Winnipeg Free Press > Local > Here's why fields are aflame

Local

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Here's why fields are aflame

Without fire this fall, there may be no crop next year

By: Kevin Rollason

21/11/2009 1:00 AM | Comments: 34

Stubble and threshed-out straw blazes in a field north of Winnipeg

JOE.BRYKSA@FREEPRESS.MB.CA Enlarge Image

Stubble and threshed-out straw blazes in a field north of Winnipeg

RM of CARTIER -- When smoke from burning stubble gets in our eyes -- and lungs -- city folk want it stopped.

Whether at home, or driving through the country, people see roaring flames and smoke billowing up and wonder why farmers turn their fields into something resembling hell every fall. The smoke wafts across the city, forcing people with breathing problems to either stay indoors or, in the worst cases, go to the closest emergency room.

Brad Rasmussen gives us a closeup look at an unburned field. Sunlight won’t make it through the matted stubble, he explains, so the soil won’t dry.

Enlarge Image

Brad Rasmussen gives us a closeup look at an unburned field. Sunlight won’t make it through the matted stubble, he explains, so the soil won’t dry. (JOE.BRYKSA@FREEPRESS.MB.CA)

Wet­ness could delay, even cancel, next year’s seeding.

Enlarge Image

Wet­ness could delay, even cancel, next year’s seeding. (JOE.BRYKSA@FREEPRESS.MB.CA)

Related Items

  1. Polls

But a few kilometres out here in farm country, when you actually stand in a field, you can hear from farmers why they do it.

 

Or at least you try to. You know stubble burning is a hot-button issue when a fiery farmer, pitchfork in hand, comes running through the smoke and flames across a field within sight of Winnipeg to order a reporter off his land.

Turns out, at the same time the farmer was raking his wheat thatch into rows to burn, the provincial government was moving to turn back the calendar and potentially make it illegal to do what he was doing.

Normally, stubble-burning is not a problem this late in the year. Normally, we'd have a decent summer with harvesting earlier in the fall and any necessary stubble-burning completed weeks ago. Normally, the fields outside the city -- like the lawns within the city -- would be under a blanket of snow by now.

But this year wasn't normal. A later-than-usual harvest has led to a later-than-usual stubble-burning season -- a stubble-burning season which wouldn't have existed if the fields weren't still clear of snow.

It's because of this longer-than-usual fall-like weather, that the province decided late Thursday to extend the deadline to apply for a permit to burn stubble from Nov. 15 to Dec. 4. It doesn't prevent farmers from burning, but it puts the decision to allow burning back into the hands of the province.

Burning at night is banned all through the year.

Brad Rasmussen, who farms 5,000 acres in this municipality with his brother and son, said "I only burn when absolutely necessary."

But Rasmussen, who also sits as one of two Keystone Agricultural Producers representatives on a provincial stubble-burning committee, said there are both economic and agricultural reasons for burning in southern Manitoba.

Crouching down on one of Rasmussen's wheat fields, long after combines and other machines have taken the wheat off the fields and left 10 cm pieces of golden stubble standing straight up, he points to the ground where the rest of the stubble is matted flat.

"This soil won't dry because the sun won't get through this," Rasmussen said.

"This would be OK in Saskatchewan, where it is dry, but out here our soil is too wet. It's probably because of our clay soil.

"It will compost, but it will cost you money. It's long-term good for the soil, but short-term pain.

"You'd have the possibility of not seeding next year."

Nearby, Rasmussen points to a field where flax was harvested.

"Flax is linen -- you can't work that into the soil," he said.

"You can work wheat stubble in. The (straw board) plant in Elie was great for us. They'd take half or 60 per cent of our straw. It's too bad it didn't work."

Rasmussen said farmers weigh both finances and their soil when they burn.

"They're saving money when they burn," he said.

"It also kills some of the weed seeds. It helps germinate because the sun hits the soil.

"And when the soil is ready, you'll be able to seed right away in the spring," he said.

Rasmussen said there is an art to burning. Too much and it harms the land. Just right leaves bits of stubble still sticking up in many places.

"When a field goes completely black, you lose your wind protection," he said.

"You have to burn it, but you have to leave some stubble. Look over there," he said, pointing to a field that had patches of black but lots of stubble still sticking up.

"He's trying to save his soil."

Rasmussen said after burning, farmers then can turn over the soil with the remaining stubble with machinery. Once is good, twice is better.

"The later you seed, the smaller your yield. With a field you're turning over once, you'll be seeding later."

Rasmussen said once the stubble has been burned, it will cost farmers about $7 to $8 per acre each time they turn over their soil before winter. He's not sure how much it would cost if they turned over unburned fields.

On a 5,000-acre operation like Rasmussen's, that's a cost of around $35,000 to $40,000 annually. In a profession where crop prices are low and expenses are high, that's a lot.

"If things were perfect, we would never burn," he said.

Rasmussen said the permit the province has farmers fill out is detailed, including having them put in which way the wind has to blow before they can light a match in the field.

