Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Advertising/Promotional Content

Special Coverage

    1. Election 2008
    2. image
    3. Full local and national coverage, profiles, blogs and more.
    1. Breeding for Bucks
    2. image
    3. In an undercover investigation, Free Press reporter Selena Hinds and photojournalist Mike Aporius explore Manitoba's rampant backyard breeder problem.
    1. Canine
      Idol
    2. image
    3. Voting now open for your favourite Canine Idol

More Special Coverage

Poll

When the votes are counted on Oct. 14, do you think Canada will have a majority government? [Read about it here]

Yes

No

View Results

Alerts

    1. Editor’s Bulletin
    2. With Margo Goodhand
    1. Send us your video
    2. Upload breaking news clips
    1. Insiders Reader Panel
    2. Join Today!
Advertisement

Local News

Star witness turns out to be career criminal

Crown unaware 88 convictions wiped out by pardon

MANITOBA justice officials had no idea their "star" witness in a sex-assault case was actually a career criminal when they struck a controversial plea bargain that spared him jail for impregnating a mentally disabled Winnipeg woman.

Kenneth Allan, 70, appeared to hit the legal jackpot last year when he admitted to his crime and left court with a conditional sentence.

Justice officials explained their deal with Allan on the grounds they needed him to testify against his co-accused, the victim's former respite worker who allegedly coerced the victim, who has the mental capacity of a six-year-old, into the sexual relationship.

They also cited Allan's complete lack of a prior criminal record as the basis for such a lenient sentence.

But now the plea bargain -- and Allan's credibility -- have been rocked with the revelation he has had 88 prior convictions in his lifetime.

Crimes

His many crimes -- which occurred between 1954 and 1990 -- have included robbery, assault causing bodily harm, weapons possession, drugs, escaping custody, break-and-enter, theft and an indecent assault against a young woman.

Allan has been given more than 25 years of prison time in his life and served nearly half of it. There have also been four separate parole violations, which landed him back behind bars.

Yet none of this information was apparently known to the Crown when they struck the deal with Allan. That's because he was able to obtain a pardon from the National Parole Board a few years earlier, which wiped his criminal slate clean.

Justice officials only learned of it recently when the parole board, citing Allan's sex assault guilty plea from last year, revoked his pardon and reinstated his entire criminal record.

Crown attorney Dave Mann explained the situation on Wednesday as Allan was called to testify against the ex-respite worker now on trial for sexually assaulting a person with a disability.

An employee with a Vancouver company specializing in pardons told the Free Press Wednesday that obtaining a pardon for more than a handful of crimes is rare.

"I've never seen 88 (offences) ever, in my life, and I've worked on thousands of cases myself," said Jared Church, operations manager for Pardon Services Canada.

"I would say that's very much the exception to the rule."

Allan told court he was shocked when the young woman and her respite worker first came to his home in 2001 on the premise of doing some cleaning. He had previously dated the accused.

"I walked into the bedroom and both of them were in bed. They were naked. (The accused) was laying on top of (the victim)," said Allan.

He said the accused invited him to join them in bed and then forced the victim to begin fondling him. That led to sexual intercourse.

He paid the accused $50 before the victim left, admitting Wednesday it was for both the cleaning and the sex.

Allan said the women returned about a month later for a similar visit. He had sex with the mentally disabled women and paid the respite worker $30, despite the fact they hadn't done any cleaning for him that day.

It was weeks later Allan learned the victim was pregnant, but he remained silent about his relations with her.

Allan claims the accused began blackmailing him, demanding he pay her $800 or she would go to the police with the truth about the pregnancy. He refused.

The victim, now 27, is unable to testify because of her diminished mental capacity. Her mother was the Crown's first witness at trial and described the shock of finding out her daughter was pregnant.

"We had no idea how (her daughter) could have gotten pregnant," said the woman, whose name isn't being published to protect the identity of the victim.

The victim gave birth to a baby boy in March 2002, with the circumstances of the pregnancy still a bizarre mystery.

That changed when an anonymous phone call was made to Winnipeg police in April 2003, claiming Allan was the father of the victim's baby. Police eventually ran a DNA test that confirmed his fatherhood.

www.mikeoncrime.com

His record

MANITOBA Justice thought Kenneth Allan had a squeaky-clean criminal record when they struck a controversial plea bargain with him last year.

In fact, Allan has a lengthy criminal record that dates back to 1954 and includes 88 convictions for crimes including:

* More than 50 break-and-enters

* Indecent assault

* Assault causing bodily harm

* Endangering life

* Escaping custody

* Robbery

* Theft

* Four parole violations

Allan has been sentenced to more than 25 total years in prison. His final crime -- prior to the sex assault he admitted to last year -- was for a theft in 1990.

b>How pardons work

HOW HARD IS IT TO GET ONE?

EASIER than you might think, provided you meet the right criteria. Plenty of companies will make the application for you, but anyone with $50 and a criminal record can apply to the National Parole Board, as long as their convictions weren't life sentences.

DOES PARDON EQUAL CLEAN SLATE?

NOT quite. A pardon doesn't mean your criminal record is erased, only that it won't show up in the Canadian Police Information Centre (CPIC) -- a federally run database for police across the country. People with pardons still have to admit to past convictions, but can mention they've been pardoned.

WHAT'S THE CRITERIA?

PARDONS are decided on a case-by-case basis, but the basic requirements are a few years of good behaviour and no further convictions. For lesser offences, you'd have to wait three years after completing your sentence before applying. For indictable offences, like manslaughter or rape, the wait time is five years.

In both cases, applicants can't receive any other convictions during the wait period. And for indictable offences, police will also investigate behaviour to make sure the applicant hasn't had any run-ins with the law.

WHAT ABOUT MULTIPLE OFFENDERS, OR PEOPLE WITH SERIOUS OFFENCES?

THERE'S no limit on how many convictions an applicant can have, and no crimes are deemed too serious for pardon. However, applicants who've been hit with life sentences -- often the case with particularly serious crimes -- are automatically ineligible.

WHAT ABOUT SEX OFFENCES?

Most sex offences are supposed to result in a 'flag' on your record, even with an official pardon. This means police can still see sex offences in the CIPC database.

HOW MANY APPLICATIONS ARE OK'D?

ALMOST all of them. National Parole Board communications officer Nadine Archambault said 97 to 98 per cent of all pardon applications are approved -- but most people who apply meet the criteria in the first place.

ARE PARDONS EVER REVOKED?

YES, if the recipient gets in trouble with police, receives a new conviction or is found to have made a false or deceptive statement.

-- Lindsey Wiebe, with files from National Parole Board and Pardon

Services Canada

Advertisement

Top Jobs

» All Jobs
Advertisement