Analysis

Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION

Same-sex marriage rights at last in U.S.?

By: Jonathan Capehart

Posted: 12/10/2012 3:43 PM | Comments: 0

Amber Weiss and Sharon Papo, both of Berkeley, Calif., hold hands during their 2008 wedding ceremony at City Hall in San Francisco. (DARRYL BUSH / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS)

The long-awaited announcement has finally come. The Supreme Court of the United States will take up two cases involving same-sex marriage. Thus we could be in the final days of the discrimination wrought by the so-called Defence of Marriage Act (DOMA).

The court will hear a challenge to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision that California’s Proposition 8 is unconstitutional. The 2008 ballot measure made same-sex marriage illegal there through an amendment to the state’s constitution.

The court will also hear Windsor versus United States. Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer of New York had been together 42 years when they legally married in Canada in 2007. When Spyer died in 2009, Windsor had to pay the Internal Revenue Service $363,053 in estate taxes because DOMA prevents the IRS from recognizing her as a surviving spouse.

DOMA is doomed. The main reason for my optimism is based in the fact that the Windsor case is not a quest for a special right of any kind. Windsor was legally married.

What she wants — what all similarly suited same-sex couples and those who aspire to marriage want for themselves — is to have her marriage recognized by the federal government and to enjoy the rights and responsibilities that go with that.

But as The Washington Post reports, the Windsor case "would not require an answer to the broader constitutional question of whether [same-sex couples] must be allowed to marry."

On Election Day, the people of Maine, Maryland and Washington states said yes to marriage equality. The people of Minnesota beat back an effort to ban same-sex marriage through their state constitution.

While the rights of a minority should never be up to a popular vote, that voters in those states said "I do" to allowing gay and lesbian couples marry is a historic shift that should not be ignored by the Supreme Court.

Arguments will be heard in March. A decision is expected in June.

—The Washington Post

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required

In which story did you find the error? *
Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.
What was the error? *
Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.
What should we have written?
Please indicate your source for the correct information.
Who else should we interview to improve this story?
Please include any contact information you may have.
Can we contact you in the future for advice on stories about this topic?
Yes

No
First Name: *
Last Name: *
E–mail Address: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Phone: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Colour:
Are you blue? If you can see this, leave it blank and get some CSS support.
Enter the words that you see: * This is to prevent our forms from being filled out automatically.
You have failed to correctly identify the words in the box above. Please try again.

More Analysis

Undock

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.