Local

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Scathing reports kept from staff

Social workers in dark until inquiry called

By: Carol Sanders

Posted: 02/5/2013 1:00 AM | Comments: 0 | Last Modified: 02/5/2013 9:42 AM | Updates

Jay Rodgers, the former boss of social workers involved in the Phoenix Sinclair case, told the inquiry CFS was in turmoil in the years before the girl's death in 2005. (BORIS MINKEVICH / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS) Photo Store

Related Items

Columns
- What about criminal charges?

SOCIAL workers who mishandled the Phoenix Sinclair case never saw three separate reports critical of their work until an inquiry into her 2005 death was ordered in 2011.

Their former boss, who now oversees the General Authority, said it wasn't up to him to share the findings with the workers and, if it was, he may not have.

"I'm not sure I would support entire reports being shared with all staff who worked on a case," Jay Rodgers said. The reports weren't written to judge the competence of individual workers, he said.

The reports were written by the chief medical examiner, the Office of the Children's Advocate and an internal review was written for CFS after the five-year-old's body was discovered buried at the Fisher River First Nation dump in 2006. Rodgers said he believed senior managers received copies of the often-scathing reports. They could have used the findings and recommendations as a learning opportunity and to have discussions with staff, he said.

But they didn't. The workers involved didn't see the reports until after the province ordered a public inquiry into Phoenix's death.

"None were shown the findings or made aware of their involvement prior to participating in this inquiry," commission counsel Sherri Walsh told Rodgers. Several testified earlier it might have helped them do a better job if they'd seen the reports' findings.

"By not discussing with staff their involvement with the family... how did the agency expect staff would improve or make changes to their performance?" she asked.

Rodgers deferred to Darlene MacDonald, who took over from him as the CEO of Winnipeg Child and Family Services in 2006 and would've decided what to do with the reports on Phoenix.

MacDonald, who now runs the Office of the Children's Advocate, testifies today. Before the inquiry began in September, she was critical of its price tag and suggested the money could be better spent on providing services.

Rodgers told the inquiry Monday it's not too late to learn from the aging reports on the Phoenix case.

"On a going-forward basis, I would like to explore this with my agency directors. We should take full advantage of those learning opportunities."

Rogers became head of the General Authority in 2007 after devolution and a reorganization of the child-welfare system.

He stickhandled some of the upheaval in the child-welfare system while Phoenix was in and out of care from the time she was born in 2000 and after she died in 2005. Phoenix was on and off CFS's radar screen her whole life until she was killed in 2005 by her mother, Samantha Kematch, and stepfather, Karl "Wes" McKay. Kematch and McKay were convicted of murder in 2008.

Rodgers testified Monday the system has improved since then. "I believe the service system we have today has seen enormous enhancements," he said. The next phase of the inquiry is expected to look at the changes that have occurred in greater detail.

Still, the front lines of child protection will never be an easy place to work, he said. "No matter what, child welfare is very difficult work."

carol.sanders@freepress.mb.ca

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition February 5, 2013 A3

History

Updated on Tuesday, February 5, 2013 at 9:42 AM CST: replaces photo

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required

In which story did you find the error? *
Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.
What was the error? *
Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.
What should we have written?
Please indicate your source for the correct information.
Who else should we interview to improve this story?
Please include any contact information you may have.
Can we contact you in the future for advice on stories about this topic?
Yes

No
First Name: *
Last Name: *
E–mail Address: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Phone: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Colour:
Are you blue? If you can see this, leave it blank and get some CSS support.
Enter the words that you see: * This is to prevent our forms from being filled out automatically.
You have failed to correctly identify the words in the box above. Please try again.

More Local

Undock

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.