Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION

Move on Obama’s emissions target

  • Print
Miners shovel coal at a mine in Xiahuayuan county, north China's Hebei province. President Barack Obama's proposal to curb U.S. greenhouse gas emissions might improve the chances of completing a global climate treaty but is unlikely to defuse demands by China, India and others for Americans to do more.

ODED BALILTY / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES Enlarge Image

Miners shovel coal at a mine in Xiahuayuan county, north China's Hebei province. President Barack Obama's proposal to curb U.S. greenhouse gas emissions might improve the chances of completing a global climate treaty but is unlikely to defuse demands by China, India and others for Americans to do more.

There’s much to like about the Obama administration’s proposed rules on carbon emissions — especially if critics from the political left and right will take the time to recognize political realities and environmental benefits.

The Environmental Protection Agency draft regulations unveiled Monday are designed, by 2030, to cut carbon dioxide emissions from existing coal plants — a major source of greenhouse gases — up to 30 percent from 2005 levels. Wisely, the proposal leaves ample room and time for states and companies to accomplish these goals through free-market approaches.

States and utilities, for example, would have a broad array of ways to comply, such as improving energy efficiency, increasing the use of natural gas, using more renewable energy and making power plant improvements. Consumers would be offered discounts to shift electricity use to off-peak hours.

This is significant progress, given that President Barack Obama had largely ignored the climate change issue since failing to pass comprehensive energy legislation during his first term. At last, the president’s climate change policy is more than occasional promises to do something.

Conservative critics will wrongly call the new rules a job killer and political overreach; environmentalists will contend they don’t go far enough. Here’s the truth: Instead of establishing hard caps, the regulations would give utilities and states 15 years to get the job done and provide them the authority to implement tailored emissions reduction strategies. Texas, which generates roughly 30 percent of its power from coal, would have to make larger cuts over time than some states. However, Texans benefit from replacement of dirty energy sources with cleaner ones.

Carbon emissions have dropped nationally since 2005. Cleaner-burning natural gas now supplies about half of Texas’ electricity needs. Going forward, companies are likely to shutter dirty plants, invest in modern equipment that limits CO2 and other carbon emissions, or increasingly invest in cleaner alternative technologies.

This newspaper still favours tough carbon controls and is open to the idea that some states may implement stricter carbon caps to achieve their emissions goal. Meanwhile, the corporate landscape is changing. For example, Exxon Mobil, which used to spend millions of dollars to lobby against efforts to tax or limit carbon emissions, is among at least 29 major businesses now factoring carbon regulation into long-range plans. Among the other firms are Wal-Mart, Microsoft, Disney, Wells Fargo, General Electric and nine major energy companies, according to research group CDP North America.

Not surprisingly, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality responded Monday with disappointment that the EPA, not Congress, was in the driver’s seat in this latest effort to regulate CO2 emissions. We urge Texas regulators to put aside objections such as this one and recognize that these rules are not a threat, but rather a health-conscious opportunity for our state and the entire nation.

 

— The Dallas Morning News

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

WRHA says discrimination contributed to Brian Sinclair's death

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A gaggle of Canada geese goslings at Woodsworth Park in Winnipeg Monday- See Project Honk Day 05- May 07, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • Ruth Bonneville Winnipeg Free Press January 18, 2011 Local Standup -

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Do you think it's a good idea for Theresa Oswald to enter NDP leadership race?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google