated as missing boy found safe
- No threat from bag found at Winnipeg Square
- Man missing since 2009 found safe
- Earls on Main going, but new one coming
- Fishing for fashion
- North End proud
- Aboriginal leader Elijah Harper dies
- Take me off your guest list, Harper
- Police identify slaying victims
- Actor works to disable bullying
- Katz bogeys again
- King of Veggies rules these parts
- Who says house calls are a thing of the past?
- Don't run again, Sam: survey
- An uncommon phenomenon
- Province introduces changes to rules governing landlords, renters
- Crushing blow for amateur sport
- Ochre Beach residents are 'thankful everybody got out'
- Aboriginal leader Elijah Harper dies
- Fishing for fashion
- Hundreds pitch in to dig out houses damaged, destroyed by Ochre Beach ice floe
- Woman killed in head-on crash in southwestern Manitoba
- Sex charges for ex-club boss
- Giving your money, and expertise, to charity
- Hundreds pitch in to dig out houses damaged, destroyed by Ochre Beach ice floe
- Mental-health patients get own ER
- A child-custody catastrophe
- Black market in moose thrives
- An uncommon phenomenon
- Steen invests $1M in family entertainment centre
- Earls on Main going, but new one coming
- Province introduces changes to rules governing landlords, renters
- Crushing blow for amateur sport
- Boost same-sex curricula: union
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.