10°c Overcast
15°c Mainly sunny
Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION
Too much secrecy around mileage claims
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency won’t tell the public specifics about the problems involving auto mileage estimates from the two automakers. (TYLER BROWNBRIDGE / POSTMEDIA NEWS ARCHIVES)
The mileage claims made by automakers play a key role in a multibillion-dollar industry that deserves close government scrutiny. But what happens when the regulators fall down on the job?
The federal Environmental Protection Agency has failed consumers with its abysmal handling of a controversy involving the fuel efficiency of some recent Hyundai and Kia vehicles.
As detailed in The Kansas City Star on Sunday, the EPA won’t tell the public specifics about the problems involving auto mileage estimates from the two automakers.
The EPA also won’t comment when asked about how well the annual fuel economy standard tests are overseen by the government these days.
Finally, it’s extremely disappointing that environmental groups had to pressure the EPA for many months to even do its job and check into complaints about lower-than-expected mileage for certain vehicles.
The entire episode amounts to a shocking dereliction of duty by the EPA. It also, unfortunately, gives critics in Congress ammunition to attack the agency, which has important roles to play when it comes to cleaning up air and water.
For decades, the public has come to believe that the EPA essentially endorses whatever mileage statements are made by General Motors, Ford, Chrysler, Toyota, Honda and other carmakers.
But the controversy involving Hyundai and Kia tarnishes those two companies and the EPA. Plus, other major auto manufacturers such as GM are left to wonder whether the public will now distrust their estimates, too.
So were the recent errors honest mistakes? No one knows because the carmakers have not disclosed exactly what might have gone wrong.
Another problem: The EPA reportedly does not hire an outside expert to randomly check vehicles on the accuracy of their stated mileage claims using the same test that apparently brought to light the latest problems. Why did the agency stop such monitoring? Will it restart the program?
Cue up the once-again mum EPA officials who, as The Star noted, also refused to provide documents about the entire matter.
So much for being a public watchdog. In this case, the EPA seems more like an apologist for bad behaviour by parts of the auto industry.
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 35 articles for this week)
This summer, check out health care elsewhere
1:00 AM 0For many Canadians, the Victoria Day long weekend marks the beginning of summertime holiday planning, if not a late-May escape ...
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- Clothing sellers should unite on Bangladesh
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- ‘Signs’ of hope, little more, in Greece
- How to make another bad winter for honeybees better
- Public debt management, the Alberta example
- Never take candy from a stranger
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- A decade after Mad Cow — the legacy of a crisis
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- Angelina Jolie: 'I feel empowered... '
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- Cash for coitus scheme gets axed in Oz
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- Harper fuels opposition to oilsands projects
- A small but welcome crack in supply management
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- Never take candy from a stranger
- Low turnout makes farce of B.C. election
- Don, it's not about nakedness
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- What are they smoking at First Nations Bank?
- Celebrated economics theory wrong
- Manitoba could follow B.C. on surrogacy issue
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- 3D printers will make outsourcing so yesterday
- 'Genetic engineered' might save planet
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Internet becoming a jungle
- Canada and the Arctic Council
- Making NRC tool of industry bad for science
- Angelina Jolie: 'I feel empowered... '
- Why we assume the worst
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Kim Sigurdson It's time for government fish monger to cut bait
- How CBC and others torque ratings
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ice roads, airships could work together
- Where is Canada's strategy to help Ukraine?
- Climate options -- grim, grimmer, grimmest
- Mother Nature springs into action
- Industry, First Nations partnerships exploding
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
Ads by Google
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.