Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Advertising/Promotional Content
Rank my Ride link

Special Coverage

    1. When
      doctors
      say NO
    2. image
    3. How far should the health-care system go to keep Samuel Golubchuk alive?
    1. Voting open
      now
    2. image
    3. Vote for your favourite nominees
    1. Blue Bomber Report
    2. image
    3. Explore breaking Bomber news and archived stories and video.

More Special Coverage

Poll

Should the province expedite plans to pave the shoulders on the Trans-Canada Highway?

Yes

No

View Results

Advertisement

Local News

Court quashes part of Driskell's civil lawsuit

The Manitoba Court of Appeal struck down a section of a $20-million civil lawsuit against the Winnipeg police officers involved in the wrongful conviction of James Driskell, but allowed the suit's main claims to continue.

The province`s high court agreed with police lawyers Driskell could not sue them for failing to directly disclose exculpatory evidence prior to his appeals being exhausted. However, the court said Driskell could continue to argue the police were negligent for failing to disclose that evidence after appeal, when Driskell was still working actively to prove his innocence.

Driskell was convicted in 1991 of the first-degree murder of Perry Dean Harder. He was released on bail in 2003 on the strength of new evidence, including an internal review report written more than a year after Driskell's appeal was turned down, which uncovered startling new facts about the case.

Driskell's conviction was quashed in 2005 by the federal justice minister. Manitoba Justice decided not to hold a second trial.

Driskell's lawyers have argued the police are negligent because they failed to divulge a raft of new evidence including the internal review report.

Police turned down numerous requests to see the report from Driskell's lawyers, wrongful conviction advocates and the Winnipeg Free Press.

Advertisement

Top Jobs

» All Jobs
Advertisement