Local News
Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Exchange area to get parkade
Project to preserve heritage facade
The King Building’s brick facade will be taken apart and then reassembled around parking/office structure. (WAYNE.GLOWACKI@FREEPRESS.MB.CA)
A new construction project is about to begin at the edge of Old Market Square just as crews are putting the finishing touches on the first phase of the Exchange District green space's $3.3-million facelift.
The city has issued a demolition permit for the 112-year-old King Building at the southwest corner of King Street and Bannatyne Avenue as a prelude to the construction of a new parkade that will preserve the red-brick heritage structure's facade.
The locations of the bricks in the King Building's east- and north-facing walls have been recorded and will be used to reconstruct the facade as part of a 160-stall parkade that will include underground heated parking and about 5,000 square feet of commercial space at the ground level. The original parkade design called for 186 stalls and 8,000 square feet of commercial space, but property owner Bedford Investments revised the plan when it added underground parking to the project.
Construction of the parkade will be complete by the summer of 2010. The city and downtown development agency CentreVenture are contributing a combined $2 million to the $7.4-million project, plus $800,000 in potential tax credits.
The current phase of the renovation of Old Market Square, meanwhile, will be completed in time for the June 18 start of the Exchange District BIZ's summer concert series. The square has new landscaping that includes a gradual slope in front of its stage.
Future upgrades will include a new stage and landscaping on the north side of the square, ideally to complement new structures going up alongside the Union Bank Tower as part of Red River College's renovation of the heritage building.
- Bartley Kives
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition June 12, 2009 B3
- Rate this
-
-
We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.
You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.
Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.
Post Your Comment
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
-
Flu Fight
News about the world's battle against the H1N1 flu pandemic
-
Winnipeg Blue Bomber Report
All of the latest on the Big Blue
-
Buy the Bowl
If dogs can paint, you can fight world hunger
-
Follow the Way!
Join United Way on its journey toward lasting change and better lives.
-
Winnipeg road closures
Check if your commute is affected
-
Editor's Bulletin
Sign up for daily bulletins
-
Blogs to Watch
We pick our favourite local blogs for you to follow
-
Breaking News Widget
Create and embed a Winnipeg Free Press breaking news widget on your site or blog
- Back to Top
- Return to Local News
Advertisement
PREVIOUS
Most Popular
- $50-million lottery ticket bought in Manitoba
- No more jail time for tot's death
- Tire problem factor in plane's belly landing
- Doer the diplomat
- Tears and fears
- Your weekend weather
- It all comes down to Bishop
- New police station moves a step closer
- His turn to confront mortality
- Martin sorry for Tory torch accusations
- $50-million lottery ticket bought in Manitoba
- No more jail time for tot's death
- New police station moves a step closer
- Tories 'represent renewal' says McFadyen
- Big prize or bust for Blue and Kelly
- Tears and fears
- Martin sorry for Tory torch accusations
- Unnecessary visits discouraged
- Bombers draw inspiration from movie 300
- CFS officials paid themselves first, audit finds
- Tears and fears
- His turn to confront mortality
- $50-million lottery ticket bought in Manitoba
- Whenever I hear women complaining about the rat race, I think about the career I didn't have
- Tire problem factor in plane's belly landing
- How I found my dad's grave: A SON'S STORY
- Voice of a nation
- Province, feds to improve Trans-Canada west of Winnipeg
- US man accused of killing ex-son-in-law in New Jersey to tell jurors he was too fat to kill
- The killer never left
Ads by Google
7 Comments
Posted by: dyachison
June 12, 2009 at 12:53 PM
Why do we have to give anyone 2 million to build a parkade. Why can they not do it on thier own? Do we get the money back? I think we really need to think about where we are spending money right now. This is not a good use of public money.
Posted by: R Galston
June 12, 2009 at 12:50 PM
CT, empty pigeon-infested buildings are indeed eyesores (so, too, are parkades), so how can the City and Provincie mitigate the problem of empty pigeon-infested eyesores? Letting an owner willfully neglect a property for nearly 20 years before helping them pay to demolish the building, doesn't seem like it will do anything more than encourage other property owners follow Bedford Investment's demolition-by-neglect formula.
But then, I myself don't own a heritage warehouse in the Exchange District , so my criticism has less validity right? Just like my criticism of the Bomber's performance less season has less validity because I am not a pro football player, and my criticisms of President Barack Obama are moot because I have not run for Federal office in the U.S.
Posted by: ConcernedAboutWinnipeg
June 12, 2009 at 12:16 PM
@CT: You're missing the whole point of how Bedford Investments tried the old "demolition by neglect" trick. They bought this building several years ago when it wasn't in such bad condition, and then simply left it to rot. Years later they try to get approval to have it torn down because it's in such bad shape, conveniently ignoring the fact that it is their own deliberate neglect that caused it to end up in such bad shape to begin with. The City is then left with two choices - allow a wonderful building to disappear from a prominent Exchange District corner which would ruin the streetscape, or else chip in and help save the building.
The current plan actually doesn't seem that bad, but how it came about seems awfully shady to me.
Posted by: CT
June 12, 2009 at 10:53 AM
People need to realize that empty, pigeon infested buidings -- regardless of whether or not they have heritage status -- are an eyesore.
The parkade is going to keep the facade and add more ground level commercial space -- great for another boutique or restaurant.
If people are so adamant about preserving heritage buildings then garner the capital to purchase them and put them to USE! Otherwise stop complaining
Posted by: MYhonestOPINION
June 12, 2009 at 10:51 AM
"They paved paradise and put up a parking lot,
With a pink hotel, a boutique,
And a swinging hot spot.
Don't it always seem to go
That you don't know what you've got till it's gone?
They paved paradise and put up a parking lot.
They took all the trees and put them in a tree museum.
And they charged all the people
A dollar and a half just to see 'em.
Don't it always seem to go
That you don't know what you've got till it's gone?
They paved paradise and put up a parking lot. "
Joni Mitchell
Posted by: swolfe
June 12, 2009 at 10:32 AM
So, what's the lesson here?
If you buy a historic building on one of the most prominant corners in the Exchange, neglect it and let it rot long enough, the city will finally give in and let you tear it down. Not only that, they'll give you $2 million to build a parkade. Sounds like a pretty sweet deal.
Parking is needed, but why can't we build parkades on existing surface lots instead of gutting the history in our downtown?
Posted by:
June 12, 2009 at 10:09 AM
This whole project speaks volumes about the lack of a coherent and aggressive policy regarding the heritage architecture jewel that is the Exchange District.