Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION
Criticial for Romney to polish image in tonight's speech
TAMPA, Fla. — This week’s Republican National Convention was designed to counter the months-long Democratic campaign to define Mitt Romney as a rich, uncaring billionaire and present him as a devoted family man whose business experience will rescue the country from its economic doldrums.
"This week is about telling the Mitt Romney story," party chairman Reince Priebus proclaimed in advance.
But that goal seemed lost the first two days as most speakers concentrated on deriding President Obama’s record, mocking words they claimed reflected disdain for small businesses and blaming him for running up the national debt while failing to revive the economy.
Fortunately for Romney, his wife, Ann, provided a glowing dose of positive reinforcement on Tuesday night, holding rapt the 20,000 Republicans who packed the Tampa Bay Times Forum — and his campaign hoped the millions watching on television — with the loving details of 47 years with "this boy I met at a highschool dance.
"His name is Mitt Romney and you really should get to know him," she declared. "This man will not fail. This man will not let us down. He will take us to a better place just as he took me home safely from that dance. Give him that chance."
The harsh anti-Obama tone quickly returned in a hectoring, self-congratulatory keynote speech by New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie. But Mrs. Romney set the stage for Romney himself to fill in the missing personal and substantive details in tonight’s acceptance speech, one of his two greatest opportunities — along with October’s debates — to persuade a still skeptical electorate.
Indeed, says a Temple University political scientist who studied the impact of key campaign events, the conventions proved decisive in 14 of the last 15 elections, with the winner evident within a week to 10 days afterward. (The exception: Ronald Reagan’s late-breaking 1980 victory.)
"In a year like this, a two- to three-point shift could solidify things for Obama or give Romney an edge," said Christopher Wleziel, stressing the nominee’s acceptance speech. "What Romney says in that speech and what he does that night, that’s probably going to most matter to people."
His speech is designed to accomplish three main goals:
- Give America a better sense of his human side. His discussion of doing the laundry and shopping at Costco in a Fox News Sunday interview was a start in presenting him as a warm family man.
- Give undecided voters a better sense of how he’d govern and improve the economy. He needs to go beyond the same old Republican nostrums about tax-cutting our way to prosperity and increasing defense spending, making vague promises to balance the budget without showing how.
- Reach out to more moderate centrist voters made wary by his lengthy, concerted effort to woo the conservative GOP base.
"Voters need to see a multidimensional human being who instinctively feels their pain and understands the deep fear a broken economy brings to the vulnerable," veteran GOP operative Mike Murphy wrote in Time magazine. "Romney’s speech must go beyond mere biography and paint a vivid picture of where he wants to lead the country."
Recent polls show voters see him less favorably than Obama and less in the political mainstream, and he trails badly on some important traits.
In the latest NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, Obama led by over 20 points on caring about average people and being likeable and over 10 on issues of concern to seniors, specifically Medicare. (Later polls showed Romney doing better on Medicare.)
By contrast, Romney led by single digits on having good ideas to improve the economy and changing business as usual in Washington. A CNN/Opinion Research poll showed him with a small lead on managing the government and having a plan to solve the nation’s problems.
Whatever Romney’s successes here, his image faces a renewed battering when the Democrats convene next week in Charlotte, N.C. Only afterwards will it be evident if Romney has burnished his image and improved his prospects.
Carl P. Leubsdorf is the former Washington bureau chief of the Dallas Morning News.
— The Dallas Morning News
Fact Check
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 34 articles for this week)
This summer, check out health care elsewhere
1:00 AM 0For many Canadians, the Victoria Day long weekend marks the beginning of summertime holiday planning, if not a late-May escape ...
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- Clothing sellers should unite on Bangladesh
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- ‘Signs’ of hope, little more, in Greece
- Never take candy from a stranger
- How to make another bad winter for honeybees better
- Public debt management, the Alberta example
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- A decade after Mad Cow — the legacy of a crisis
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- Angelina Jolie: 'I feel empowered... '
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- Cash for coitus scheme gets axed in Oz
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- Harper fuels opposition to oilsands projects
- A small but welcome crack in supply management
- Never take candy from a stranger
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- 3D printers will make outsourcing so yesterday
- Don, it's not about nakedness
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- What are they smoking at First Nations Bank?
- Celebrated economics theory wrong
- Manitoba could follow B.C. on surrogacy issue
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- 3D printers will make outsourcing so yesterday
- 'Genetic engineered' might save planet
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Internet becoming a jungle
- Canada and the Arctic Council
- Making NRC tool of industry bad for science
- Angelina Jolie: 'I feel empowered... '
- Why we assume the worst
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- How CBC and others torque ratings
- Kim Sigurdson It's time for government fish monger to cut bait
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ice roads, airships could work together
- Where is Canada's strategy to help Ukraine?
- Climate options -- grim, grimmer, grimmest
- Mother Nature springs into action
- Industry, First Nations partnerships exploding
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.