Click here to visit the mobile version of winnipegfreepress.com

Winnipeg Free Press > Local > Happy anniversary... where's my cake?

Local

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Happy anniversary... where's my cake?

By: Mia Rabson

1/02/2010 1:00 AM | Comments: 8

OTTAWA -- It was a double anniversary in Ottawa over the last week for the federal Conservatives.

On Jan. 23, Prime Minister Stephen Harper celebrated his fourth birthday as Canada's prime minister. Two days later, his party marked the first anniversary of Canada's Economic Action Plan.

If there was cake, I didn't get the memo.

The Conservatives had more reason to celebrate Friday when the appointment of five new senators to the red chamber gave them more seats than any other party for the first time in more than a decade: 51 compared to 49 for the Liberals.

There are also two Progressive Conservatives, two independents and one senator who describes herself as unaffiliated rather than independent. (She has been both a Liberal and a Conservative in the past).

The plurality gives the Conservatives control of Senate committees but not a majority vote in the chamber itself, so Harper doesn't yet have the makings of an easy ride through the Senate for his justice agenda.

That easy ride may have hit another snag with one of Harper's own recently appointed senators, former Montreal Canadiens coach Jacques Demers. Demers told a Quebec television show he doesn't believe in the Conservative plan to increase jail time for young offenders.

He also said he would have accepted an offer to sit as a Liberal senator had he been approached by a Liberal prime minister first.

Demers didn't hint he has any plans to switch allegiances, but he did show a glimmer of independence, perhaps even defiance, with his statements.

All of this will make the Senate an interesting place to keep an eye on when Parliament resumes next month.

 

Just a big kerfuffle

On Jan. 25, at 6:06 p.m. Ottawa time, Manitoba regional minister Vic Toews' office responded via email to my inquiry about Manitoba's failed bid for an HIV vaccine pilot manufacturing facility. The email ended up in my junk email box because it did not contain a subject line and was caught by our automatic filters. Because I did not see the response, I wrote in error in a story in the paper Wednesday Toews' office had ignored a request for comment.

The next day, after Toews' spokeswoman pointed out she had not ignored me, I discovered the email in the junk queue. I immediately apologized and posted a correction to the story on our website.

However, in a widely distributed email issued Wednesday, an email that was not sent to me, Toews accused me of wilfully ignoring the response because it "dovetails nicely with the overall political objectives and thrust of the news report."

He went on to say: "Whether the reporter was satisfied with the response is one thing. It is quite another to suggest the request for information is ignored. In fact, the Public Health Agency of Canada also sent out a similar statement. But then this is the Winnipeg Free Press and accuracy is not a priority in its news reports or the editorials based on those reports."

Toews did not send this email to me, as he does not communicate with me. In November 2008, he told me he had nothing more to say to the Winnipeg Free Press and has not since personally responded to an interview request. In fact, my first request to his office for a comment on the subject of the HIV facility was denied and I was told to seek comment from the health minister instead.

The emailed statement I received after my interview request Jan. 25, as Toews acknowledged in his mass email, was similar to the statement provided by the Public Health Agency four days earlier. In fact, it was word for word the same, save for a "We" inserted in place of "The Government of Canada."

mia.rabson@freepress.mb.ca

In my junk mail

 

For the record, this is the statement I did not properly acknowledge:

 

"Hi, what I can tell you is that we remain committed to the fight against HIV and AIDS.

"Moving forward, the Government of Canada and the Gates Foundation continue to work together with the aim of accelerating the development of a safe, effective, affordable and accessible HIV vaccine.

"Given the importance of our objectives, we are examining all options and will take the time needed to ensure the direction we take and the activities we choose to support yield the best possible results.

"Thanks."

 

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition February 1, 2010 A7

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article is currently rated an average of 5 out of 5 (1 votes).

    • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

8 Commentscomment icon

In this household we have ceased to expect ANYTHING from the government.

They continue to DUCK the major issues affecting Canadians. NOTHING has been done to deal with;

1. Job Losses, which are continuing, with no expectation of improvement.

2. Company pension income losses among a large segment of former workers.

3. A prime minister who uses any pretext to "prorogue to recalibrate."

4. A cabinet whose sole purpose is to advertise 'achievements' without substance.

5. A prime minister who is more comfortable at foreign locations speaking gobbledygook, than being forthright with Canadians at home.

I think you get the point.

And one wonders why nothing gets done in Parliament?

To whom was his email "widely distributed"? Conservative supporters, or other media types (but not the Free Press)? Just curious...

Actions (or inactions) speak louder than words, Mr Toews. By the way, I'm sure staff in Mr Harper's office don't read much about science, but the Canadian feds have been criticised for an absence of meaningful policy on science, by the internationally respected journal Nature (see January 14 headline editorial). The same issue has an article about our inadequate support for Arctic research (despite all the Arctic photo ops by federal politicians). Short-sighted behaviour justified by the budget deficit is still short-sighted.

This is pretty sad. I certainly hope the WFP is planning to get to the bottom of this project cancellation. It sounds as though there is a pretty meaty story here. Anyone remember CF-18?

I agree with Minister Toews. There is a media conspiracy against the Conservatives and Canada's most open, accountable and transparent government in history. How can the Minister be expected to respond with dignity when a reporter/columnist makes such an obvious partisan error? Indeed, how can the Minister, the Prime Minister, or the minority Conservative government be expected to govern in such an environment? It's a good thing Parliament is closed for the season, so the government is not exposed to this media/Opposition conspiracy. Thank you, Minister Toews for your indignation. You should not have to put up with this. I urge you to consider retirement so that you will no longer have to tolerate such ineptitude.

So Toews won't talk to the Free Press eh? Sounds like Vic really knows how to hold a grudge. Remember the time he told labour picketers outside his house they would be off work a year for every day they picketed?

Give em hell Vic! (In this case Vic will tell his "version" of truth and it will seem like you smell something burning)

P.s. I notice he's gone back to the Prime Minister in Wait-in' Layton look

Spineless. This is supposed to be the person running the Department of Public Safety?? Why bother having anyone in a Conservastive cabinet when they can't even have an original thought? (i.e. Because the PMO won't allow it) Pathetic...

The comment period for this story has ended.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Special coverage

Our Communities

Poll

Should youth convicted of serious crimes have their names made public?

View Results

View Related Story