Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Labour chicken comes home to roost in Brandon

  • Print

The CHICKENS are coming home to roost. The Manitoba labour movement has expressed outrage because Labour Minister Jennifer Howard has used statutory authority to order that the union representing professors on strike at Brandon University conduct a vote to accept or reject the university's last settlement offer. This is clearly an interference with the internal affairs of a union. An employer is prohibited from making such a demand under the Labour Act. It is also a blatant interference with the principle of free collective bargaining.

This should come as no surprise to Manitoba labour. Free collective bargaining does not exist in Manitoba. What is ironic is that free collective bargaining was created by New Democratic Party governments at the instigation of the Manitoba labour movement.

Some history. It was the tradition of the free-enterprise Liberal and Conservative governments to gradually erode the free collective bargaining rights of employees by enacting labour statutes that purported to preserve the rights of employees to withdraw their services but which effectively compromise these rights by mandating limitations such as conciliation and other requirements.

The position of the NDP in opposition was to remove the impediments to free collective bargaining by amendments to the labour legislation and by legislation preventing interference by the courts.

When the NDP came to power in 1969, it indeed made good on its position and drastically altered the Labour Act so as to bring it much more closely to the realization of the principle of free collective bargaining.

But free collective bargaining involves responsibilities. Under conditions of free collective bargaining, a union can lose a strike and employees can lose their jobs. Under free collective bargaining, an employer can see its business destroyed.

These terrible consequences are the effective inducements to reasonable bargaining on behalf of employers and employees.

If these consequences are removed and neither side can be hurt by a strike or lockout, responsible collective bargaining is effectively removed in difficult cases.

After relatively free collective bargaining had been restored by the Schreyer government, some unions in Manitoba found it not to their liking.

They did not want a "hands-off" policy in labour relations. They believed that the NDP, of which they were a constituent part, should not be neutral but should design legislation that would come to their aid when they were in dispute with their employer.

So began a series of demands and moves by the labour movement to eliminate the concept of free collective bargaining.

The involvement of the labour minister in this dispute is one of the features of the legislation that came about as a result of the impairment of the principle of free collective bargaining. If the act did not contain these provisions, the union and the employer bargaining positions would be drastically changed. Each side now bargains on the premise that if no agreement is reached, the act can be used to impose terms and conditions of employment which are not satisfactory to either side.

If the parties knew that this would not happen and that in the absence of agreement there would be a serious adverse consequences to one or the other, or both sides, discussions at the bargaining table would be totally different.

Sidney Green is a Winnipeg lawyer

and former NDP cabinet minister.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition November 24, 2011 A15

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Keri Latimer looks for beauty in the dark and the spaces between the notes

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • MIKE DEAL / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS 060711 Chris Pedersen breeds Monarch butterflies in his back yard in East Selkirk watching as it transforms from the Larva or caterpillar through the Chrysalis stage to an adult Monarch. Here an adult Monarch within an hour of it emerging from the Chrysalis which can be seen underneath it.
  • KEN GIGLIOTTI  WINNIPEG FREE PRESS / July 23 2009 - 090723 - Bart Kives story - Harry Lazarenko Annual River Bank Tour - receding water from summer rains and erosion  damage by flood  and ice  during spring flooding -  Red River , Lyndale Dr. damage to tree roots , river bank damage  , high water marks after 2009 Flood - POY

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

What's your take on a report that shows violent crime is decreasing in Winnipeg?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google