"It's not carte blanche just because they give you a permit," he said.

"It's a plan to burn your waste material without affecting anyone's lives."

The organization that represents farmers also asked them to think before starting a fire.

At the same time the province extended the period to get burning permits, Keystone Agricultural Producers put out a statement saying "farmers must use good judgment when burning."

KAP vice-president Rob Brunel said, "We know the wet weather over this past season did not allow some farmers time to incorporate crop residue back into the soil and that environmental conditions have made it necessary to burn.

"As farmers, we are sympathetic to the concerns of those in areas that may be affected by stubble burning and we don't want lingering smoke to result."

KAP also urged farmers to make sure their fires are supervised at all times.

But a farmer northwest of Elie must not have got that memo.

Flames up to 10 metres high were raging in a drainage ditch along a road with no one, except for a reporter and photographer, watching it burn.

"That's not good," was all Rasmussen would say about that fire.

But Rasmussen said farmers do have to burn drainage ditches, or vegetation will plug them.

kevin.rollason@freepress.mb.ca

 

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition November 21, 2009 A6

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article is currently rated an average of 5 out of 5 (1 votes).

    • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

34 Commentscomment icon

Hmmm. Soybeans@ 30 bushels per acre at $10 per bushel. 5000 acres should yield about 1.5 million dollars in cash reciepts

Here’s an interesting fact…
Many farmers burn their fields without causing the smoke to billow across highways or into residential areas. There is some common sense when it comes to burning fields – check which direction the wind is blowing. If you live south of the city, do not burn on a day with a south wind! Most farmers are extremely conscientious about this because they don’t want to be the cause of a traffic accident or be the one responsible for a permanent ban on burning. Unfortunately, there are some that don’t consider this, which makes all of agriculture look bad.

Farmers feed cities.
Let the farmers do what they do if you want food.

it is so funny to hear how the city folk know so much about farming. and if it is that profitable, why don't you all start farming?

"before expences." (sic)

List those expenses and the dollar amounts please.

And what kind of crop are you speaking of?

I would like to see a return of turning over the land instead of burning it. It is healthier for the soil and the environment. If food prices go up as a result. I as a consumer would be happier to pay the price if it meant the end of stubble burning and a return of rotating crops. Flax is the only exception as it does not compost. Making it a very expensive crop to carry.

Vegetablr produce is beyond the means of a lot of people and I am one of them. However because my husband has diabetes fresh produce is neccessary for us. After turning to organic I have found that I waste less and we eat more vegetables. This means we live without some fun things other people have no trouble paying for like cigarettes and booze.

Also we have to rely on food banks for staples and we must cook all of our meals, No take-out. We also spend a lot of our time volunteering rather than going to movies. It is much more satisfying and opens up your circle of friends you can share a meal with and play a game of cards.

Better farming practices means a lifestyle change for most of us if we want to afford organic and composted fields. I can do it for my family. I am sure that many of you don't live on a working poor's income and so could afford it without even thinking about it. So, why not go back to a healthier way to farm.

Farmers have been burning their fields for centuries. It's a reminder that fall is here. I used to love driving and watching the fields burn, it was so beautiful at night. Tractors driving, fields burning, fall in the air, a reminder of the simple life. If the city folk, didn't want it ''all'' then they shouldn't be buying houses and building housing developments close to the country where the farmers are. Then there wouldn't be any issues. Farmers have always been in the same areas, they haven't moved their land.

KidSpeed
Too much speed, not enough thought. What is a reasonable crop? In a year like this with rain etc which has produced moulds etc in the grains,. Stubble and thatch might help the texture of the soil, but they don't provide the nutrients and minerals to replace fertilizer to help the crops grow.......oh, you want him to spread lots of manure? Where does he get that from? 5000 acres would take a heck of a lot......from where? You mention expenses, but you don't say what or how much they are. Get your figures right before you pontificate.

To eejay: I don't think farmers were here first. What a silly comment. First Nations people were here long before farmers; hunters, trappers and traders were here before farmers too.

To Joy: I would much rather breathe than eat. Like the Lung Association slogan says: "When you can't breathe, nothing else matters."

I agree with Kid Speed. And I grew up in a rural area and believe that there is a much better way to produce our food. Oh, and Joy, I don't think that our animals should be eating grain. They (cattle, chickens, etc) should be allowed to run free and eat more natural things such as grass, etc.

Its poor land husbandry. Farmers are increasingly dependent on fertilizers and herbicides instead of incorporating the organic matter (stubble and thatch) into the soil, which Rasmussen admits would be better for the soil and environment in the long run.

A reasonable crop on Rasmussen's 5000 acres at todays prices will produce 1.5 million dollars before expences. Don't feel too sorry for him if he must use a thatch shreader on his combine, and till his land a few more times to do his part for the environment.

View all Comments

The comment period for this story has ended.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Special coverage

Our Communities

Poll

Should the federal government provide new money to the Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences, which researches climate?

View Results

View Related Story