Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Posted: 12/15/2013 1:00 AM | Comments: 0
Strands of lights are ubiquitous this time of year -- tangled in leafless trees, framing windows, sparkling their way to Santa's sled. They are a beaming reminder of the warm feelings of the holiday season and the environmental costs of this time of hyper-consumption. In 2003, a paper published by the U.S. Department of Energy estimated holiday lights accounted for 2.22 terawatt-hours of energy use per year in the United States, which roughly equals the energy consumed by 200,000 homes annually.
Fortunately, Christmas lights have gradually switched to LED in recent years. They are up to 90 per cent more efficient than old-fashioned incandescent bulbs. So should you trash your old holiday blinkers for their LED counterpart?
From an environmental perspective, it's rarely advisable to discard something that works and replace it with an energy-efficient version, since the energy required to produce your new bauble is often greater than the savings it offers once you use it. It wouldn't make sense, for example, to trash a perfectly good sedan to buy a new Toyota Prius: Producing a car takes a lot of energy, and hybrids are only about twice as energy-efficient as conventional engines.
Holiday lights, however, are an exception to the rule. A new strand of LEDs will last four or five decades, possibly the rest of your life, depending on how long you leave them on (and how long you live). They're also less likely to start a fire, which is important when you're wrapping them around a bundle of kindling like a Christmas tree. If you're still harbouring an old strand of incandescent lights, the Earth begs you to ditch it and go for the LEDs. (If it's one of those multicoloured, flashing strands, your neighbors would probably second the motion.)
Of course, there are more extreme options for electricity grinches. When I was a child, my favourite tree adornment was a string of popcorn. Making such a thread is a fun family activity, and you can sneak a few kernels for yourself in the process.
Is it greener than a strand of lights, though? To make this comparison, we'll have to make some assumptions.
It's hard to say how much embedded energy is in a strand of Christmas lights. However, since the lights will last 40 or 50 years, that embedded energy comes very close to zero on a yearly average. The only energy we have to attribute to the lights is the electricity, which, for a strand of larger LEDs, is 2.5 watts. If you run them four hours per day for 30 days, that means 0.3 kilowatt-hours over the course of a season. According to EPA conversion data, generating that much electricity would emit about 200 grams of greenhouse-gas equivalents. (A carbon dioxide equivalent is all the greenhouse gases emitted, expressed in terms of the global-warming potential of carbon dioxide.)
Now for the popcorn.
According to researchers at the University of Massachusetts, when you crunch the numbers, the greenhouse gas emissions from growing, harvesting and transporting the roughly 500 grams you would need to trim a tree would generate about 230 grams of carbon dioxide equivalents.
In other words, from an environmental perspective, there's very little difference between trimming your tree with a pound of popcorn and using a strand of LED lights. That may seem surprising, since natural, farm-raised popcorn just feels greener than manufactured lights.
But details make a difference. Old-fashioned incandescent lights would be far, far worse for the environment: They use 10 times as much electricity as LEDs and don't last nearly as long. You'll also need to store your LEDs properly and turn them off when no one will see them anyway. Of course, if you have a few extra lights, you can't eat the leftovers.
-- Washington Post-Bloomberg
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition December 15, 2013 A2
Having problems with the form?Contact Us Directly
8-year sentence sought for Winnipeg man who set up bathroom spy-cams
Lawyers ask judge to overturn murder verdict in Hornbrook trial
U of W approves indigenous course requirement
Parole officials impressed with progress made by Winnipeg killer
Peguis First Nation elects a new chief, Cindy Spence, who replaces Glenn Hudson
Kelvin High School gets extra month to raise $1 million for track and wellness centre
Quebec judge calls Toews to task over ignoring letter from former landlord
Report of suspicious man unfounded: police
Firms shortlisted for $590 million transitway and Pembina underpass project
Wanted: info on trains blocking traffic
Wildlife federation pushes for ban on spot-light hunting
Barn fire kills 1,500 hogs; arson not suspected
Man arrested after indecent act Tuesday
WAG's Inuit Art Centre receives $500-K donation
Optimism running low among Manitoba's small business owners: survey
City's rail lines the real problem
Dad gets prison for abusing kids
Toews' lobbying to be probed
Police hide in cone of silence
Cold today and tonight, but weekend to be warmer
City Hall Roundup
Full support for roadwork list
Police presence at Net pharmacy
Getting a charge out of research
Filmon grateful for new job, life itself
How's my home, James? What the measurement means to flood-prone Winnipeg
Friends wanted: Program matches locals with immigrant families
RCMP quiet on large police presence at Canadadrugs.com offices
Death of Stony inmate investigated
City council approves final ranking of infrastructure project priorities
Portage Diversion being activated to deal with potential ice jams on Assiniboine River
Table for 1201 event set for May 23
U-Pass approved by city hall
Man sentenced to 16 years for sexually abusing his five children
Teen fighting back against alleged bullying with lawsuit
MTS inadvertently filters internet customers' traffic