Local

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Sounding off about division amalgamation

By: Staff Writer

15/05/2009 1:00 AM | Comments: 2

A Free Press story last Sunday speculating on what one city-wide school division would be like certainly pushed buttons. Reaction so far is running about three to one in favour of giving it a try, with several parents pointing to the possibility of economies of scale allowing high schools to specialize, especially in music and dance. Here's a sampling of reaction:

"You also compared this large division to the regional health authorities. I have never seen any proof that the health authorities have saved money."

-- Walter Badger

"I would like to see one high school specializing in sports and perhaps another high school specializing in dance (ballet)."

-- Gail Rau

"I lived in Edmonton for 12 years, where my children started school, and the one-board system works much better than the hodge podge of boards that exists in Winnipeg. The problem with the current system is that everyone is too focused on protecting their own turf, with the result that the big picture for the common good gets lost... or not developed at all."

-- Julie Bubnick

"Since my first letter to the editor on this matter (Hold the taxes, reduce trustees -- sent Dec. 8, 1999), I have continually called for one school division for Winnipeg. Perhaps Premier Gary Doer will now get this message."

-- Issie D. Oiring

"Political will and vision. Manitoba politicians lack both and therefore I do not think it will come about."

-- Code Clements

"The current system has been totally unfair for the student and the homeowner. Certainly the students shouldn't suffer because of more dollars per student in one division over another. Just because I decide to live in one part of the city versus another should not result in my family being penalized with higher taxes."

-- Bruce W. Wolfe

"Wow, you really got my attention when you mentioned schools specializing in science, dance, languages, etc. To be able to give our schools back to the students so that they could become excited about going to school each and every day would be wonderful. What my Grade 12 son could (have) done with a school that specialized in music!"

-- Linda Bontey

I do not agree with any more amalgamation. With big boards, it would not be possible for trustees to be in touch with and accountable to parents/taxpayers. It is unlikely we would know our trustee rep like we did before the 2002 amalgamation. Even that one was too much."

-- Margaret Jones

"From a cultural, physical and economic perspective, Winnipeg's communities and neighbourhoods are noted for their diversity. Amalgamation of school divisions will not reconcile the different expectations of these communities."

-- John G. Kubi

"The larger the division, the more difficult it becomes to meet individual student needs, which is what education should be all about. Past school amalgamations have not saved money and have become more impersonal."

-- Annette Beauchamp

"The funding disparities noted in your article are criminal. Other jurisdictions fund on a per-head basis, provincewide, period."

-- David and Sheri Mackinder

"I am a teacher and found this very interesting. I laugh at the comments that suggest it wouldn't save any money or it wouldn't be good for the kids. Those comments almost always come from employees or trustees in the most highly paid positions and it is very obvious that they feel threatened by this."

-- Aime Gautron

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition May 15, 2009 B3

Rate this
This article has not yet been rated.

We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

2 Comments

Posted by: morebs

May 17, 2009 at 10:43 AM

Aime Gautron "laughs at" suggestions that amalgamation wouldn't save money. Aime, could you please provide an example of an instance in public service where amalgamation has saved money? [And P.S. you're right about the loudest cries coming from those whose jobs will be redundant... but a money saver?... I don't think so!]

Report abusive comment

Posted by: ManitobaResident

May 15, 2009 at 7:13 AM

Larger scale divisions and 100% Provincial funding is now the norm in every other province in Canada. In 1870 Louis Riel recognized the value of joining confederation - we were the first then, why are we last now? Once upon a time we were the leaders of education reform, now we race to meet the basic requirements of education with massive discrepancies in the amounts spent on a per student basis throughout the Province. Divisions with low enrollment, or low property values, cannot offer the same educational opportunities as other, richer divisions can. The "open emrollment" policy was supposed to eliminate that - but try and get your child into a school outside your catchment area! Education is an investment in our children, our future, and by limiting educational programs based on residency and economic ability is archaic. Ultimately, who is hurt - our children, our future. Almagamation for the Province, not just the City of Winnipeg, is way over due.