Click here to visit the mobile version of winnipegfreepress.com

Winnipeg Free Press > Local > Wind farm cash demanded

Local

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Wind farm cash demanded

First Nations want stake in $800-M deal

By: Mary Agnes Welch

6/04/2009 1:00 AM | Comments: 13

Much like they've paralyzed the redevelopment of Kapyong Barracks, Treaty One First Nations are threatening to tie up the province's massive new wind farm in court unless they're included in the $800-million dollar deal.

Aboriginal leader Terry Nelson says the wind farm will be located about 10 kilometres from his reserve at Roseau River on land that seven First Nations consider their traditional territory.

If there's no proper consultation and a fair deal to share revenue, Nelson said he will ask the courts for the same kind of judicial review now stalling the Kapyong Barracks redevelopment.

"We would rather settle out of court or work with governments, but it has been 138 years of frustration," said Nelson, who is himself mired in a bitter band election for chief.

"The 1871 Treaty One territory is like any other property deal. When the one who buys or leases the land doesn't pay or reneges on the legal obligations, the original owners have legal recourse."

The move could kibosh the Doer government's promise to build 1,000 megawatts of wind power over the next few years.

Last fall, Manitoba Hydro's board approved a deal with Australian mega-firm Babcock and Brown and Alberta-based BowArk Energy to build the province's second wind farm -- a 300-megawatt one near St. Joseph in southern Manitoba. It will be the biggest wind farm in Canada, if it ever gets built.

Babcock and Brown's Colin Edwards said he's not sure what claim the bands would have on the St. Joseph site, since every turbine is slated to go on private, not Crown, land.

The company has been meeting with Roseau River to explain the project and perhaps work on ensuring employment for some First Nations people.

But Edwards said his company would not be interested in sharing revenue with the bands.

Manitoba Hydro buys the power from the wind farm, puts it on the grid, and then sells it to Manitobans, Americans, and other provinces.

Hydro chief executive officer Bob Brennan said he understands the desire of impoverished bands to glean revenues from local projects.

But he's not sure the Treaty One bands have a claim.

Nelson, the long-time chief of Roseau River, is easily the province's most controversial aboriginal leader. He is currently in a protracted dispute with Felix Antoine, a rival for chief. Both claim victory in separate elections that were held March 2 and no resolution to the stalemate appears imminent.

But Nelson's stand on the wind farm appears to have the support of other chiefs in the Treaty One area.

Long Plain First Nation Chief Dennis Meeches says the threat of a court challenge is part of an aggressive new strategy to force Ottawa to deal with thousands of acres of outstanding land claims.

"We are challenging the government on all fronts. We can't afford to sit back and be passive any more, It's just not part of our game plan now," said Meeches.

"It's tough for us to see our standard of living flatlined for decades while everyone else's had gotten better."

Meeches said First Nations must be involved in major projects on their traditional land so they can share in the economic rewards.

Finance Minister Greg Selinger, who is in charge of Manitoba Hydro, could not be reached Friday, but provincial officials say the Doer government has been in contact with First Nations in the area to talk about the wind farm. The province encourages Roseau to keep meeting with Babcock & Brown.

 

maryagnes.welch@freepress.mb.ca

Three major projects facing possible delays

SEVEN bands that are signatories to the 1871 Treaty One have held up or are threatening to hold up at least three major construction projects in Manitoba. The bands say they are due a share of the revenues or the land itself as payment for outstanding land claims. The court challenges have cost taxpayers millions in lost revenue and lawyers fees, but First Nations say inconvenience and financial burden don't trump rights entrenched in the Constitution.

 

Pipelines

WHAT IT IS: Three oil pipelines through southwestern Manitoba -- one built by TransCanada, and two built by Enbridge.

WHAT FIRST NATIONS WANT: A share of the oil revenue due to Ottawa, though there's no dollar figure attached to that.

STATUS: Last year, the seven Treaty One bands asked the federal court for a judicial review of the pipelines to determine whether Ottawa did right by First Nations by approving the projects. A hearing was held in January. The court's decision is expected soon, but construction has continued.

 

Kapyong Barracks

WHAT IT IS: The old home of the Princess Pats in River Heights, abandoned in 2004 and left vacant ever since. It was supposed to be sold to Canada Lands so the Crown development firm could turn it into a snazzy new neighbourhood.

WHAT FIRST NATIONS WANT: The barracks to be given to them as part of outstanding land claims so they can create an urban reserve with housing, educational facilities, and businesses to lift their people out of poverty.

