Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Advertising/Promotional Content

Special Coverage

    1. Canine
      Idol
    2. image
    3. Voting now open for your favourite Canine Idol
    1. Bid on
      signed
      guitar
    2. image
    3. Support Raise a Reader by bidding on guitar autographed by Doc Walker
    1. Blue Bomber Report
    2. image
    3. Explore breaking Bomber news and archived stories and video

More Special Coverage

Poll

What is your priority issue in this election? [Read about it here]

Day care

Afghanistan

Economy

Health care

Green shift

Other

View Results

Alerts

    1. Editor’s Bulletin
    2. With Margo Goodhand
    1. Send us your video
    2. Upload breaking news clips
    1. Insiders Reader Panel
    2. Join Today!
Advertisement

Local News

Global WinnipegBudget delay threatened

Tories, Liberals demand Doer fire finance minister

MANITOBA opposition parties have issued an ultimatum to Premier Gary Doer -- fire the finance minister or the legislature will be immobilized.

Tory Leader Hugh McFadyen and Liberal Leader Jon Gerrard hand-delivered a written warning to the premier's office on Tuesday.

Enlarge Image Enlarge Image icon

Conservative Leader Hugh McFadyen and Liberal Leader Jon Gerrard delivered an ultimatum to the premier.

Global WinnipegClick here for video

They issued their threat even though it was also revealed Tuesday that they were wrong a day earlier in accusing Finance Minister Greg Selinger of withholding a cabinet briefing note from the Crocus Investment Fund audit. The note warned of an impending cash crunch in the fund.

Selinger slammed the opposition leaders on Tuesday over the false allegation.

"If they have any decency at all they'll apologize," said Selinger. "We in no way interfered with the auditor's investigation. We gave them full access to everything including cabinet documents."

Former auditor Jon Singleton -- who actually did the Crocus review -- said Monday he had no memory of the briefing note. But current auditor general Carol Bellringer checked the files and wrote to Selinger Tuesday to let him know the briefing note was in fact among the documents compiled for the Crocus audit, which took place in the first six months of 2005.

McFadyen said Selinger's credibility has been damaged by the very existence of the briefing note, regardless of whether he supplied it to the audit. McFadyen said any budget Selinger introduces will also lack credibility.

"We wanted to put the premier on notice at the earliest opportunity that he has an opportunity to change his finance minister without any disruption to budget preparation," said McFadyen. "We very much hope we won't have to take any steps. He's got five weeks."

McFadyen and Gerrard said they will stay within the rules as they delay government business, but they wouldn't say whether they would ring the bells again.

It will be the second time the Crocus fund halted government business. Last spring, the Tories and Liberals held up the budget for more than seven weeks by repeatedly challenging the Speaker and ringing the legislature's bells for hours every day.

At that point they were demanding a public inquiry into Crocus. They've now added Selinger's job to their list.

The briefing note -- made public last weekend after it was leaked by an anonymous source -- outlines a request by Crocus management to alter the fund's governing legislation to address a looming cash-flow problem.

In the note, Selinger said the request was in effect asking to use money from new investors to pay off old investors.

The opposition parties allege the note is proof the government could have acted to protect Crocus shareholders four years before the fund eventually collapsed.

McFadyen laughed off Selinger's request for an apology and Gerrard said he needed to see the letter from Bellringer before saying anything further.

But both of them said the fact that the auditor had the briefing note doesn't change the fact that Selinger failed to warn investors the Crocus fund was in trouble despite knowing it was facing cash problems four years before it collapsed.

More than 33,000 investors lost money when the Crocus fund halted trading in December 2004.

Singleton laid most blame for the Crocus fund's problems on poor management and out of control spending by the fund's executives, but he also slammed the government in his report, saying they failed to properly monitor the fund and missed a series of "red flags" warning the fund was in trouble.

A spokesman for Selinger said the opposition parties threats to delay the budget shows they are willing to play petty politics with taxpayers dollars.

University of Manitoba politics professor Paul Thomas said they are likely hoping to crystallize public opinion against the NDP on one example of the government being "asleep at the switch."

But Thomas said it's unlikely Doer will sacrifice Selinger at this point because doing so would make the premier and the government look weak.

And an endless delay in government business will upset voters, who are already disengaged and distrustful of politicians.

"Up to a point the public will tolerate these tactics," said Thomas. "People are turned off by the negative theatrics of it all and they don't want to see it."

mia.rabson@freepress.mb.ca

How can the opposition delay a budget when the government has a majority?

THE most popular and easiest method is to use procedural rules. As University of Manitoba politics professor Paul Thomas says: "The rules are kind of like weapons in a partisan battle."

When any member of the legislature takes issue with a point made by any other member, he can rise on a point of order to the Speaker and cite an infraction of the rules.

The Speaker will decide if it is a legitimate point of order. In the vast majority of cases, the points of order are denied.

Opposition members can raise points of order they know will be denied, and then challenge the Speaker's ruling and ask for a recorded vote of all members. That requires the bells to ring for one hour to call all the members back to the house for the vote.

When the vote takes place, the opposition members call another point of order and the process repeats itself until the house rises for the day at 5 p.m.

It means there can be no debate on any government business including the budget or legislation. It can be used to prevent a budget from being introduced.

When has this tactic been used in the past?

* So many time-consuming stalling tactics were used during the French-language debate in 1984 that a ruling was made to restrict bell ringing.

* In 1988, the tactic was used to fight against final offer selection legislation for settlement of labour disputes.

* In 1996, the NDP also used stalling tactics to oppose the Filmon government's decision to privatize MTS.

* In 2006, the Tories and Liberals rang the bells and delayed the passing of the provincial budget for more than seven weeks. They wanted the government to call a public inquiry into the Crocus Investment Fund.

Advertisement

Top Jobs

» All Jobs
Advertisement