Click here to visit the mobile version of winnipegfreepress.com

Winnipeg Free Press > Local > Free on bail after 23 years

Local

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Free on bail after 23 years

Ostrowski released as Ottawa reviews murder conviction

By: Mike McIntyre

19/12/2009 1:00 AM | Comments: 9

Frank Ostrowski, with daughter Amber, waves to supporters Friday afternoon as he leaves the Law Courts building after 23 years behind bars.

RUTH.BONNEVILLE@FREEPRESS.MB.CA Enlarge Image

Frank Ostrowski, with daughter Amber, waves to supporters Friday afternoon as he leaves the Law Courts building after 23 years behind bars.

A Manitoba judge has given an eight-year-old girl the greatest Christmas present of all while putting the province's beleaguered justice system under further scrutiny.

An emotional Frank Ostrowski walked out of the downtown Winnipeg Law Courts Friday afternoon, tasting freedom for the first time in 23 years and vowing never to return to prison. Queen's Bench Justice Colleen Suche agreed to release the 60-year-old man on bail while Ottawa studies whether he's been a victim of a wrongful murder conviction.

"I've wished every single Christmas for my dad," Ostrowski's daughter, Amber, said outside court as she held him closely. She was even more excited for her daughter, who she phoned at school minutes after learning the bail verdict.

"I told her I have a very big Christmas present for her. She said 'Grandpa?' I told her that yes, Grandpa was coming home," she said. The reunited family planned to spend Friday afternoon hanging holiday decorations before heading out for a buffet dinner at Ivory Resteraunt.

Overshadowed by the Ostrowskis' joy was the fact serious questions are being raised about yet another Manitoba murder conviction. Kyle Unger, James Driskell and Thomas Sophonow have already had their names cleared after serving lengthy stints behind bars.

"The justice system worked today," James Lockyer of the Association in Defence of the Wrongly Convicted said outside court Friday. "Slowly but surely, we're setting right our old wrongs. Manitobans should take faith for that."

Lockyer believes the federal review of Ostrowski's case could take up to two years. In the meantime, he has a list of other Manitoba murder convictions he plans to sit down to review with provincial justice officials in the near future, believing the book has not yet been closed on wrongful convictions. Lockyer wouldn't say how many cases are under suspicion, but did say the most recent is from 13 years ago.

Ostrowski, a former hairstylist turned drug dealer, has maintained his innocence since the day he was arrested in the 1986 killing of Robert Neiman over a drug debt. He was convicted in 1987 of first-degree murder and sentenced to life behind bars with no chance of parole for 25 years. The Crown argued at trial Ostrowski feared Nieman was "ratting" on him to police.

Two other men were found guilty of Nieman's killing. Robert Dunkley was convicted of pulling the trigger and continues to serve a life sentence. Jose Luis Correia was was granted "faint hope" release last year and later deported to his native Portugal.

Ostrowski vowed Friday never to return to prison.

"The evidence is too powerful. My lawyer has proven the justice system failed me," he said.

Lockyer has argued there is considerable evidence Ostrowski got a raw deal at his trial in that important information was not disclosed by the Crown and police. The main issue is a secret deal key witness Matthew Lovelace made with federal authorities to testify against Ostrowski in order to get a cocaine-trafficking charge against him withdrawn so he wouldn't go to jail.

Lockyer said the offer should have been disclosed to the jury so they had a full picture of Lovelace's credibility.

Suche said Friday there is no evidence Lovelace was aware of any deal in exchange for his testimony -- but that doesn't change the fact it shouldn't have been kept secret.

"Lovelace presented himself as an individual who simply told what he knew, had nothing to gain by testifying as far as he was aware, and was motivated only by an interest in seeing justice done," she said. Suche said concerns raised in Ostrowski's case are not "nearly so compelling" as those in the Driskell or Unger cases.

"It might be fair to say that thus far the information has raised as many questions as it has answered," said Suche. "However, the questions raised are very serious and go to the heart of the Crown's case, being that they relate in a fundamental way to the credibility of a crucial witness and to trial fairness."

The judge said Ostrowski had earned the right to release. "He is 60 years of age and in declining health. If he is innocent, the years taken from him can never be restored," said Suche. "If the minister denies his application for review, he will return to prison to serve the balance of his sentence. In all of the circumstances, I conclude that it is not in the public interest that Mr. Ostrowski remain in custody."

Don Slough, Manitoba's assistant deputy attorney general, said his department was "satisfied" with Suche's decision to release Ostrowski, despite the fact the Crown was opposed to bail.

