Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION
Posted: 04/5/2013 3:42 PM | Comments: 0
Putting an age restriction on buying the most common emergency contraception over the counter was never sound from a medical point of view. Now a federal judge has upset the political calculus behind the restriction, as well.
By the time the Food and Drug Administration decided, in late 2011, to lift the rule that girls under age 17 need a prescription for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.’s Plan B, the pill’s safety was well-established. What’s more, research had shown that the drug, which had been characterized as an abortion pill, was nothing of the sort. It works by interfering with fertilization. There’s no evidence that it blocks the development of an already fertilized egg.
Yet Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius overruled the FDA’s decision, and President Barack Obama endorsed her unprecedented action, arguing that, without an age limit, a 10- or 11-year-old could go to a drugstore and — "alongside bubble gum or batteries — be able to buy a medication that potentially, if not used properly, could end up having an adverse effect."
as federal Judge Edward R. Korman pointed out in overruling Sebelius’s action, HOWEVER, when it comes to safety, "the standards are the same for aspirin and for contraceptives."
If anything, age restrictions on the morning-after pill are a bigger problem than they would be for pain relievers. Many doctors have explained why. The pill is most effective if taken within 24 hours of unprotected sex; there often isn’t time for users to see a doctor before going to the pharmacy. Last November, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended that its members work around the age restriction by prescribing the drug to teens in advance. (The American Medical Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists also support making the morning-after pill available with no restrictions.)
Korman denounced Sebelius’s interference in FDA decision-making just as he had earlier denounced efforts by THE George W. Bush White House to delay FDA action on the morning-after pill. The reasons Sebelius gave for her move — including "cognitive and behavioural" differences in the youngest reproductive-age girls — were "so unpersuasive as to call into question her good faith," the judge said.
Korman instructed the FDA to make emergency contraceptives available with no prescription or age restrictions within 30 days.
Now Sebelius must decide whether to appeal the ruling. With the presidential election that loomed over the secretary’s 2011 action well past, she should let the judge’s order stand.
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
Having problems with the form?Contact Us Directly
Election rules linked to turmoil in Ferguson
A war for Britain
Manitoba must focus on academic achievement
Russia, Ukraine play a dangerous game of chicken
Dysfunctional enemies will help ISIS win
The problem with twits and trolls
Charity must play bigger role in aboriginal issues
Knee defender can’t be defended
Patience and improvisation may be necessary in federal reserve policy
Don’t be negative about negative ads
Judicial review useless for family
The Obama doctrine
First Nations election law could face rough ride
Hope is not a strategy in climate change
Quitting the NFL cold turkey
Italy threatens to let loose refugees picked up in the sea
Mexico an entry point for terrorists into the U.S.?
Palestinians, aboriginals share culture of vulnerability
How to explain the success of the “ice bucket challenge”
Something must come from Williams’ death
Use prizes as incentive to get the vote out
Seeing health care clearly
Mayoral candidates need long-term plan for infrastructure
Time for a talk
Sociological responses to crime needed
Fantino failing veterans