Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION

Other Opinion: Saudi Arabia’s rights abuses shameful

  • Print

In many nations, the privilege of driving a car requires a minimum age, passing a test and honouring the laws of the road. But women in Saudi Arabia don’t even get a chance. They are not issued licenses, an informal but very deliberate discrimination in a male-dominated and deeply traditional society. Women must rely on men to drive them everywhere.

On Oct. 26, a group of about 60 women, in a display of defiance and common sense, staged a protest, getting behind the wheel despite threats and warnings from the authorities. About 16 were detained and fined, and the protest drew wide attention. Three women members of the Shura council, an advisory body, have come out in favor of lifting the ban, although so far nothing has come of it.

At the same time, the Saudi authorities appear to be responding vigorously to protests against the absolute monarchy, often using the kingdom’s Sharia-based justice system giving judges wide powers of interpretation.

On Wednesday, Oct. 30, the authorities released a blogger, Hamza Kashgari, in Jeddah, after 625 days in prison without charge or trial. He was detained in February 2012 after posting three tweets that were viewed as disrespectful of the prophet Muhammad. On the same day that he was released, a prominent Saudi human rights lawyer, Waleed Abu al-Khair, said he was sentenced to three months in prison for signing a petition in 2011 that demanded political reforms and denounced the imprisonment of a group of activists. He faces other charges in separate proceedings as well, all stemming from his human rights work. On Oct. 27, the authorities detained a columnist, Tariq al-Mubarak, who supported ending the ban on women driving.

Also in recent weeks, Saudi Arabia’s human rights record was subject to periodic review at the U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva. The United States voiced concern about restrictions on freedom of religion and association; Britain called for abolition of the Saudi system of male guardianship for women; and Germany called for a moratorium on the use of the death penalty.

The Saudi representative defended the nation’s commitment to human rights. But reports submitted to the council tell a different story. According to Human Rights Watch, the kingdom has convicted seven prominent human rights and civil society activists since the beginning of 2013 on broad, catch-all charges, such as "trying to distort the reputation of the kingdom" or "breaking allegiance with the ruler." Amnesty International told the council that Saudi Arabia implemented "none of the central recommendations" made in the 2009 review, including to guarantee the rights of women. A growing human rights movement in recent years, Amnesty said, has been met with "harsh repressive measures such as arbitrary arrests, detentions without charge or trial, unfair trials and travel bans."

This is a sorry and shameful record. Perhaps the women who dared steer their own cars can do it more often and drive Saudi Arabia toward modernity.

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Exclusive architectural tour of CMHR with Antoine Predock

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A one day old piglet glances up from his morning feeding at Cedar Lane Farm near Altona.    Standup photo Ruth Bonneville Winnipeg Free Press
  • Young goslings jostle for position to take a drink from a puddle in Brookside Cemetery Thursday morning- Day 23– June 14, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Should the Canadian Museum for Human Rights use the word 'genocide' in exhibits on Indian residential schools?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google