Click here to visit the mobile version of winnipegfreepress.com

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

When personal is so much more

Siloam worker comes forward to discuss affair with former CEO

Linda Warkentin says she can sympathize with the position Siloam Mission finds itself in.

Enlarge Image

Linda Warkentin says she can sympathize with the position Siloam Mission finds itself in. (RUTH.BONNEVILLE@FREEPRESS.MB.CA )

There is privacy.

And then there is secrecy.

There are personal reasons for people to leave jobs. And there are personnel reasons that can involve personal behaviour and, potentially, damage a brand.

Unless they're handled in a transparent and timely way.

David Letterman and Tiger Woods come to mind.

Which brings me back to last Saturday's column about a charitable organization that helps some of the poorest and most vulnerable people in this city with the hundreds of thousands of dollars it raises through donations from people who care.

John Mohan's mysterious departure from Siloam Mission last month was as silent as it was sudden.

Siloam didn't publicly acknowledge the resignation of its popular leader and the main architect of one of the city's havens for the homeless until an online Christian organization asked 10 days later.

Christianweek.org also reported Mohan had surrendered his credentials as an ordained Church of the Nazarene minister.

But the brief statement that followed simply characterized Mohan's resignation as a "personal" matter.

"It's not our story to tell," said Siloam's Calgary-based board chairman, Riley Coulter. "John resigned and it's his story to tell."

But Coulter was wrong.

It's not just John Mohan's story to tell.

 

"ö "ö "ö

 

Linda Warkentin was the director of communication and development at Siloam until she resigned Nov. 21, the same day as Mohan. She was also rumoured to be the woman at the centre of the reason for Mohan's departure.

I'd never met her, but when she called we agreed to meet.

Warkentin, who's in the midst of a divorce, was in a hurry.

By Thursday, she had left the city, packing her three kids into her car, heading home to Saskatchewan to live with her parents for the next six months while she figures out what to do with the rest of her life.

So for hours Saturday night -- and again Monday -- the 38-year-old related how, gradually over her year and a half at Siloam, she had been drawn into an emotional and finally a sexual affair with 51-year-old John Mohan.

The only time she wept while telling what happened, and the consequences of what happened, was when I asked about her children.

She was clear-eyed when it came to talking about the man she reported to directly, the man she feels over time drew her into the affair while they were working alongside his wife of more than 30 years. It was his wife confronting Mohan with her suspicions on Nov. 20 that triggered Warkentin's next-day resignation.

Warkentin also claimed another woman working at Siloam had confessed to an emotional relationship with Mohan.

I heard about the second woman last week from a well-placed source within the organization. She has also now left Siloam.

The Siloam situation highlights the legal dangers in workplace relationships between a manager and subordinate and how it can risk making resignations more than personal.

The inherent danger being the power imbalance. And the potential for how that power imbalance can be used.

Warkentin said she was coming forward because she was concerned the mistake she and Mohan made -- and how Siloam had mishandled it publicly -- had harmed the mission.

She wanted to take responsibility.

"And I feel a little angry... I've lost everything."

She said she was angry with Mohan because she believed he loved her and they were going to make a life together and because he hadn't stepped forward publicly and explained why he was leaving."When I read your article, I just thought of how much work has gone into that organization... I think it's a shame for the organization to come under fire for something that I did."

But "the truth is going to come out. It always does.

"It's always better to just say what happened and everybody is sorry for it. It's a terrible mistake. And I recognize it for what it is."

Warkentin wasn't without sympathy for Siloam and its situation.

"I know the intention behind it. They're trying to protect and not cause hurt to several different people."

She said if she hadn't been involved in the affair -- and still in her former role as director of communications -- she would have recommended Mohan make a statement disclosing why he was leaving.

The week after she left, Siloam Mission's human resources manager, Vicki Olatundun, called her to a lunch at McNally Robinson Polo Park and presented her with a contract.

And a deal.

In exchange for severance pay that amounted to about $5,000, she said, Olatundun wanted her to sign a non-disclosure agreement.

