18°c Overcast
14°c Cloudy periods
Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION
Same-sex marriage rights at last in U.S.?
Amber Weiss and Sharon Papo, both of Berkeley, Calif., hold hands during their 2008 wedding ceremony at City Hall in San Francisco. (DARRYL BUSH / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS)
The long-awaited announcement has finally come. The Supreme Court of the United States will take up two cases involving same-sex marriage. Thus we could be in the final days of the discrimination wrought by the so-called Defence of Marriage Act (DOMA).
The court will hear a challenge to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision that California’s Proposition 8 is unconstitutional. The 2008 ballot measure made same-sex marriage illegal there through an amendment to the state’s constitution.
The court will also hear Windsor versus United States. Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer of New York had been together 42 years when they legally married in Canada in 2007. When Spyer died in 2009, Windsor had to pay the Internal Revenue Service $363,053 in estate taxes because DOMA prevents the IRS from recognizing her as a surviving spouse.
DOMA is doomed. The main reason for my optimism is based in the fact that the Windsor case is not a quest for a special right of any kind. Windsor was legally married.
What she wants — what all similarly suited same-sex couples and those who aspire to marriage want for themselves — is to have her marriage recognized by the federal government and to enjoy the rights and responsibilities that go with that.
But as The Washington Post reports, the Windsor case "would not require an answer to the broader constitutional question of whether [same-sex couples] must be allowed to marry."
On Election Day, the people of Maine, Maryland and Washington states said yes to marriage equality. The people of Minnesota beat back an effort to ban same-sex marriage through their state constitution.
While the rights of a minority should never be up to a popular vote, that voters in those states said "I do" to allowing gay and lesbian couples marry is a historic shift that should not be ignored by the Supreme Court.
Arguments will be heard in March. A decision is expected in June.
—The Washington Post
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- Shocking exclusion
- Will stereotype perceptions of crack cocaine go to pot?
- Manitoba showed that a 'Senate' can be abolished
- Airports belong to Canadian taxpayers
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- Vancouver water cheap, unmetered
- Flat-rate property tax tabled
- To call 'Cliffy' a character doesn't do him justice
- Boston bomber love-bombed by fangirls
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- BlackBerry: off the mat, hitting back
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- Physician networks a way forward for health care
- Lower drug prices, lower costs, better care?
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- How to humble wing nuts
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- A decade after Mad Cow — the legacy of a crisis
- Don, it's not about nakedness
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Manitoba could follow B.C. on surrogacy issue
- City council can't decide which bus to ride
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- Shocking exclusion
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- How to humble wing nuts
- Bill 18 is perfect example of bad law
- THIS IS NO WAY TO MAKE A POINT!!!
- Harper embraces multilateralism on Arctic issues
- Elijah's essence was most easily found in the wilderness
- Manitoba showed that a 'Senate' can be abolished
- Mental health system lacking funds, awareness
- 'Genetic engineered' might save planet
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Kim Sigurdson It's time for government fish monger to cut bait
- Speeding fine only half of it
- How CBC and others torque ratings
- Where is Canada's strategy to help Ukraine?
- Mother Nature springs into action
- Female chiefs needed
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- 'Longevity pensions' a promising idea
- Fisher could have been paid $16,000 for his 'wasted fish'
Ads by Google
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.