Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Advertising/Promotional Content

Special Coverage

    1. Election 2008
    2. image
    3. Full local and national coverage, profiles, blogs and more.
    1. Breeding for Bucks
    2. image
    3. In an undercover investigation, Free Press reporter Selena Hinds and photojournalist Mike Aporius explore Manitoba's rampant backyard breeder problem.
    1. Blue Bomber Report
    2. image
    3. Explore breaking Bomber news and archived stories and video

More Special Coverage

Poll

Do you agree with the decision to have RCMP take over the East St. Paul police force? [Read about it here]

Yes

No

Don't care

View Results

Alerts

    1. Editor’s Bulletin
    2. With Margo Goodhand
    1. Send us your video
    2. Upload breaking news clips
    1. Insiders Reader Panel
    2. Join Today!
Advertisement

Local News

Fish $4M in debt, Katz says

Mayor goes on offensive in Crocus controversy

THE Winnipeg Goldeyes made a profit last year but are about $4 million in debt, majority owner Sam Katz said, responding to criticism about a sworn statement claiming the ball club can't afford to repay the Crocus Investment Fund's receiver.

After four days of getting publicly hammered over his assertion the baseball franchise is not financially capable of paying interest on $434,000 in Crocus loans, Katz went on the offensive, claiming Winnipeg media are deliberately confusing the public about a complex legal issue.

"It was pretty sad and pathetic when I heard people try to make the Winnipeg Goldeyes baseball club the scapegoat for the millions lost by Crocus shareholders," said Katz, rejecting the notion the ball club has compounded the financial woes of investors in the disastrous fund, which was placed in receivership in 2005.

"Of course I feel bad for anybody who invested their hard-earned money on Crocus. But don't even put the Winnipeg Goldeyes in the same category of investments that lost them $5 million, $10 million or $20 million. Because guess what? The Goldeyes haven't lost them a nickel."

The mayor claimed he never intended to suggest his Northern League of Baseball franchise is unprofitable when he said in a sworn affidavit that the team can't afford to repay Crocus "until such time as the Goldeyes can have a financially viable season."

He made the statement this April in response to a lawsuit filed by Crocus in late 2006.

"That line in the affidavit is not for public consumption," Katz said. "It's for the courts to decide."

Made a profit

Katz said the Winnipeg Goldeyes turned a profit last year, but declined to name a dollar figure, stating the team's shareholders are well aware of the amount. It's too soon to say whether the team is in the black or red in 2007, he added.

But thanks to the club's ballpark lease and purchases of new equipment such as a $1-million scoreboard, the team remains $4 million in debt, he said, noting weather and other intangibles play havoc with the team's finances. There are about 16 years remaining on the lease, after which CanWest Global Park returns to the city.

He offered no timetable for a Goldeyes repayment to Crocus, repeating his lawyer Robert Tapper's assertion that the fund made equity investments in the team and did not provide it with loans.

Katz said he's not surprised the public is confused about the ball club's financial arrangement with Crocus, and suggested the Winnipeg news media are not properly explaining the intricacies of the three-way Goldeyes-Crocus deal, which also involves Winnipeg businessman Sandy Shindleman.

"There's no question this is a complex deal, but it's not that complex -- you have an equity investment, you have an equity investment; you have a loan, you have a loan.

"I didn't even understand all this stuff, so I would expect the average person on the street to just pick up what someone says or writes."

In that regard, he angrily rejected the notion that his $217,000 Goldeyes salary -- or a $60,000 salary paid by the team to his estranged wife Baillie Burke -- has any connection to the Crocus affair.

Makes less than other CEOs

He said he makes "significantly less" than other CEOs of Winnipeg sports franchises, taking an apparent shot at Winnipeg Blue Bombers president and CEO Lyle Bauer.

Katz suggested the Crocus receiver launched a lawsuit against his baseball club as a diversionary tactic.

"There's no doubt in my mind why the receiver took this type of action, as opposed to having the focus on them for some of their actions," Katz said.

"There's a much bigger story to Crocus than most people understand today, but I'm sure that'll come out down the road."

Katz said his lawyers advised him not to speak publicly about the Goldeyes-Crocus affair, but he was motivated to take the offensive when he heard repeated assertions his baseball team has caused further financial hardship for Crocus investors.

As a result, he spent part of Thursday sparring with broadcast media personalities, and the tone was decidedly less cosy than usual.

"Mr. Mayor, are you here to offer an apology to the people of Winnipeg, those who trusted you with (their) vote in not one but two civic elections?" CJOB radio host Richard Cloutier asked Katz at the top of a morning interview.

"Richard, are you here to offer an apology for -- what shall we say -- a drive-by shooting yesterday?" Katz responded.

bartley.kives@freepress.mb.ca

Say it again, Sam

As the Goldeyes-Crocus controversy enters its fifth day, Mayor Sam Katz speaks ...

On what he meant when he swore in an affidavit that the Winnipeg Goldeyes can't pay the receiver for the Crocus Investment Fund "until such time as the Goldeyes can have a financially viable season":

"There's a big difference between profit and cash flow, and most people don't understand that."

On the size of the Winnipeg Goldeyes' debt:

"We're talking millions. About $4 million."

On when the Winnipeg Goldeyes plan to repay the Crocus Investment Fund's receiver:

"When someone gets paid is when they want to sell their interest."

On Crocus investors who lost money when the fund ceased trading:

"Of course I feel bad for anybody who invested their hard-earned money on Crocus. But don't even put the Winnipeg Goldeyes in the same category of investments that lost them $5 million, $10 million, or $20 million. Because guess what? The Goldeyes haven't lost them a nickel. So why are we even having this discussion?"

On how Crocus conducted business before the fund was frozen:

"There's a much bigger story to Crocus than most people understand today, but I'm sure that'll come out down the road."

On whether a Crocus inquiry should be called:

"It's not up to me to say whether there should be. I just have one man's opinion. You know who has to make that decision. It's not up to me."

On the $217,000 salary he draws as the majority owner of the Winnipeg Goldeyes:

"You want to talk about my salary? Well, my salary is less than the CEOs of other sports franchises in this city make -- significantly less. Who cares? It is what it is."

On the outrage expressed by Winnipeggers that the Goldeyes paid a $60,000-a-year salary to his estranged wife Baillie Burke, but did not pay the Crocus receiver:

"I say to them it's very unfortunate a couple of media outlets have given that impression. It's totally incorrect (to link the two)."

On the notion it's the right thing to do for the Goldeyes to repay Crocus:

"It was pretty sad and pathetic when I heard people try to make the Winnipeg Goldeyes baseball club the scapegoat for the millions lost by Crocus shareholders."

On whether his dual roles as mayor and a Goldeyes owner present a problem:

"I challenge you to look at any previous mayors and find out who spends more time in the office than yours truly."

On the criticism he's received since taking office as a result of those dual roles:

"If you need a target, I'm here. It's not what I want to be, but I have no problem doing it. And better it should be me than others who probably could not handle it."

On whether this has been his worst week in office since first getting elected in 2004:

"You think being told you're over budget on every capital project you're working on is a good day or a good week? I'm more concerned about that than (I am about) this."

Advertisement

Top Jobs

» All Jobs
Advertisement