Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Court blocks CN blockaders

Treaty rights stop at private land: judge

  • Print

FIRST, a Manitoba judge put aboriginal protesters on notice any more rail-line blockades would end in arrests.

Now a decision from the Court of Queen's Bench has dismissed the protesters' efforts to overturn an injunction designed to prevent further blockades.

The senior master of Court of Queen's Bench said in a five-page written decision treaty land rights don't apply to privately held "real" property; such claims are made against commonly held "Crown" land.

Furthermore, the way the protesters went about their argument was wrong, wrote F.A. (Rick) Lee in his June 28 decision.

The decision is the first public word since Court of Queen's Bench Justice Don Bryk warned in February any more blockades would land protesters behind bars.

At that hearing, former Roseau River chief Terry Nelson argued against the injunction on the grounds he was defending his people's treaty land rights. He filed claims against Canadian National Railway and the federal and provincial governments.

But Nelson can't do that, since he represents no one but himself, the latest decision said.

"It may be that an aboriginal community at some time may wish to communally advance a claim to address some of the alleged 'abuses' by government in dealing with the land in question. But this is clearly not the way... The defendant Nelson is in no position to pursue this issue on his own behalf," the master's decision concluded.

On Tuesday, Nelson released the court decision against him after he received an electronic copy of it.

He said he will take his argument to the Federal Court, which has the authority to rule on both treaties and transportation.

Nelson told the court last winter the CN line sits on Treaty 1 land, which had been "stolen" from his people. A century ago, the track sliced through a large Ojibwa settlement at that location, carving up the community that later formed the three First Nations of Long Plain, Sandy Bay and Swan Lake.

Nelson said the court decision against the protesters came as no surprise.

"The main thing was that we showed up and said 'Hey white man, how did you get our land? How is CN's title to the land valid?' " he said.

On Jan. 15, a group of protesters, waving the flag of the American Indian Movement, paced back and forth in the bitter cold at a CN rail crossing about 100 kilometres west of Winnipeg. The day-long protest succeeded in stalling transcontinental rail traffic on the main railway.

RCMP refused to arrest the protesters and chose to divert traffic from the area, deciding they would take away the protesters' "audience" rather than make arrests.

Participants said the blockade was intended to send a message to Prime Minister Stephen Harper, pushing him to honour treaty rights.

CN spokesman Jim Feeny said Tuesday from Montreal the company is seeking a permanent injunction and damages against the protesters.

alexandra.paul@freepress.mb.ca

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition July 10, 2013 A5

History

Updated on Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 6:42 AM CDT: replaces photo, adds video

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Jets This Week: Predicting the line-ups

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A Yellow-bellied Sapsucker hangs out on a birch tree in St. Vital. The Yellow-bellied Sapsucker is considered a keystone species. Other species take advantage of the holes that the birds make in trees. A group of sapsuckers are collectively known as a
  • May 22, 2012 - 120522  - Westminster United Church photographed Tuesday May 22, 2012 .  John Woods / Winnipeg Free Press

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Are you worried Ebola might make its way to Canada?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google