She refused.

"Because it just seemed like they were asking me not to tell the truth and... I knew eventually I would have to say something, to a counsellor or someone.

"I just asked for a reference so I would be able to carry on and provide for my kids."

They are aged 13, 12 and six.

She didn't get the reference.

I asked Warkentin if the contract also included a section that, if signed, would prevent her from suing the mission.

"Yeah," she replied. "It's in there."

But Warkentin hasn't taken legal action and she said she has no intention of going to a lawyer.

"ö "ö "ö

 

There may not be anything in Siloam's policy manual about this kind of workplace relationship, but there's human rights and respectful workplace legislation.

Employment lawyer Garth Smorang couldn't speak specifically to Warkentin's allegations, but he could comment generally.

 

"There is a presumption in a workplace, that when a person in power is having a relationship with a subordinate, that the person in power may have used their power in order to create that relationship."

Smorang said sometimes these kinds of relationships -- which may be completely natural, innocent and honest -- can be accommodated by divulging them and, if appropriate, having the employer change the reporting structure.

People are human. They fall in love.

Affairs happen.

But he agreed it's not uncommon for managers, including high-level managers, to lose their jobs over situations where they are having a relationship with subordinates.

That's the result of the power imbalance between managers and employees.

And, again, how the power imbalance can be used.

He explained it's the kind of power imbalance that can happen in relationships between doctor and patient, lawyer and client and professor and student.

"You, in the context of your relationship with that person, become aware of their weakness, vulnerability or reliance on you, and if you prey upon them because of that power imbalance, that's the offence."

It can be done without direct threat, he suggested, by building up the subordinates' self worth and making them feel as if you can't do without them... but reminding them from time to time you do control their destiny.

It's that sort of subtle groundwork, Smorang says, that can lead to a relationship that can appear to be willingly embraced.

In retrospect, Warkentin doesn't feel the relationship was honest.

She feels "played" by both Mohan and the organization.

After a while, the lines began to blur. And eventually the judgment.

"There's the work-factor focus of what the work was, there was the friendship that was developed... There's a lot of levels of trust in there."

I asked what she meant by trust.

"I trusted him as my friend. I trusted him as an employer. I trusted him on a personal level."

 

"ö "ö "ö

 

Friday I called Siloam Mission's acting CEO Sherwood Armbruster and left a message saying Linda Warkentin had come forward.

An email from Moran arrived late afternoon:

Hello Gordon;

It is my understanding that you are writing a column piece based on an interview with Linda Warkentin.

Although I wish I could respond in depth to provide you with more balance and substantiation to your piece, I do acknowledge that I did have an inappropriate relationship with Linda that necessitated I step down as CEO of Siloam Mission. My actions and decisions were in violation of the best interests of Siloam Mission and brought great harm to my marriage and family.

I have been in extensive counselling, and Brenda and I are working hard to heal the damage I did to our marriage.

My deepest apologies to those I have hurt through this, but it is my hope that Siloam Mission will continue to be supported by the community for the sake of those less fortune in our city whom they serve. Our family respectfully requests as much privacy as possible as we work through this difficult time together.

Sincerely, John Mohan

 

"ö "ö "ö

 

There is privacy.

And then there is secrecy.

There are personal reasons for people to leave jobs. And there are personnel reasons that can involve personal behaviour and, potentially, damage a brand.

Unless they're handled in a transparent and timely way.

gordon.sinclair@freepress.mb.ca

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition December 19, 2009 B1

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article is currently rated an average of 3.2 out of 5 (4 votes).
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

13 Commentscomment icon

Well, will you look at this. Siloam Mission - a work of the Nazarene Church - attempts to buy her silence for $5000. Ms Warkentin just needed to sign that non-disclosure agreement. It's too bad that the affair happened - I'm a firm believer in marriage - but I'm glad she had the guts to reject the non-disclosure agreement. The use of a non-disclosure agreement is not an un-common tactic of the 'evangelical' church - they purchase silence as much as 'secular' employers do.

