Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

FYI: Japanese 'research' an excuse to kill

Whaling fleet must be banned

IF you thought we saved the whales in the 1980s, think again. Although supposedly rescued by a 1986 moratorium on commercial whaling, they’re still struck by ships, caught in dis­carded nets, poisoned by pollution and harassed by the booming noise of underwater oil and gas exploration.

Beyond that, however, thousands upon thousands of whales have been studied to death -- quite literally -- by a branch of the long-entrenched Japanese bureaucracy.

The new prime minister of Japan, however, has promised to change many practices of the last 50 years of rule by his political opposition.

Each year, Japan sends a fleet of ships, including a huge processing factory, to the waters around Antarctica, an area declared a whale sanctuary by the international community in 1994. These vessels hunt and kill almost a thousand whales annually, with the entire operation paid for by Japanese taxpayers through the benign-sounding Fisheries Agency of Japan.

The agency calls the practice "scientific" whaling, taking advantage of a trawler-size loophole in the 1946 International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling to claim they are killing whales for research needs. The resulting whale meat that's sold in Japan -- and termed a mere "by-product" -- pays a part of the salaries and other costs. But with low market demand, the entire operation is heavily subsidized.

In fact, most marine scientists, including members of the International Whaling Commission's own scientific committee, agree that the research results from Japan's program could be achieved through non-lethal means, or are irrelevant to the commission's goals. But the Fisheries Agency of Japan continues to press for whaling, arguing that if Japan accedes to world opinion on protecting whales, then conservationists will turn their attention to far more important commercial fisheries. But concern over the state of the world's fisheries stands on its own, with the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization rating 80 per cent of commercial fisheries already overexploited, depleted or fully exploited -- alarming figures completely independent of whaling.

It's true that a small group of bureaucrats and populist politicians in Japan have asserted that killing whales is a cultural and historical tradition. Yet it was only after the Second World War that Gen. Douglas MacArthur authorized the Japanese navy to take up whaling in the distant Southern Ocean. The rich tapestry of Japanese culture that dates back thousands of years should not be used to justify a relatively new, expensive and unnecessary activity that tarnishes Japan's reputation. Winds of change blowing since August in Japan, however, could finally open the door to a solution. The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which governed the country almost continuously since 1955, was voted out of power in large measure because of a faltering economy and a stagnant bureaucracy -- both of which apply to whaling policy.

For 22 years, LDP governments subsidized whaling, even though the stockpile of unsold frozen whale meat had risen to 4,000 metric tonnes by the end of 2008, according to the Japanese Ministry of Agriculture.

Meanwhile, the last LDP government not only continued the whaling fleet's generous subsidy, including "golden parachutes" to retiring whaling bureaucrats, but increased it further for this year.

Change at the top of Japan's new government has not yet trickled down to those who oversee whaling and advocate for subsidies. Without taking the IWC negotiations out of the hands of the vested interests that have long protected Japan's whaling industry, transformation is unlikely. In the United States, high-level engagement by the Obama administration is needed to bolster the new government's representation on this issue.

ksackpewtrusts.org

Karen Sack is the director of international ocean

conservation at the Pew Environment Group.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition November 21, 2009 H16

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

0 Commentscomment icon

The comment period for this story has ended.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Special coverage

Poll

Would you pay more to supersize your garbage bin?

View Results