Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION
Chinese auction: Christie’s and Sotheby’s are feeling the heat
"Slurring" is a method used by auctioneers to build excitement and anxiety among the bidding crowd. It uses carefully crafted phrases that create an illusion of rising intensity — "One dollar. Now two. Will you give me three? Do I hear four?" — to put pressure on bidders and boost the final price.
Buyers in Hong Kong and on the Chinese mainland have needed little encouragement in recent years. Sales in the region have soared from $859 million in 2004 to $12.66 billion last year, though the first half of this year was weak. Artprice, a research firm, reckons that Picasso, long the world’s most expensive artist, was knocked off the top spot in 2011 by two hitherto lesser-known Chinese painters, Zhang Daqian and Qi Baishi. One of the latter artist’s pieces sold in Beijing last year for $65 million.
Art auctions long had been dominated by two houses established in 18th-century London, Sotheby’s and Christie’s. However, the surging demand from China’s new rich for art — increasingly Chinese art — has led to the emergence of two Beijing-based giants, Poly and Guardian, whose combined sales of Chinese art are now nearly twice those of the London duo. Overall art sales in China are now 30 percent of worldwide sales, up from 9 percent in 2008.
Though the Chinese pair have only 26 years’ experience between them, compared with the four centuries the Western duo have amassed, they have been quick learners. Last year their combined revenues were $3.1 billion, up from $397 million in 2008.
The two Chinese challengers have interesting pedigrees. Poly’s owner is China Poly Group Corporation, a state-owned defense manufacturer better known for artillery than for art. Guardian was set up by Wang Yannan, daughter of Zhao Ziyang, the Chinese Communist Party leader until he was purged during the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989. Unlike Poly, it seeks to emulate its Western peers.
"Guardian is far more transparent than Poly," says Clare Mc Andrew of the consultancy Arts Economics. "I can get my head around this firm."
So far Western firms have been doing nicely running their Chinese-art auctions from Hong Kong, though now Sotheby’s is seeking to enter the mainland by means of a joint venture with Gehua, a smaller mainland auction house. The head of Christie’s in Asia, Francois Curiel, is skeptical of its rival’s move, arguing that, to sell art to mainland Chinese buyers free of import taxes, Sotheby’s would need an auction license from the government — which no Western firm has yet been given.
McAndrew also sees no sign of this changing, though of course Sotheby’s may be betting on the longer term.
The art market in China is not entirely a pretty picture. For a start, some local auction houses seem to be wildly exaggerating their sales to build themselves up. The Chinese Association of Auctioneers reckons that $885 million worth of 2010’s reported sales have not been paid for, and may thus not have taken place.
Worse, the recent sharp downturn — ArtTactic reckons that auction sales in China, including Hong Kong, fell 32 percent between autumn 2011 and spring of this year -- may prove to be more than merely a blip.
China’s auction market is much like other types of business in that country: Statistics are unreliable, and the government gives local firms — often owned by the state itself or by those with high-up connections — unfair advantages over foreigners.
Even so, as with all sorts of other industries, from car making to consumer goods, Chinese consumers are splashing so much money about that it is too big an opportunity for Western firms to ignore.
— The Economist
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 36 articles for this week)
Physician networks a way forward for health care
05/21/2013 3:20 PM 0Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- Physician networks a way forward for health care
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- Political opportunity knocks to abolish Senate
- This summer, check out health care elsewhere
- A decade after Mad Cow — the legacy of a crisis
- Harper embraces multilateralism on Arctic issues
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- Clothing sellers should unite on Bangladesh
- Linking hospital quality to payment in Ontario
- ‘Signs’ of hope, little more, in Greece
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- Angelina Jolie: 'I feel empowered... '
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- Cash for coitus scheme gets axed in Oz
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- Harper fuels opposition to oilsands projects
- Physician networks a way forward for health care
- Never take candy from a stranger
- Don, it's not about nakedness
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- What are they smoking at First Nations Bank?
- Celebrated economics theory wrong
- Manitoba could follow B.C. on surrogacy issue
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- 'Genetic engineered' might save planet
- Angelina Jolie: 'I feel empowered... '
- Why we assume the worst
- Public debt management, the Alberta example
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Kim Sigurdson It's time for government fish monger to cut bait
- Speeding fine only half of it
- How CBC and others torque ratings
- Ice roads, airships could work together
- Where is Canada's strategy to help Ukraine?
- Climate options -- grim, grimmer, grimmest
- Mother Nature springs into action
- Industry, First Nations partnerships exploding
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
Ads by Google












You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.