STATUS: In limbo. Ownership of the barracks can't be transferred to Canada Lands until a court challenge filed by the First Nations is resolved. A key hearing is scheduled for late May, but it could be a few months after that before a federal court judge makes a decision.

 

St. Joseph Wind Farm

WHAT IT IS: The province's big new farm in southern Manitoba. 300 megawatts. 130 turbines. $800 million. Built by an Australian mega-company and its Calgary partners that will sell the wind power to Manitoba Hydro.

WHAT FIRST NATIONS WANT: A share of the revenues from the wind farm, which they say will be built on their traditional land.

STATUS: The project is going ahead, but First Nations have threatened to take their complaints to court. It remains to be seen if that will actually happen.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition April 6, 2009 A6

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.

    • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

13 Commentscomment icon

Perhaps the waters that pass through the traditional lands that are now flooding Winnipeg are also the responsibility of Treaty one too? hey have already tried to claim cell phone signals and the wind. Where do we send the bill?

This from the man who arranged for many Roseau River people to spend a weekend in a Winnipeg Hotel for fear of flooding. I wonder what the "tab" was for that? Manitoba is already one of the most excessively taxed provinces. There has to be real changes that motivate and empower them to do their part in making Canada a better country. It will take leadership. It's not about money--It's about people.

Keep up the good work Treaty One First Nations. Maybe if you are successful you could help set back any progress towards more sustainable energy. Thwarting sustainable development must be part of the deep connection to the earth I always hear about First Nations people having.

Then Meeches goes on to say their standard of living has flatlined while everyone elses has gotten better. My standard of living has gotten better because I went out, and found progressively better jobs, invested, worked hard and saved. Outside forces including other peoples hard work are not the appropriate means by which to increase your standard of living. Every individual is responsible for their own destiny. There are many opportunities in this country, even during the recession.

Terry Nelson: two wrongs don't make a right. Get with the program.

I love the way Terry Nelson negotiates: "You owe my people (meaning "me"). I'm thinking of a number between one and infinity. Whatever you say will be an outrageous insult and need to be at least doubled."

I can't imagine why it is difficult to encourage outside investment and the retention of young, talented people in Manitoba. Who wouldn't want to move here and invest? Why not expose yourself to the risk of having everything you have earned arbitrarily seized and given away to your neighbors just because you are not the right race?!?

lwj01998 - I'm glad you posted on Chief Clarence Louie - he is what true leadership is all about - having vision, recognizing the issues, taking responsibility and control and having the strength and courage to execute.

Here's another article:

http://dcnonl.com/article/id33070

Louie is absolutely right "Today, economic development is the new battleground". Other than further alienation and anomosity, Nelson and Meeches really need to ask what they have accomplished for their own people. Perhaps a more progressive approach - trying to work together through partnership might prove to be more fruitful rather than throwing up constant road blocks and threats?

As soon as I seen the headline and only the headline, I thought. "I bet this is another "Terry Nelson" idea. And sure enough.
Instead of dreaming up ways to capitalize on the investments of others he should be following the lead of Chief Clarence Louis. Empower the people rather than set up roadblocks to green projects.
http://www.naaf.ca/html/c_louis_e.html

This band is located within an hours drive of Winnipeg. There is no reason why they cannot have some type of industry or agriculture on their land. The Hutterites have diversified interest in agriculture and manufacturing, why can't the Aboriginals participate? Generational welfare is ruining their livelihoods. AND, many Manitobans would be proud to purchase products made locally, we would support your endeavors!!

I'm getting very tired of these "treaty "claims". As a property owner, once you sell something, and others find "gold" on the land, you no longer have claim to the "gold". So should it be with treaty land. You gave it up for something else. If you were properly paid for it, or have leased it out, and are getting your "rent" then you are being fairly compensated. If you never got what was agreed to, then you have a legal claim. Were the people who signed the treaties paid, or are they being paid? THAT IS THE QUESTION.
I don't like when people say "My forefathers were ignorant and didn't know what they were signing." And then they call this cheating their people. C'mon now. Surely there were honest people around in those days that could, would & did help the aborginal treaty signers understand what was in the treaties. And YES, legalize is very difficult to understand, even today.
As the saying goes "render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's!" That is, give them what is owed to them. AND NOTHING MORE!!!

...if, as Dennis Meeches says, "...everyone else's [standard of living] had gotten better...," should one at least consider doing things the way "everyone else" does?

View all Comments

The comment period for this story has ended.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Special coverage

Our Communities

Poll

Should the province spend $3.1 million to keep Greyhound inter-city bus service in Manitoba?

View Results

View Related Story