15°c Overcast
16°c Light rain
Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION
Is it even possible to deal with Taliban?
Pakistani women hold banners during a protest condemning the attack on schoolgirl Malala Yousufzai, in Islamabad, Pakistan, Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2012. Pakistani doctors successfully removed a bullet Wednesday from the neck of a 14-year-old girl who was shot by the Taliban for speaking out in support of education for women, a government minister said. Banner top right reads, "The Taliban is afraid of an unarmed girl." (MUHAMMED MUHEISEN / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS)
On Tuesday, Pakistani Taliban thugs tried to assassinate a 14-year-old girl. You read that correctly: Masked gunmen from the ultra-purist Islamist group stormed a van full of schoolchildren in an effort to kill Malala Yousafzai, who has won international acclaim for going to school in defiance of Taliban edicts against educating girls in her home region of Swat.
With chilling pride, a Taliban spokesman announced that the attack was revenge for Malala’s having generated "negative propaganda" about Islam; he called her an "obscenity." That strikes us as an apt description of the attack itself; if anything is causing a negative view of Islam around the world, it is the Taliban’s attempts to impose a medieval social order on Pakistan and Afghanistan.
At last check, Malala, though critically wounded, was expected to survive. The larger question, of course, is whether the progress she both embodied and sought to extend will prove lasting. The Taliban struck this brave youngster at least in part because it knows that she may represent the wave of the future. She enjoyed significant popularity in Pakistan, as shown by the condemnation that rained down on the Taliban from the highest levels of the government and from the country’s media.
For all its woes, Pakistan has shown measurable progress in educating girls. Pakistani females ages 15 to 24 were half as likely as males to be literate in 1990; in 2009, that ratio had improved to three-quarters, according to the United Nations. Alas, the greatest obstacles to girls’ schooling exist in rural areas where the Taliban and other extreme groups maintain a presence.
A similar drama is playing out across the border in Afghanistan. In May, the Ministry of Education said that 550 schools in 11 Taliban-plagued provinces had been forced to close their doors. And in 2011, 150 girls fell ill at a school near Kabul, in an apparent mass poisoning by foes of female education.
The Obama administration has repeatedly said that it is open to a negotiated settlement to the Afghan conflict — but only if the Taliban agrees to abide by Afghanistan’s constitution, including its protections of women’s and minority rights. So far, of course, talks have not even begun. Taliban hard-liners seem content to wait until after 2014, when the United States is scheduled to finish withdrawing from Afghanistan.
In December, Vice President Joe Biden publicly summarized the administration’s rationale for negotiations, noting that "the Taliban per se is not our enemy." This was reasonable, to the extent Biden was simply saying that the United States could deal with the Taliban, or elements of it, that agrees to repudiate al-Qaida and respect the constitution.
The vile attack in Pakistan, though, reminds us that enmity is a two-way street, and the Taliban still hates the United States and everything it stands for — whether we like it or not. According to the Taliban spokesman, one of Malala’s worst sins was to "consider President Obama as her ideal leader." It might never be possible to strike a deal with such people. It should always be possible for the United States to help protect innocents from them.
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- Shocking exclusion
- Will stereotype perceptions of crack cocaine go to pot?
- Manitoba showed that a 'Senate' can be abolished
- Flat-rate property tax tabled
- Airports belong to Canadian taxpayers
- Vancouver water cheap, unmetered
- Boston bomber love-bombed by fangirls
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- To call 'Cliffy' a character doesn't do him justice
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- BlackBerry: off the mat, hitting back
- Physician networks a way forward for health care
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- Lower drug prices, lower costs, better care?
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- How to humble wing nuts
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- A decade after Mad Cow — the legacy of a crisis
- Don, it's not about nakedness
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Manitoba could follow B.C. on surrogacy issue
- City council can't decide which bus to ride
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- Shocking exclusion
- Manitoba showed that a 'Senate' can be abolished
- Manitoba could follow B.C. on surrogacy issue
- Flat-rate property tax tabled
- Shocking exclusion
- How to humble wing nuts
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- Bill 18 is perfect example of bad law
- THIS IS NO WAY TO MAKE A POINT!!!
- Harper embraces multilateralism on Arctic issues
- Elijah's essence was most easily found in the wilderness
- Manitoba showed that a 'Senate' can be abolished
- Mental health system lacking funds, awareness
- 'Genetic engineered' might save planet
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Kim Sigurdson It's time for government fish monger to cut bait
- Speeding fine only half of it
- How CBC and others torque ratings
- Where is Canada's strategy to help Ukraine?
- Mother Nature springs into action
- Female chiefs needed
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- 'Longevity pensions' a promising idea
- Fisher could have been paid $16,000 for his 'wasted fish'
Ads by Google
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.