"There has been a public airing of the facts and it's brought a lot of clarity," he said. Slough said it's too early to declare Ostrowski a victim of wrongful conviction. He said further scrutiny of cases from Lockyer is also welcomed.

"There may be more and we'll deal with them on a case-by-case basis," said Slough. "It speaks more to an era that's long past. Many things have changed -- disclosure issues, the way we approach cases. There have been many, many changes since then."

Ostrowski will live with his daughter and granddaughter under strict conditions while his legal status is in limbo, including a $50,000 surety and a nightly curfew of 10 p.m.

"I'm going to start putting my life back together," Ostrowski said before leaving court.

www.mikeoncrime.com

 

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition December 19, 2009 A3

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article is currently rated an average of 4 out of 5 (3 votes).

    • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

9 Commentscomment icon

Parvez

Disadvantaged group in manitoba, which has one of the worst human rights abuse record in the country can not expect a fair justice due to cover-up on wrongdoing of decision making authorities. Every citizen should have an easy access to obtain a fair justice regardless of his/her position or background.

This is so sad that peace-loving and believe in human rights country like Canada is preaching all over the world for human rights protection, but allowing the reverse at home. Preaching should start with practice which seems to be lacking and proven time after time. Innocent people with limited resources are constantly suffering. Because on occasions even the media play negative roll in not pursuing the true path due to being bias against the victim. Due to all these factors, there has been mixed up in the system, which needed to be overhauled. x

Slough said----"Many things have changed------disclosure issues, the way we approach cases."

That's right, now most of his prosecutors just make deals, joint recommendations, and stay charges. That way they never have a loss on their record. And it helps pad those statistics which claim that Crime is down.

And the criminals? They're out on the street because that joint recommendation just called for "house arrest".

time for slough to take a hint. and get lost.

TRUTH SEEKER has a good point. If the WFP wants us to pay for an e-Edition, it is going to have to give value for money.

Reporting that street criminals commit crime and politicians play politics isn't informative enough.

We need to reporting on misconduct by bureaucrats, real estate developers, road contractors, police, other professions, etc. -- the difficult uncomfortable to report on stories -- stories that will get the reporter, editor and publisher shunned in the "polite society" they are maybe accustomed to.

Really, it is the those committing misconduct who should be shunned, not the reporters doing their jobs -- doing their duty to the public -- reporting it.

We need fair trials for those who apparently concealed evidence and who claimed there was no evidence when there was.

Even if those trials result in at most a short suspended sentence, they are needed for symbolic reasons, to start restoring the rule of law and credibility to our legal system.

If British police can charge British police with perverting the course of justice, so can Canadian police.

The only way to restore honour to the profession of policing is to eject the dishonourable from it, and to formally note the dishonour of those retired or dead.

Same with crown attorneys.

From a left-of-center newspaper:
www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/dec/18/stephen-lawrence-case-evidence-withheld

From a right-of-center newspaper:
www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article6961927.ece

I will say congratulations and my admiration to those police and crown attorneys whose actions and honesty have resulted in this case coming forward for re-trial.

Our system may not be perfect, but at least we have more honourable police and government prosecutors than many US states. In many places in the US it would still be like Canada 10 years ago, with the evidence suppressed by government employees.

We are getting there. We just have to go to the next step, and return to the Magna Carta principles that everyone must obey the law, including the Queen and government employees.

He was a drug dealer, that is still against the law. How can people say that drug dealers and all criminals should go to jail for life and get real sentences and then one goes to jail but was a victim? I understand he "may" have been convicted of a different crime then the one he was doing and it's great he gets to see his granddaughter I hope he won't start dealing again. But he was still breaking the law.

So Mike, you call yourself a crime reporter. Where were you all these years? A man in prision for over 20 years for a crime he didn't do. Who many stories did you do about this case? How about all the other wrongfull convictions, what did you miss all their trials as well? So there's more people still in prison for murder's they didn't commit.Maybe you should start looking into the facts, and not just believe what the police and the Crown are telling you. In a democracy the press is very important, it keeps the government in check and is supposed to inform the citizens of wrong doing.
The free press is only concerned with selling paper's and making $$$.

avatar

I am glad he got bail! His daughter and granddaughter must be so happy to have him home!

The real criminals once again here are the crown prosecuting attorneys and the police that committed fraud and coercion to put an innocent man in jail. We need to go back and prosecute these agents of the court. No transparency, no accountability, no justice. Next time it may be you or I wrongfully and unlawfully convicted. The law applies to all even if you work for the government.

The comment period for this story has ended.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Special coverage

Our Communities

Poll

Should the province spend $3.1 million to keep Greyhound inter-city bus service in Manitoba?

View Results

View Related Story