Analysis

Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION

Fox News dumps Dick Morris, Sarah Palin

By: Erik Wemple

Posted: 02/7/2013 9:42 AM | Comments: 0

No more Fox News contributor Dick Morris. His contract to spout republic-damaging nonsense on Fox airwaves has expired, and the network isn’t renewing it.

Taken together with the news that Sarah Palin will no longer be contributing, the Morris development is strong evidence that Fox News has glimpsed the underside of allowing charlatans to brand its coverage. Palin was a roboto-contributor, who responded to everything with a little crack on the lame-stream media and a reference to President Barack Obama’s socialist heart.

As for Morris’s misdeeds, well, everyone knows what they are. That’s because Fox News presented them so prominently in the run-up to last year’s presidential election. In his prime-time, pre-election appearances, Morris was among the few pundits who wouldn’t hedge his bets; who wouldn’t triangulate his way through the polling numbers; who wouldn’t rummage through scenario after scenario in his analysis.

No, Dick Morris was predicting a Mitt Romney landslide. Fox News fell for it, and surely millions of Americans did as well. After all, in the same breath that he was predicting landslides, he was citing his own expertise:

"It’s not a question of being smarter than anybody else. It’s that I’ve done this for a living and there are very few people on television who talk about politics who’ve ever made a living doing it, and most of them are partisan and echoing a point of view, but when you get down to it, a guy like Karl Rove or Pat Caddell or me or even Joe Trippi, we make a living doing this and I’ve made a living doing it for 40 years."

Vast arrogance and loose, poorly substantiated facts: a great combination for a cable-news contributor in these modern times. That Morris would choose to criticize all those "partisan" pundits on television is doubly ironic-pathetic. For one, Morris was a partisan player in the 2012 election who made frequent references to his work on the campaign trail; the Associated Press even noted that he was "criticized for accepting paid advertisements on his website from candidates that he discussed on the air at Fox."

And Morris’s front-and-center predictions of a Romney landslide reflected a partisan desperation on the part of Fox News leading up to the campaign. Another element of that desperation was the network’s unending Benghazi coverage. Though much of the outrage on Fox airwaves regarding the Sept. 11 tragedy was well founded, Fox News published a blockbuster story just days before the election, and key parts of it have fallen apart under scrutiny.

With hindsight, it bears the profile of an attempt to tilt the playing field against the incumbent president.

Yet this is a time to celebrate Fox News. It has seen the lunacy of Dick Morris, and it’s taking the appropriate step to inoculate itself against the ravages. Who knows who’ll fill the minutes on Fox programs that Morris once populated with his verbal meanderings, but odds are it won’t be as bad. Consider this little monologue that Morris spewed to his supporters after the election:

"I worked pretty hard over the course of this election. I was inspired by the dedication, the commitment, the energy the focus, the knowledge, the intelligence of you, of the people at the other end of this camera. This is not the end, this can’t be the end, this is not how our country ends. This is not the end of the narrative that started with our revolution, continued through our Civil War and has made us by far the greatest country on earth. This is not the end. We can’t let this guy end it for us."

Don’t worry, Morris: It’s the end only of your relevance.

—The Washington Post

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required

In which story did you find the error? *
Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.
What was the error? *
Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.
What should we have written?
Please indicate your source for the correct information.
Who else should we interview to improve this story?
Please include any contact information you may have.
Can we contact you in the future for advice on stories about this topic?
Yes

No
First Name: *
Last Name: *
E–mail Address: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Phone: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Colour:
Are you blue? If you can see this, leave it blank and get some CSS support.
Enter the words that you see: * This is to prevent our forms from being filled out automatically.
You have failed to correctly identify the words in the box above. Please try again.

More Analysis

Undock

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.