Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Rights panel can hear discrimination case

OTTAWA -- A human rights complaint over federal funding of child welfare for aboriginals can continue after the Federal Court of Appeal denied Ottawa's request to quash the case Monday.

"Justice is coming for children," tweeted Cindy Blackstock, head of the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society, which brought the original complaint six years ago.

The society argued aboriginal children living on reserves were being discriminated against by Ottawa's chronic underfunding of child-welfare programs on reserves. Numerous studies showed Ottawa spent as much as 22 per cent less on child welfare for on-reserve children than the provinces did for children living off reserve.

The chronic underfunding left on-reserve kids with less access to services and programs that could help their families and meant they were more likely to end up in care than off-reserve kids. Former auditor general Sheila Fraser found aboriginal children are eight times more likely to be in care than non-aboriginal children. About 80 per cent of the children in care in Manitoba are aboriginal and at least one-third live on reserves.

The Federal Court of Appeal Monday upheld the 2012 Federal Court ruling that a 2011 Canadian Human Rights Tribunal decision not to hear the case was wrong. It paves the way for tribunal hearings on the case to proceed.

The case was first filed in 2007 and the Canadian Human Rights Commission agreed it merited a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal hearing in 2008. But the federal government challenged that decision in court, arguing the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the case. Both the lower court and the Court of Appeal rejected this argument and the case proceeded to the tribunal.

But in 2011, then-tribunal chairwoman Shirish Chotalia dismissed the case without any hearings. The federal government's only option now is to await the tribunal findings or appeal this latest ruling to the Supreme Court of Canada.

A spokesman for Aboriginal Affairs Minister Bernard Valcourt said Tuesday the minister wouldn't comment.

mia.rabson@freepress.mb.ca

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition March 13, 2013 A4

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Bomber fans give their first impressions of new stadium

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A nesting goose sits on the roof of GoodLife Fitness at 143 Nature Way near Kenaston as the morning sun comes up Wednesday morning- See Bryksa’s Goose a Day Photo- Day 07- Web crop-May 09, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • Goose sits in high grass near Marion Friday afternoon for cover -See Bryksa 30 Day goose challenge- Day 18 - May 25, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

What do you use to take photographs?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google