14°c Clear
25°c Variable cloudiness
Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION
Other Opinion: American airport boarding checks not so secure
The bar codes contain information about how much scrutiny the TSA will give each ticket holder (TED S. WARREN / ASSOCIATED PRESS ARCHIVES)
If, queued up at the airport — shoes half off, belt slung over your shoulder, laptop balanced precariously on one hand — you’ve ever looked at the speedy "pre-check" security line and wondered how easy it would be to fake your way into a less invasive screening, you would have been onto something.
The Post’s James Ball reports that frequent fliers and technology geeks have discovered that the Transportation Security Administration’s boarding pass procedures are bizarrely insecure, allowing those with some basic software and know-how to read sensitive security information contained in boarding pass bar codes and even to alter those bar codes. The result could be bad guys getting around tough screening or the government’s no-fly list.
The bar codes contain information about how much scrutiny the TSA will give each ticket holder. But they aren’t encrypted. Any passenger with a smartphone can figure out whether he or she is destined for the pre-check line, which was designed for very frequent fliers and others thought to pose few security risks, or the line for tougher screening. In theory, this could tip off a terrorist who has managed to qualify himself for pre-check to the sort of security he will have to deal with.
More troubling, though, is that it is also possible for said terrorist to fiddle with the bar code. He could place himself in the pre-check line. Or, if he is on a no-fly list, he could change the name printed on a copy of his boarding pass. That could fool the TSA agents checking tickets at security checkpoints, because they don’t compare the names in the bar codes to the database of fliers that the airlines keep.
Longtime boarding pass security critic Chris Soghoian points out there are easy policy changes that can fix both problems. Requiring each bar code to bear a digital signature would make any tampering evident. The TSA already has the technology to handle this - it is just a matter of making sure the airlines cooperate. The TSA could also shake up how it decides which passengers will undergo random checks.
The justification for extensive airline security is not that it will ever be foolproof but that the apparatus of no-fly lists, backscatter scanners, bar code machines and TSA agents is worth the expense of money, time and invaded privacy to make it more difficult for terrorists to attack the country’s airlines. That logic relies on the notion that the TSA can anticipate flaws and, if it doesn’t, quickly fix them when others point them out.
Fact Check
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 28 articles for this week)
Elijah Harper changed my world
06/17/2013 2:31 PM 0WESTBANK, B.C. — When Elijah Harper passed away on May 17, 2013 I felt as though an arrow had pierced ...
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- Beauty and the (mortgage) Beast
- Best of bad odds in Syria
- That will be $90,000 down, please
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Work, not retirement, saves lives
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- Mau Maus win 50-year-long battle
- Elijah Harper changed my world
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Too rural, too white, too male
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Hydro must serve citizens, not government
- Expense scandal dogs Nova Scotia's fading NDP government
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- Beauty and the (mortgage) Beast
- Appalling rates of public-sector absenteeism must be addressed
- UNESCO's concerns unrelated to Bipole III
- What might it be like when pot is legal?
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Key of Bart: Video Killed The Mayor Who Hates The Toronto Star
- Too rural, too white, too male
- A sorry fact -- Katz finds it hard to apologize
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- Manitoba Hydro's halcyon days are gone
- The key of Bart
- Ford can't resign as mayor soon enough
- Obama gets ‘revenge’ with Rice appointment
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- UNESCO's concerns unrelated to Bipole III
- Aging makes women proud — and loud
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- Work, not retirement, saves lives
- Hydro must serve citizens, not government
- UNESCO's concerns unrelated to Bipole III
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Erdogan — a Chavez-style strongman who gets results
- Aging makes women proud — and loud
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- Anti-GM foods activist sees the science -- and the light
- Teachers should fast-track inclusive plan
- Power exercised in secret is most easily abused
- No bailouts required for Pollock's
- Teachers should fast-track inclusive plan
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Manitoba Hydro's halcyon days are gone
- Hydro must serve citizens, not government
- Shocking exclusion
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Gadgets in classrooms are gimmicks
- ‘Stand your ground’ case not what it seemed
- Hydro plans will be scrutinized in public
Ads by Google
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
Have Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?
Login SubscribeHave Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?
SubscribeThe Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.