As a former employee, and having worked alongside with both Mr. Mohan and Ms Warkentin, I can both see how something of this nature could happen, but also how something of this nature can be misunderstood and misrepresented.

I believe anyone reading this should take it just as it is - there are facts, and then there are opinions. Believe the facts. Be cautious of opinions.

It's tragic that this has happened, and everyone involved is the victim. However, it has happened, and was dealt with expediently. Everyone had Siloam's ultimate Mission in mind, and please let it continue.

First of all, I disagree with the comment that Linda Warkentin did not take responsibility. From what Gordon has written, it seems she, of all the players, was the only one to stand up and take responsibility. John Mohan's response came only after Ms Warkentin declined the silence contract offered by the human resources person, and after she spoke with Gordon.

Second, I believe it is fair to write such a story because it involves senior management of a high profile and trusted organization. Ms Warkentin made it clear she understands that, and perhaps it is her training in public relations that motivated her to speak out, knowing that ultimately honest disclosure is what counts in maintaining credibility.

Which brings me to my final point, a question: Did the human resources person act ethically? In fact, what are the ethics for human resources? Unfortunately, often guided by lawyers, HR departments too often find themselves in an ethical gray zone, making deals wherein underlying issues and injustices are not dealt with, and silence is bought.

I'd like to see a column dealing with HR and ethics - HR people find it disparaging when someone says they're just the people who "hire and fire," that there is more to their profession than that. That being so, I submit the time has come for employers to stop using HR departments to cover questionable treatment of employees, and for HR departments to act more humanely and ethically.

Daly de Gagne

Unfortunately this story will forever be linked to the work of Siloam Mission and has completely detracted from thier work in the community - not to mention at one of thier busiest times of the year - selling newspapers should never detract from the work of a charitable organization that works as hard as Siloam does to make a difference in the lives of our city's less fortuante.

For shame.

I rarely agree with Mr. Sinclair's columns and often avoid them because they appear pompous and condescending. In this case, though, I think he has done what is right. Organizations that do good are not to be excused for the wrongs they commit. The end never justifies the means. By investigating the resignations Mr. Sinclair shows that something systemic is wrong in Siloam's upper management. A violation of decency, an abuse of power, and an attempted cover-up seem to have occurred. It is Mr. Sinclair's duty, as a responsible journalist, to report this. I hope he and other journalists continue their investigation and the board of directors of Siloam Mission takes a good, hard, honest look at how tightly the organization is managed.

...and what happened to the video? There is a multimedia link but no Warkentin interview video at the end of the rainbow.

Six comments? What happened to all the other ones? Editor's note: They were on the original version of the story.

This is absolutely disgraceful and disappointing. When did this happen.... 30 days ago? Is this some celebrity of such status that it is worth going back in time to publish people's personal screw ups? What is this the National Enquirer??? What a new low Gordon.

Why is everyone bashing Sinclair about writing the article? Linda Warkentin initiated the interview, and consented to the photo op. In the interview, she says that she wanted to take responsibility, yet in the next breath she says that she was angry with Mohan because she believed he loved her and that they were going to make a life together. Later she says, "She feels "played" by both Mohan and the organization.

Where in her sordid confessions is she taking responsibility? She's not. She is clearly trying to make herself out to be the victim. Was she not a consenting adult?

Warkentin is trained in PR, and as such, I find it interesting that she chose to mention her children in the detail that she did. She has now damaged their reputations by both her actions and her words. What was she thinking?

If the Winnipeg Free Press is really all about balanced, unbiased journalism, I challenge you to publish Mohan's side of the story, just as you've done with Warkentin's.

I thought what really mattered was feeding and sheltering the homeless. Why on earth does anyone care about this? Turns out even religious folks are human. Who knew? More mindless pap from Gord Sinclair.

The comment period for this story has ended.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Special coverage

Poll

Should the province spend $3.1 million to keep Greyhound inter-city bus service in Manitoba?

View Results

View Related Story