Analysis

Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION

Bangladesh fire a lesson for Canadian firms

By: Janet Keeping and Iftekhar Zaman

Posted: 12/20/2012 1:33 PM | Comments: 0

Bangladeshi firefighters battle a fire at the Tazreen garment factory in the Savar neighborhood in Dhaka, Bangladesh. The factory did not have any fire exits for its 1,400 workers, many of whom became trapped by the blaze. Investigators said the death toll would have been far lower if there had been even a single emergency exit. (HASAN RAZA / ASSOCIATED PRESS ARCHIVES)

CALGARY — Much attention is being paid to the incidence of deadly fires in Bangladesh’s garment industry. The factory fire in Tazreen, Bangladesh, which killed more than 110 people, has been the primary focus of attention. But the Tazreen fire was far from the first in Bangladesh’s clothes manufacturing industry. It isn’t even the most recent. There was another a couple of days later.

Arson is blamed for the Tazreen fire but, as widely reported, the deaths were caused by "blocked stairwells and locked emergency exits." The company that owned the plant, the Tuba Group, is said to have been "repeatedly cited" for infractions of worker protection rules and thus looks culpable.

Responsibility also has to be borne by Bangladeshi government officials for failure to ensure those rules were enforced. Corruption is rampant in Bangladesh, which scores poorly on Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI).

Allegations have been made that corruption was involved in allowing the factory to stay open despite the repeated infractions. We cannot confirm that claim but would not find it surprising if that were the case. On the other hand, it may have been simple law enforcement incompetence or lack of funding, rather than corruption, that was at fault or, as is common, some combination of all three.

The bottom line is that worker safety laws were not enforced. There are lessons to be learned from tragedy in Bangladesh about the importance of the rule of law.

First, its absence kills. Examples are regrettably easy to come by. Consider the pilot who flew the Russian plane that crashed in September 2011 killing nearly the entire Lokomotiv hockey team. It is reported he didn’t have the training he claimed, that his piloting credentials were falsified.

Or what about the children in Sichuan China who died in 2008 when their schools collapsed on top of them because local officials corruptly colluded with contractors in their shoddy construction?

Most Canadians take the rule of law for granted most of the time. But the risk to human health and life in pervasively corrupt jurisdictions without a functioning rule of law — such as Russia, China and Bangladesh — is real and ever present.

Second, although Canadians may feel very distant from tragedy in places such as Bangladesh, they are not. Indeed they are implicated both directly and indirectly in both the problems and perhaps some of the solutions.

For one thing, the owner of the Tazreen factory, in which so many Bangladeshis died, is reported to be a Canadian.

For another, Canada’s only major conviction to date under the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act saw a Calgary-based oil and gas company — Niko Resources — plead guilty to bribing a Bangladeshi cabinet minister. There is no direct causal connection between bribing a cabinet minister to advance an oil and gas project and the failure to enforce worker safety laws. But by bribing that cabinet minister, Niko Resources was helping to perpetuate the lawlessness and corruption that keep Bangladeshis overwhelmingly poor and powerless, and which not infrequently kill them.

Worrisome too is that Canadian engineering company SNC-Lavalin is under investigation for alleged corruption around Bangladesh’s largest ever infrastructure project — the "Padma Bridge".

Many companies from developed countries seem to think it is OK to behave unethically in places such as Bangladesh, while purporting to be good corporate citizens at home. But in an age of instantaneous global communications, such blatantly inconsistent ethics don’t make the grade.

Establishing the rule of law and eradicating deeply entrenched corruption in places such as Bangladesh are extraordinarily complex tasks. The primary onus to effect such changes is on the governmental, political and professional institutions in those countries. But western companies doing business abroad have also to take responsibility for their actions.

Those companies are not helpless in the face of lawlessness and corruption in foreign jurisdictions.

For example, the Globe and Mail reported that a Montreal company "stopped importing from the Tuba Group’s Tazreen factory earlier this year because the company failed an (ethical-sourcing) audit." But as a result, poor Bangladeshi women lose their garment industry jobs. Better ways to resist corruption must be found. One is for companies to be more closely involved in preventive measures, such as strict compliance with safety standards, as part of their initial investment decision.

Another take-away for Canadians is the importance of vigilance at home. The allegations of collusion between government and business to inflate construction costs in Quebec, while not yet proven, are extremely disturbing. From other parts of the country we hear of abuses of power, such as politicians using their elected positions to solicit funds for their favourite charities. If not addressed in early stages, these abuses undermine the rule of law and produce a climate of impunity conducive to more egregious forms of corruption.

Janet Keeping is chair of Transparency International Canada. Iftekhar Zaman is Executive Director of Transparency International Bangladesh.

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required

In which story did you find the error? *
Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.
What was the error? *
Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.
What should we have written?
Please indicate your source for the correct information.
Who else should we interview to improve this story?
Please include any contact information you may have.
Can we contact you in the future for advice on stories about this topic?
Yes

No
First Name: *
Last Name: *
E–mail Address: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Phone: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Colour:
Are you blue? If you can see this, leave it blank and get some CSS support.
Enter the words that you see: * This is to prevent our forms from being filled out automatically.
You have failed to correctly identify the words in the box above. Please try again.

More Analysis

Undock

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.